You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
(2) |
2
(3) |
3
(7) |
4
(8) |
5
(10) |
6
(4) |
7
|
|
8
|
9
(13) |
10
(1) |
11
(10) |
12
(4) |
13
|
14
|
|
15
|
16
(1) |
17
|
18
(3) |
19
(7) |
20
|
21
(4) |
|
22
|
23
(14) |
24
(5) |
25
(3) |
26
(3) |
27
(8) |
28
(1) |
|
29
(3) |
30
(2) |
31
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
From: Sandro T. <mo...@de...> - 2009-03-06 23:06:39
|
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 23:00, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote:
> Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 22:12, Sandro Tosi <mo...@de...> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> import wxversion
>>>>>> wxversion.select('2.8')
>>>>>> from wx import *
>>>>>> wx.__version__
>>>
>>> '2.8.7.1'
>>>
>>> That solves the problem of multi-wx on a system.
>>>
>>> What do you think about adding those 2 line into wx examples?
>>
>> Moreover, I will provide a patch to move from
>>
>>>>> from wx import *
>>
>> to
>>
>>>>> import wx
>>
>> that's much more clear. Just let me know if in the patch I will add
>> the wxversion.select or no.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> Sounds good to me, but I am not a wx user, so I might be missing something.
> The only reservation that occurs to me is this: suppose version 2.10 comes
> out, and someone has only that installed. Is there a way to select 2.8 or
> higher, instead of requiring 2.8?
AFAIUI, it's not possible to say "2.8+" == "2.8 and all the higher
versions", but we can specify a list of version to be searched, the
first match is the one "mapped" as default wx. If no-one of the
specified version are available, then an exception is thrown:
>>> import wxversion
>>> wxversion.select(['2.5','2.3','2.9'])
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/wxversion.py", line 149, in select
raise VersionError("Requested version of wxPython not found")
wxversion.VersionError: Requested version of wxPython not found
>>> wxversion.select(['2.5','2.3','2.8'])
>>> import wx
>>> wx.__version__
'2.8.7.1'
In any case, the example code doesn't work with wx2.6 so, as even a
temporary workaround, I think we should enforce the needs for wx2.8.
Cheers,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
|
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2009-03-06 22:00:58
|
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 22:12, Sandro Tosi <mo...@de...> wrote:
>>>>> import wxversion
>>>>> wxversion.select('2.8')
>>>>> from wx import *
>>>>> wx.__version__
>> '2.8.7.1'
>>
>> That solves the problem of multi-wx on a system.
>>
>> What do you think about adding those 2 line into wx examples?
>
> Moreover, I will provide a patch to move from
>
>>>> from wx import *
>
> to
>
>>>> import wx
>
> that's much more clear. Just let me know if in the patch I will add
> the wxversion.select or no.
>
> Regards,
Sounds good to me, but I am not a wx user, so I might be missing
something. The only reservation that occurs to me is this: suppose
version 2.10 comes out, and someone has only that installed. Is there a
way to select 2.8 or higher, instead of requiring 2.8?
Eric
|
|
From: Sandro T. <mo...@de...> - 2009-03-06 21:24:29
|
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 22:12, Sandro Tosi <mo...@de...> wrote:
>>>> import wxversion
>>>> wxversion.select('2.8')
>>>> from wx import *
>>>> wx.__version__
> '2.8.7.1'
>
> That solves the problem of multi-wx on a system.
>
> What do you think about adding those 2 line into wx examples?
Moreover, I will provide a patch to move from
>>> from wx import *
to
>>> import wx
that's much more clear. Just let me know if in the patch I will add
the wxversion.select or no.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
|
|
From: Sandro T. <mo...@de...> - 2009-03-06 21:12:30
|
Hello,
we are facing a problem in Debian where a user has problems running
embedding_in_wx*.py examples.
The problem is:
>>> from wx import *
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute '__DocFilter'
>>> import wx
>>> print wx.__version__
2.6.3.2
Since WX2.8 is the one to use, the solution is simple:
>>> import wxversion
>>> wxversion.select('2.8')
>>> from wx import *
>>> wx.__version__
'2.8.7.1'
That solves the problem of multi-wx on a system.
What do you think about adding those 2 line into wx examples?
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
|