You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(15) |
2
|
3
(1) |
4
|
5
(1) |
6
(3) |
7
|
8
(2) |
9
|
10
|
11
(2) |
12
|
13
(7) |
14
(2) |
15
|
16
(3) |
17
(2) |
18
(1) |
19
(7) |
20
(2) |
21
|
22
(6) |
23
|
24
|
25
(1) |
26
(6) |
27
(2) |
28
(7) |
29
|
30
(5) |
31
(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Jared W. <wah...@um...> - 2004-10-01 22:49:01
|
Yeah, now I remember installing those fonts a while ago so I could put symbols in my diagrams in inkscape... For embedding, we need SVG fonts. Would it be kosher to just use this: http://xml.apache.org/batik/ttf2svg.html or its equivalent to convert the BaKoMa fonts to SVG, and then include the resulting SVG fonts in the matplotlib package? Jared > Hmm, this is strange and intriguing. I notice that you do not embed > the fonts in your svg document, which is presumably why most viewers > can't handle it. I confirmed that librsvg, which gqview uses, can't > render the fonts either. The question is, why can Inkscape do it? I > downloaded Inkscape and did a recursive grep through their src as well > as a find in the root of their src tree and found no references to > 'computer modern' or cmex, etc.... Did you have to set some path in > inkscape to see your cm fonts, or did you put them in some standard > place? Anyone have any ideas how inkscape manages to pull off this > trick? > Jared> John, are there any more features still missing from the > Jared> SVG backend? > > That almost does it. I think we need an option to embed the fonts > directly into the svg document like we do for PS, because I think > viewers that have the cm* fonts built in will be the exception rather > than the rule. Fernando Perez has some colleagues who are interested > in embedding clickable tags in svg, but I haven't heard much from > them. > > But overall SVG is in fine shape. |
From: John H. <jdh...@ac...> - 2004-10-01 22:22:29
|
>>>>> "Jared" == Jared Wahlstrand <wah...@um...> writes: Jared> Hello, The attached patches implement mathtext for SVG. The Jared> output looks pretty good when viewed by Inkscape, but not Jared> the Adobe SVG viewer (it shows the wrong symbols and then Jared> moments later crashes Mozilla, at least on my system). It Jared> hasn't been thoroughly tested for all of the possible Jared> symbols. Hmm, this is strange and intriguing. I notice that you do not embed the fonts in your svg document, which is presumably why most viewers can't handle it. I confirmed that librsvg, which gqview uses, can't render the fonts either. The question is, why can Inkscape do it? I downloaded Inkscape and did a recursive grep through their src as well as a find in the root of their src tree and found no references to 'computer modern' or cmex, etc.... Did you have to set some path in inkscape to see your cm fonts, or did you put them in some standard place? Anyone have any ideas how inkscape manages to pull off this trick? Jared> I had to add a math_parse_s_ft2font_svg() to mathtext.py, Jared> which basically does the same thing as Jared> math_parse_s_ft2font() but returns something different. I Jared> tried to just modify the latter function to take a Jared> "usingSVG=True" argument and ran into all sorts of bizarre Jared> problems, probably associated with the caching, and gave Jared> up. Perhaps someone can figure out how to do this more Jared> elegantly. Probably the best way to do this is to subclass BakomaTrueTypeFonts and override the just methods you need. Jared> John, are there any more features still missing from the Jared> SVG backend? That almost does it. I think we need an option to embed the fonts directly into the svg document like we do for PS, because I think viewers that have the cm* fonts built in will be the exception rather than the rule. Fernando Perez has some colleagues who are interested in embedding clickable tags in svg, but I haven't heard much from them. But overall SVG is in fine shape. Many thanks! JDH |
From: Jared W. <wah...@um...> - 2004-10-01 21:30:06
|
