You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
(8) |
2
(4) |
3
(21) |
4
(23) |
5
(3) |
6
|
7
(8) |
8
(2) |
9
|
10
(6) |
11
(4) |
12
(6) |
13
(1) |
14
(9) |
15
(10) |
16
(11) |
17
(3) |
18
(10) |
19
(9) |
20
(2) |
21
(10) |
22
(16) |
23
(8) |
24
(6) |
25
(6) |
26
(3) |
27
(5) |
28
(1) |
29
(14) |
30
(5) |
31
(14) |
|
|
From: PGM <pgm...@gm...> - 2006-08-25 21:00:29
|
Hola, Use the SVN version, it works pretty OK with 1.0b2 |
From: Flavio C. <fcc...@gm...> - 2006-08-25 20:52:28
|
hi which is the latest version of numpy supported by matplotlib? I recently updated to numpy 1.0b2 and I cant import pylab anymore. part of the problem is this code of numerix.__init__.py: elif which[0] =3D=3D "numpy": try: import numpy.oldnumeric as numpy from numpy.oldnumeric import * except ImportError: import numpy from numpy import * from _sp_imports import nx, infinity from _sp_imports import UInt8, UInt16, UInt32 Matrix =3D matrix matrix is no longer present on numpy.oldnumeric, so... it breaks.... any hints? --=20 Fl=E1vio Code=E7o Coelho registered Linux user # 386432 --------------------------- "Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made." Otto von Bismark |
From: Derek H. <dh...@cs...> - 2006-08-25 09:14:23
|
Jouni=20 Wow! A guru at work... this solves all my current problems; your insights and comments are most appreciated! To return to my first post - matplotlib aims to make simple things simple - I would argue that the way tickmarks are currently dealt with is NOT simple & it would be great to see some simplifications or additions to the interface to deal with the issues raised in this thread (for example, by aligning their behaviour and properties to=20 other, similar, chart properties). Thanks again, Derek >>> Jouni K Sepp=E4nen <jk...@ik...> 2006/08/23 08:52 AM >>> [Again copying to matplotlib-users; maybe the main developers can=20=20 comment on whether these shortcomings in the getp/setp interface=20=20 should be fixed.] Hi Derek, > It does seem as those these settings affect the top and bottom of=20=20 > the graph - I was wondering if it was possible to show tickmarks=20=20 > along the bottom edge but not the top edge? I don't think that's directly supported. Here's a hacky way to do it: lines =3D getp(gca(), 'xticklines') toplines =3D [ l for l in lines if getp(l, 'ydata') =3D=3D (1,) ] setp(toplines, visible=3DFalse) How I came up with this: I knew that I wanted to make some of the=20=20 xticklines invisible, so I looked at the list of line objects for=20=20 clues as to what differs between them. They seem to have xdata and=20=20 ydata properties, and ydata is (0,) for half of the lines and (1,)=20=20 for the other half, so it looks like it is the vertical position in=20=20 axis coordinates. (xdata seems to be in data coordinates.) > And the other property I do not see on the list is the one that=20=20 > shows whether a tick goes "into" the graph or just "out" - in the=20=20 > prc file, there is a line: > xtick.direction : in # direction: in or out > but there is no "direction' property? You're right, there is no obvious property to control this. Here's an=20=20 even hackier way to do this (and one that doesn't look very future-=20 proof): for l in getp(gca(), 'xticklines'): setp(l, 'marker', 5-getp(l, 'marker')) The line objects have a marker property, which is 2 for some markers=20=20 and 3 for the others... so I guessed that one of them means upwards=20=20 and the other downwards, and checked this guess by flipping the=20=20 xtick.direction parameter and looking again. So subtracting the=20=20 marker from 5 flips the direction. I wonder how this is done in Matlab? > label: any string > > which shows me that the Yaxis has a label - in this case a > string - but I do not see how one can set the font properties > for the Yaxis label as it is not Text object?? I think you cannot do this with setp alone. Use the ylabel command: ylabel('foo bar', fontsize=3D18) --=20 Jouni ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easi= er Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D1= 21642=20 _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-users mailing list Mat...@li...=20 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users --=20 This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright, terms and conditions and e-mail legal notice. Views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the CSIR. =20 CSIR E-mail Legal Notice http://mail.csir.co.za/CSIR_eMail_Legal_Notice.html=20 =20 CSIR Copyright, Terms and Conditions http://mail.csir.co.za/CSIR_Copyright.html=20 =20 For electronic copies of the CSIR Copyright, Terms and Conditions and the C= SIR Legal Notice send a blank message with REQUEST LEGAL in the subject line to Cal...@cs.... This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScan= ner,=20 and is believed to be clean. |
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2006-08-25 07:55:42
|
Jordan Dawe wrote: > So I have a contourf plot and I am resetting the ylims so as to only > display a subset of the full contourf plot. Is there anyway to set norm > and the colorbar so they take their colormapping settings using the data > currently on display? By which I mean: the full dataset has a range of > 260-320. The reset axes limits display a region that only has values > between 280-310. I'd like the colormap to extend over this range of > values automatically, without having to set vmin=280, vmax=310. Any way > to do that? Jordan, I don't think so; and although I have not thought hard about it, my impression is that adding this capability would take a lot of work and redesign. I expect that in most cases what you describe would not be the desired behavior, so it would have to be a non-default option. Eric |
From: Michael F. <mp...@be...> - 2006-08-25 02:16:37
|
Hi all, Sometime in the past couple months, there's been a change in SVN that's causing me problems when trying to hide tick labels. I think the problem is related to the get_xticklabels()/get_yticklabels() methods of the Axes class, in that they only return a list consisting of a single tick label no matter how many there should be. I'm encountering this problem in SVN rev. 2706. Here is some example code: from pylab import * # set up a plot x = arange(5) ax = subplot(111) ax.plot(x, x) # hide the first tick label on the x axis xtl = ax.get_xticklabels() xtl[0].set_visible(False) print len(xtl) ax.set_xlabel('foo') show() For me, no x tick labels are drawn, and the length of xtl is one instead of the expected 9. Can anyone reproduce this? Mike |
From: Jordan D. <jd...@eo...> - 2006-08-25 00:13:15
|
So I have a contourf plot and I am resetting the ylims so as to only display a subset of the full contourf plot. Is there anyway to set norm and the colorbar so they take their colormapping settings using the data currently on display? By which I mean: the full dataset has a range of 260-320. The reset axes limits display a region that only has values between 280-310. I'd like the colormap to extend over this range of values automatically, without having to set vmin=280, vmax=310. Any way to do that? Jordan |