You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
|
2
(3) |
3
(3) |
4
|
5
(2) |
6
(7) |
7
(1) |
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
(1) |
12
|
13
(1) |
14
(1) |
15
|
16
(2) |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
(3) |
21
(1) |
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
(2) |
|
|
|
|
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2013-12-31 18:21:46
|
Yes. matplotlib can not read the otf format fonts that are generally shipped as part of the STIX font packages. You need the ones that come with matplotlib. Mike On 12/31/2013 11:59 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > If I rely on the system version of matplotlib > > python-matplotlib-1.3.0-1.fc20.x86_64 > > stix fonts are not found > > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/font_manager.py:1236: UserWarning: > findfont: Font family ['STIXGeneral'] not found. Falling back to Bitstream Vera > Sans > (prop.get_family(), self.defaultFamily[fontext])) > > No I do: > > pip install --user --up matplotlib > > And after rm ~/.matplotlib/fontList.cache stix fonts are found. > > Now I look in ~/.matplotlib/fontList.cache and I find > > /home/nbecker/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/mpl- > data/fonts/ttf/STIXGeneralBol.ttf' > > So it seems it now works because the font is now installed. > > But I already had: > > rpm -qa '*stix*' > stix-math-fonts-1.1.0-5.fc20.noarch > texlive-stix-svn29803.1.0-3.fc20.noarch > stix-fonts-1.1.0-5.fc20.noarch > > rpm -ql texlive-stix > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/public/stix/STIXGeneral.otf > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/public/stix/STIXGeneralBol.otf > > So it seems, matplotlib requires .ttf format fonts? Or perhaps the system > didn't know how to find the fonts from texlive-stix package? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel -- _ |\/|o _|_ _. _ | | \.__ __|__|_|_ _ _ ._ _ | ||(_| |(_|(/_| |_/|(_)(/_|_ |_|_)(_)(_)| | | http://www.droettboom.com |
From: Neal B. <ndb...@gm...> - 2013-12-31 16:59:42
|
If I rely on the system version of matplotlib python-matplotlib-1.3.0-1.fc20.x86_64 stix fonts are not found /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/font_manager.py:1236: UserWarning: findfont: Font family ['STIXGeneral'] not found. Falling back to Bitstream Vera Sans (prop.get_family(), self.defaultFamily[fontext])) No I do: pip install --user --up matplotlib And after rm ~/.matplotlib/fontList.cache stix fonts are found. Now I look in ~/.matplotlib/fontList.cache and I find /home/nbecker/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/mpl- data/fonts/ttf/STIXGeneralBol.ttf' So it seems it now works because the font is now installed. But I already had: rpm -qa '*stix*' stix-math-fonts-1.1.0-5.fc20.noarch texlive-stix-svn29803.1.0-3.fc20.noarch stix-fonts-1.1.0-5.fc20.noarch rpm -ql texlive-stix /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/public/stix/STIXGeneral.otf /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/public/stix/STIXGeneralBol.otf So it seems, matplotlib requires .ttf format fonts? Or perhaps the system didn't know how to find the fonts from texlive-stix package? |