Hello, The attached patches implement mathtext for SVG. The output looks pretty good when viewed by Inkscape, but not the Adobe SVG viewer (it shows the wrong symbols and then moments later crashes Mozilla, at least on my system). It hasn't been thoroughly tested for all of the possible symbols. I had to add a math_parse_s_ft2font_svg() to mathtext.py, which basically does the same thing as math_parse_s_ft2font() but returns something different. I tried to just modify the latter function to take a "usingSVG=True" argument and ran into all sorts of bizarre problems, probably associated with the caching, and gave up. Perhaps someone can figure out how to do this more elegantly. John, are there any more features still missing from the SVG backend? Cheers, Jared |
From: Chris <rea...@po...> - 2004-10-01 21:23:44
|
My system is set up so that when I am logged into root (via su) the root user cannot access the X display. I like this behavior but it means that I cannot install matplotlib as the root user (I can use sudo) because setup.py wants to import pygtk and wxPython both of which try to connect to the X display. It seems to me that it is unnecessary to connect to the display to compile the matplotlib extensions, rather the import gtk command exists to test to see if the pygtk package is installed. If I am wrong then this does not matter. I thought that the build procedure would be more robust is it was not necessary to import the whole pygtk and wxPython packages in order to test for their presence. Is there a standard way to test for the presence of a package without actually importing it? I know that I could temporarily export a display for the root user - but I don't want to and I don't think it should be necessary if it is not required. I have been thinking about ways to test for packages without importing them. Would it be possible to test for the offending packges by importing subpackages that do not connect to the X server? For example in the case of pygtk 'gobject' can be imported successfully when no X display is available. (This works on my system because pygtk-2.0 is part of the python path - I did not put it there so I assume that is standard - if not this procedure would require that the appropriate directory was appended to then removed from the python path.) The disadvantages that I can see are that it would make the build procedure dependant on the naming of subpackages within a package and it would not actually check for a working installation just the presence of a certain package. I guess it depends how great the demand is to be able to install matplotlib from an environment that does not have a X display. Cheers Chris |
From: Curtis C. <cu...@hi...> - 2004-10-01 19:43:43
|
Dear Mr. Horton: I am investigating options for creating 2D contour plots for the freely distributable Matplotlib package (http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/). The Matplotlib license requires all the software to be free for noncommercial and commercial distribution. I had the idea to try to implement marching squares for this package. We know the marching cubes algorithm is patented, but what about the 2D marching squares? Can my implementation be used in this freely distributed package without obtaining a license grant? Thanks, Curtis * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Curtis S. Cooper, Graduate Research Assistant * * Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona * * http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~curtis/ * * Kuiper Space Sciences, Rm. 318 * * 1629 E. University Blvd., * * Tucson, AZ 85721 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Wk: (520) 621-1471 * * * * * * * * * * * * * |
From: Helge A. <av...@ii...> - 2004-10-01 16:52:23
|
