You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
|
2
(2) |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
(1) |
|
7
|
8
|
9
(2) |
10
(6) |
11
(4) |
12
|
13
(3) |
|
14
(2) |
15
(7) |
16
(1) |
17
(1) |
18
(9) |
19
(2) |
20
(4) |
|
21
(6) |
22
(6) |
23
(7) |
24
(8) |
25
(5) |
26
(7) |
27
(7) |
|
28
(1) |
29
(2) |
30
(16) |
31
(3) |
|
|
|
|
From: Darren D. <dd...@co...> - 2006-05-20 19:59:10
|
On Saturday 20 May 2006 15:47, Eric Firing wrote: > Darren Dale wrote: > > I have used floats to indicate color in many of my own scripts. I think > > changing this would have a pretty big impact on the users. > > > > Darren > > Darren, > > Float as greyscale, right? Yes, that's what I meant. > Yes, I am concerned about breaking things, but maybe it is not too late > to deprecate it, so that the transition could be made some time in the > future. I think it is worth considering this carefully now, while we > are still pre-1.0. slightly off-topic: Will mpl ever go 1.0? That's not meant to be flippant. I thought their was some pride in being beta. > >>John, > >> > >>I think all the ambiguity that you mention below comes from one source: > >>the use of a single float to indicate a greyscale. Do we really need > >>this? It is not supported by colors.looks_like_color(). It could be > >>replaced by a string representation of the float (e.g., '0.75') or by a > >>more specific string, such as 'g0.75' or 'grey0.75'. I think this would > >>be a big net gain for mpl. We lose a lot of flexibility, convenience, > >>and consistency by allowing the float-is-grey form. > >> > >>Eric > >> > >>John Hunter wrote: > >>>>>>>>"Eric" == Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> writes: > >>> > >>> Eric> John, Collections would be easier to use if they did not > >>> Eric> have the restriction (from the docstring): > >>> > >>> Eric> All color args to a collection are sequences of rgba > >>> Eric> tuples > >>> > >>> Eric> It would be easy to remove this restriction; shall I do it, > >>> Eric> or is there a reason to leave the restriction in place? > >>> Eric> (The error message that results from violating the > >>> Eric> restriction is not helpful, and it would be as easy to > >>> Eric> remove the restriction as to improve the error handling.) > >>> > >>>I think it's fine to remove it, but note that you have to be careful > >>>to avoid ambiguity. How would you interpret > >>> > >>> color = (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0) > >>> > >>>Is this one rgba color or 4 grayscales? > >>> > >>>Because mpl accepts lots of different types of args for colors, there > >>>will probably be some ambiguous cases, thought these will be very rare > >>>corner cases. Just document what the behavior is, and everyone should > >>>be happy. I think you could do the same for the linewidths, etc. Eg > >>>if scalar, interpret as a single linewidth for all elements of the > >>>collection? > >>> > >>>Or were you intending to preserve the requirement that one pass > >>>sequences, but allow versatile color args in the sequence? > >>> > >>>JDH > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------- > >>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > >>Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > >>easier > >>Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > >> Geronimo > >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > >> _______________________________________________ > >>Matplotlib-devel mailing list > >>Mat...@li... > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel -- Darren S. Dale, Ph.D. Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source Cornell University 200L Wilson Lab Rt. 366 & Pine Tree Road Ithaca, NY 14853 dd...@co... office: (607) 255-9894 fax: (607) 255-9001 |
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2006-05-20 19:47:32
|
Darren Dale wrote: > I have used floats to indicate color in many of my own scripts. I think > changing this would have a pretty big impact on the users. > > Darren Darren, Float as greyscale, right? Yes, I am concerned about breaking things, but maybe it is not too late to deprecate it, so that the transition could be made some time in the future. I think it is worth considering this carefully now, while we are still pre-1.0. Eric > > >>John, >> >>I think all the ambiguity that you mention below comes from one source: >>the use of a single float to indicate a greyscale. Do we really need >>this? It is not supported by colors.looks_like_color(). It could be >>replaced by a string representation of the float (e.g., '0.75') or by a >>more specific string, such as 'g0.75' or 'grey0.75'. I think this would >>be a big net gain for mpl. We lose a lot of flexibility, convenience, >>and consistency by allowing the float-is-grey form. >> >>Eric >> >>John Hunter wrote: >> >>>>>>>>"Eric" == Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> writes: >>> >>> >>> Eric> John, Collections would be easier to use if they did not >>> Eric> have the restriction (from the docstring): >>> >>> Eric> All color args to a collection are sequences of rgba >>> Eric> tuples >>> >>> Eric> It would be easy to remove this restriction; shall I do it, >>> Eric> or is there a reason to leave the restriction in place? >>> Eric> (The error message that results from violating the >>> Eric> restriction