John Hunter <jdh...@ac...> writes: | | Do you have any thoughts on how we might do labels with your code? 2 ways: 1) automatically: define a coarser(user defined coarseness) mesh on the function to be labelled, and add the labels in the vertices of this mesh. the angle of each label can easily be found from the closest contour line segment. this method avoids clusters of labels effectively, but will not be good in areas with high variability. 2) manually: let the user point and click on contours, I implemented this for use with gist that you could take a look at (clabel below). matlab also does this, and I think this is the best way for real publication quality. I have never seen automatic routines that do labelling well. TECPLOT is close but not quite there. I also attached a routine to do this for 2D stretched coordinates (see the contour plots with labels on http://www.ii.uib.no/~avle/python.html for examples) which is called vclabel | | If we decide to go with your routines, at least for the time being | until we can "do it right", would you be willing to contribute your | code to matplotlib under the matplotlib license (PSF inspired, free | for commercial and noncommercial reuse)? sure, no problem. Helge def clabel(z,clevels,opa=1,col='black',meth='std',digits=1): """ clabel(z,clevels,opa=1,col='black') At the point where the mouse is clicked, print the contour level from clevels that are closest to the interpolated value in this point. Meant to be useful for labeling contour lines manually... optional arguments: opa=0 : Transparent text. opa=1 : Erase background under label col='white' : text color. meth= 'std' bilinear interpo on a std grid, might give error near coast 'grid' values not given cellcentered but on corners of cells. 'bigrid' values taken from a bilinearly interpol fine mesh from futil.contour 'cell' takes value from cell directly Helge Avlesen <av...@ii...> """ print """ Insert contour levels by left clicking, middle button display values, right button finishes. """ button=0 while button<>3: mus=gist.mouse() button=mus[9] if meth=='bigrid': i=int(2*mus[0])+1 ; j=int(2*mus[1])+1 x=2*mus[0]-i+1 ; y=2*mus[1]-j+1 elif meth=='std': i=int( mus[0] ); j=int( mus[1] ) x=mus[0]-i ; y=mus[1]-j elif meth=='grid': xm=mus[0]+0.5 ; ym=mus[1]+0.5 i=int( xm ); j=int( ym ) x=xm-i ; y=ym-j elif meth=='cell': print mus[0], mus[1] i=int(round(mus[0])) ; j=int(round(mus[1])) if meth=='cell': val=z[i,j] print val,i,j else: # bilinear interpolation to find value a00=z[i,j] a10=z[i+1,j]-a00 a01=z[i,j+1]-a00 a11=z[i+1,j+1]-(a00+a10+a01) val=a00 + a10*x + a01*y + a11*x*y print val,i,j,x,y if button==1: # compare this value to the selected levels diff= abs( clevels-val ) # use the closest label=fpformat.fix( clevels[ Numeric.argmin(diff) ], digits ) gist.plt(label, mus[0], mus[1], opaque=opa, tosys=1, \ height=8, justify="CH", color=col ) def vclabel(z,sx,sy,clevels,opa=1,col='black',digits=1): """ manual(z,clevels,opa=1,col='black') At the point where the mouse is clicked, print the contour level from clevels that are closest to the interpolated value in this point. Meant to be useful for labeling contour lines manually... sx[i,j],sy[i,j] is the x,z coordinate of point z[i,j]. if [:,1] denotes the top layer, [:,kb-1] the bottom (common in oceanography) j_is_down will be true. (z is always positive in the upward direction, but the indice j may go downwards) optional arguments: opa=0 : Transparent text. opa=1 : Use background color for text. col='white' : text color. digits: number of decimals in label Helge Avlesen <av...@ii...> """ print """ Insert contour levels by left clicking, middle button display depth, right button finishes. """ kb=z.shape[1] im=z.shape[0] j_is_down=0 if sy[0,0]>sy[0,1]: j_is_down=1 button=0 while button<>3: mus=gist.mouse() button=mus[9] # bisection search for the indices i=hbisect( sx[:,0], mus[0] ) if i<0 or i>im-1: print 'outside:',i continue x=(mus[0]-sx[i,0])/(sx[i+1,0]-sx[i,0]) if j_is_down: finn=hbisect( (1.-x)*sy[i,::-1] + x*sy[i+1,::-1] , mus[1] ) j=kb-2-finn if finn<0 or finn>kb-1: print 'outside',i,finn continue xa=Numeric.array((sx[i,j+1]+x*(sx[i+1,j+1]-sx[i,j+1]),\ sy[i,j+1]+x*(sy[i+1,j+1]-sy[i,j+1]))) if mus[1]-xa[1]<0: print 'below' continue xb=Numeric.array((sx[i,j]+x*(sx[i+1,j]-sx[i,j]),\ sy[i,j]+x*(sy[i+1,j]-sy[i,j]))) y=(((mus[0]-xa[0])**2 + (mus[1]-xa[1])**2 )\ /((xb[0]-xa[0])**2 + (xb[1]-xa[1])**2 ))**0.5 # bilinear interpolation to find value a1=z[i,j+1] a2=z[i+1,j+1]-a1 a3=z[i,j]-a1 a4=z[i+1,j]-(a1+a2+a3) val=a1 + a2*x + a3*y + a4*x*y else: print 'increasing j upwards not yet implemented' continue print 'x,y=',x,y,' i,j=',i,j, 'val=',val if button==1: # compare this value to the selected levels diff= abs( clevels-val ) # use the closest label=fpformat.fix( clevels[ Numeric.argmin(diff) ], 1) if opa==1: label=' '+label+' ' gist.plt(label, mus[0], mus[1], opaque=opa, tosys=1, \ height=8, justify="CH", color=col ) |
From: Fernando P. <Fer...@co...> - 2004-10-01 16:40:12
|
John Hunter schrieb: >>>>>>"Fernando" =3D=3D Fernando Perez <Fer...@co...> writ= es: >=20 >=20 > Fernando> I think we're doing pretty good, except that people can > Fernando> always kill themselves by running true WX/GTK apps via > Fernando> @run. IPython is really not made for this, it can only > Fernando> handle gracefully show() calls from pure matplotlib > Fernando> scripts, not full-blown GUI apps. But I think we have a > Fernando> very reasonable environment at this point for most usage > Fernando> cases. >=20 > It's looks like about 90% of your problems result from trying to cross > GUI backends within IPython. Is this fair to say? Well, not quite. As I mentioned, I put in a matplotlib.use() wrapper whi= ch=20 traps invalid switches, so it's not a problem if a use() call is made. C= ould=20 you add such a call to this one please? : // OK with GTKAgg backend. It needs a use('GTKAgg') call to be safe for o= ther backends. run dynamic_image_gtkagg.py It's only when native GUI examples are run that things crash badly. Note= that=20 some of the segfaults occur from plain python: // these are OK with gtkagg, but they segfault wxagg. The segfault happe= ns from a normal command line as well (no ipython). run system_monitor.py run dynamic_demo.py And I also have these: // these two run but segfault on exit under ipython. They run OK from a = cmd line. run dynamic_demo_wx.py run dynamic_image_wxagg.py I suspect these two are messing something up badly enough that if python = quits=20 right away, you don't see the problem, but since ipython continues to run= the=20 interpreter, the problem appears. Since these are segfaults, I'm very mu= ch=20 willing to blame the wx code in there, and not ipython (which is 100% pur= e,=20 unpolluted python :) > As far as I'm concerned I don't have a problem with these cases. > Caveat emptor -- the user should be forewarned and expect disaster if > they try and run GUI specific examples from ipython. Perhaps you > should say pylab only supports pure matlab interface matplotlib at > this point. >=20 >>From your end I see why it's a concern - you don't want any run > command to break or freeze ipython. If you have any ideas on what we > should do I'll be happy to help on the matplotlib end, but I don't > have any off the top of my head. Yes, this is the real nasty. If you think that the ipython+matplotlib=20 combination is going to be a common one in the future for scientists, it = may=20 be worth protecting the examples against disaster (given they tend to be = what=20 people run to first). If you are willing to pay the price of 12 lines of= code=20 per example, you could put this snippet at the beginning of _every_ embed= ded=20 example: # Detect if we are inside IPython and bail if so. Threading problems # make it very difficult to safely run full GTK/WX apps inside IPython. try: __IPYTHON__ msg =3D ("This script can NOT be run inside IPython.\n\n" "It embeds matplotlib into a complete GUI application, and\n" "for a number of reasons this is (and probably will remain)\n= " "unsupported from inside IPython.\n\n" "You can run it from the command line as a regular python scr= ipt.