is not helpful, and it would be as easy to >>> Eric> remove the restriction as to improve the error handling.) >>> >>>I think it's fine to remove it, but note that you have to be careful >>>to avoid ambiguity. How would you interpret >>> >>> color = (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0) >>> >>>Is this one rgba color or 4 grayscales? >>> >>>Because mpl accepts lots of different types of args for colors, there >>>will probably be some ambiguous cases, thought these will be very rare >>>corner cases. Just document what the behavior is, and everyone should >>>be happy. I think you could do the same for the linewidths, etc. Eg >>>if scalar, interpret as a single linewidth for all elements of the >>>collection? >>> >>>Or were you intending to preserve the requirement that one pass >>>sequences, but allow versatile color args in the sequence? >>> >>>JDH >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? >>Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >>easier >>Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo >>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >>_______________________________________________ >>Matplotlib-devel mailing list >>Mat...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel >> > > > |
|
From: Darren D. <dd...@co...> - 2006-05-20 19:30:25
|
I have used floats to indicate color in many of my own scripts. I think changing this would have a pretty big impact on the users. Darren > John, > > I think all the ambiguity that you mention below comes from one source: > the use of a single float to indicate a greyscale. Do we really need > this? It is not supported by colors.looks_like_color(). It could be > replaced by a string representation of the float (e.g., '0.75') or by a > more specific string, such as 'g0.75' or 'grey0.75'. I think this would > be a big net gain for mpl. We lose a lot of flexibility, convenience, > and consistency by allowing the float-is-grey form. > > Eric > > John Hunter wrote: >>>>>>>"Eric" == Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> writes: >> >> >> Eric> John, Collections would be easier to use if they did not >> Eric> have the restriction (from the docstring): >> >> Eric> All color args to a collection are sequences of rgba >> Eric> tuples >> >> Eric> It would be easy to remove this restriction; shall I do it, >> Eric> or is there a reason to leave the restriction in place? >> Eric> (The error message that results from violating the >> Eric> restriction is not helpful, and it would be as easy to >> Eric> remove the restriction as to improve the error handling.) >> >> I think it's fine to remove it, but note that you have to be careful >> to avoid ambiguity. How would you interpret >> >> color = (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0) >> >> Is this one rgba color or 4 grayscales? >> >> Because mpl accepts lots of different types of args for colors, there >> will probably be some ambiguous cases, thought these will be very rare >> corner cases. Just document what the behavior is, and everyone should >> be happy. I think you could do the same for the linewidths, etc. Eg >> if scalar, interpret as a single linewidth for all elements of the >> collection? >> >> Or were you intending to preserve the requirement that one pass >> sequences, but allow versatile color args in the sequence? >> >> JDH > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > |
|
From: Eric F. <ef...@ha...> - 2006-05-20 19:10:53
|
John, I think all the ambiguity that you mention below comes from one source: the use of a single float to indicate a greyscale. Do we really need this? It is not supported by colors.looks_like_color(). It could be replaced by a string representation of the float (e.g., '0.75') or by a more specific string, such as 'g0.75' or 'grey0.75'. I think this would be a big net gain for mpl. We lose a lot of flexibility, convenience, and consistency by allowing the float-is-grey form. Eric John Hunter wrote: >>>>>>"Eric" == Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> writes: > > > Eric> John, Collections would be easier to use if they did not > Eric> have the restriction (from the docstring): > > Eric> All color args to a collection are sequences of rgba > Eric> tuples > > Eric> It would be easy to remove this restriction; shall I do it, > Eric> or is there a reason to leave the restriction in place? > Eric> (The error message that results from violating the > Eric> restriction is not helpful, and it would be as easy to > Eric> remove the restriction as to improve the error handling.) > > I think it's fine to remove it, but note that you have to be careful > to avoid ambiguity. How would you interpret > > color = (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0) > > Is this one rgba color or 4 grayscales? > > Because mpl accepts lots of different types of args for colors, there > will probably be some ambiguous cases, thought these will be very rare > corner cases. Just document what the behavior is, and everyone should > be happy. I think you could do the same for the linewidths, etc. Eg > if scalar, interpret as a single linewidth for all elements of the > collection? > > Or were you intending to preserve the requirement that one pass > sequences, but allow versatile color args in the sequence? > > JDH |