\n") raise RuntimeError,msg except NameError: pass This will make sure that users get a meaningful error message inside ipyt= hon=20 instead of a bizarre lockup or segfault. > I'll comment on some of the non cross-GUI problems below.... >=20 > Fernando> // These don't run with LANG=3D=3Dde_DE.UTF-8, but are OK > Fernando> with en_US.UTF-8 run date_demo_convert.py run > Fernando> date_demo1.py run date_demo2.py run date_demo_rrule.py > Fernando> run finance_demo.py >=20 > Do they run from the shell with LANG=3D=3Dde_DE.UTF-8? Any idea what i= s > going wrong? Yes, the problem has nothing to do with ipython, it also happens with pla= in=20 python. Note that the broken ones are: // These don't run with LANG=3D=3Dde_DE.UTF-8, but are OK with en_US.UTF-= 8 run date_demo1.py run date_demo2.py run finance_demo.py I think my original list had more by mistake. Here's a traceback (form=20 ipython, so you get better details): In [5]: run date_demo1.py -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -- ValueError Traceback (most recent call las= t) /home/fperez/code/python/pylab/examples/date_demo1.py 26 yearsFmt =3D DateFormatter('%Y') 27 ---> 28 quotes =3D quotes_historical_yahoo( 29 'INTC', date1, date2) 30 if not quotes: /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/matplotlib/finance.py in=20 quotes_historical_yahoo(ticker, date1, date2) 61 if len(vals)!=3D7: continue 62 datestr =3D vals[0] ---> 63 dt =3D datetime.date(*time.strptime(datestr, '%d-%b-%y')[= :3]) 64 d =3D date2num(dt) 65 open, high, low, close =3D [float(val) for val in vals[= 1:5]] /usr/src/build/394694-i386/install/usr/lib/python2.3/_strptime.py in=20 strptime(data_string, format) 422 found =3D format_regex.match(data_string) 423 if not found: --> 424 raise ValueError("time data did not match format: data=3D= %s=20 fmt=3D%s" % 425 (data_string, format)) 426 if len(data_string) !=3D found.end(): ValueError: time data did not match format: data=3D31-Mar-04 fmt=3D%d-%= b-%y WARNING: Failure executing file: <date_demo1.py> The problem is that under different locales, dates come out formatted=20 differently. You seem to have hardcoded format expectations which break = in=20 the face of non-US locales. > Fernando> run print_stdout.py >=20 > This is an example script to show how to print png to stdout from agg. > Perhaps this fails because ipython doesn't really expect a png coming > in from stdout? The header of that file states Well, running it again I'm getting this: Exception in thread Thread-1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/src/build/394694-i386/install/usr/lib/python2.3/threading.p= y",=20 line 436, in __bootstrap self.run() File "/home/fperez/code/python/IPython/Shell.py", line 527, in run self.IP.mainloop() File "/home/fperez/code/python/IPython/iplib.py", line 948, in mainloo= p self.interact(banner) File "/home/fperez/code/python/IPython/iplib.py", line 1036, in intera= ct line =3D self.raw_input(prompt) File "/home/fperez/code/python/IPython/iplib.py", line 1263, in raw_in= put return self.prefilter(raw_input(prompt), IOError: [Errno 9] Ung=FCltiger Dateideskriptor Pehaps you could add (if you decide that you like that idea) the __IPYTHO= N__=20 trap code to this as well, so that all examples are made ipython-friendly= . In=20 this one, the message could additionally show this: print png to standard out usage: python print_stdout.py > somefile.png so users know what to do straight away. > Thanks for the detailed notes. No prob. I'm a big believer that good examples are what helps most new u= sers,=20 so I'm trying to make sure that out-of-the-box, things run as smoothly as= =20 possible for all those scientists who are just dying to start using matpl= otlib=20 with ipython :) Best, f |
From: John H. <jdh...@ac...> - 2004-10-01 16:37:29
|
>>>>> "Perry" == Perry Greenfield <pe...@st...> writes: >> Hi again, >> >> Yes, I had the thought that using C for the algorithm would be >> easier as well. There are actually some very well-written >> marching squares contouring algorithms in C already out there. >> I will try to find such an implementation and point you to it >> or send you the source code. >> Perry> Thanks, that would be helpful. In my search I didn't come Perry> across many. Keep in mind the license needs to be Perry> compatible with that of matplotlib. Of course, in addition to the license, there is the patent issue. I believe marching squares is patented. I know marching cubes is. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,710,876.WKU.&OS=PN/4,710,876&RS=PN/4,710,876 I checked the header of vtkMarchingSquares.cxx which states Program: Visualization Toolkit Module: $RCSfile: vtkMarchingSquares.cxx,v $ Copyright (c) Ken Martin, Will Schroeder, Bill Lorensen All rights reserved. See Copyright.txt or http://www.kitware.com/Copyright.htm for details. THIS CLASS IS PATENTED UNDER UNITED STATES PATENT NUMBER 4,710,876 "System and Method for the Display of Surface Structures Contained Within the Interior Region of a Solid Body". Application of this software for commercial purposes requires a license grant from GE. Contact: but the patent number they reference which is linked above begins with A method and apparatus for displaying *three dimensional surface images* includes the utilization of a case table for rapid retrieval of surface approximation information. emphasis mine. So I don't know for sure what the patent status of the 2D algorithm is. JDH |
From: John H. <jdh...@ac...> - 2004-10-01 16:04:34
|
>>>>> "Helge" == Helge Avlesen <av...@ii...> writes: Helge> http://www.ii.uib.no/~avle/mpl/c1.png Helge> the first points of the segments are given by the vectors Helge> (x1,y1) the second (x2,y2). you can get pretty lines in Helge> matplotlib as well, but only by using the scattered line Helge> drawing methods of gtk. (something like Helge> self.area.window.draw_segments(self.gc, zip( x1,y1,x2,y2)?) OK, I see. I didn't fully understand that x1,x2,y1,y2 were the verts of unordered line segments. Then one can easily use a LineCollection to draw these efficiently in matplotlib - script below and screenshot http://nitace.bsd.uchicago.edu:8080/files/share/kontour.png. Jeez, I feel bad for sitting on this since February! Helge> if you want do do it "right" in matplotlib, you should Helge> implement a contour following algorithm (in C) - with this Helge> I mean an routine that returns the linesegments defining Helge> each countour in bundles. the current alg. is sort of Helge> marching cubes in 2D, a simplified version of CONREC Helge> http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~pbourke/projection/conrec/ Helge> but only using 2 triangles per square. Do you have any thoughts on how we might do labels with your code? Helge> doing contour following alg. it is also much easier to Helge> implement automatic contour labelling. I suspect python Helge> loops are too slow for such algorithms - it may perhaps be Helge> possible to do them in Numeric, but it will still be much Helge> slower than my simple library. I think you may use the Helge> GPL'ed PLPLOT (C) for an example of contour following alg. We have a problem in that we cannot use GPL'd code in matplotlib because the GPL does not allow redistribution of closed code, which the matplotlib (and python license) do. If we decide to go with your routines, at least for the time being until we can "do it right", would you be willing to contribute your code to matplotlib under the matplotlib license (PSF inspired, free for commercial and noncommercial reuse)? Thanks! JDH from matplotlib.matlab import * from matplotlib.collections import LineCollection import hutil delta = 0.05 x = y = arange(-3.0, 3.0, delta) X, Y = meshgrid(x, y) Z1 = bivariate_normal(X, Y, 1.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0) Z2 = bivariate_normal(X, Y, 1.5, 0.5, 1, 1) Z = Z2-Z1 print Z.shape fsm = ones(Z.shape, Z.typecode()) zmax, zmin = hutil.maxmin(Z) depths=linspace(zmin, zmax, 10) x1,y1,x2,y2 = hutil.contour2(Z, fsm, depths ) imshow(Z, origin='lower', interpolation='nearest') segments = [ ( (thisy1, thisx1), (thisy2, thisx2) ) for thisx1, thisy1, thisx2, thisy2 in zip( x1,y1,x2,y2)] coll = LineCollection(segments) gca().add_collection(coll) savefig('kontour') show() |
From: Helge A. <av...@ii...> - 2004-10-01 15:44:49
|
John Hunter <jdh...@ac...> writes: | I was concerned by the fact that the lines were not smooth - if you | plot a connected line they line jumps from side to side. But it | does get the contour right, and is implemented in pure numeric, and | so it occurs to me that it might be easier to fix this problem than | start from scratch. Perhaps Helge or one of you has some insight | into how to fix this. | | I'm attaching a modified version of the tarfile Helge initially sent | me. I've included a script testkont_mpl.py that calls Helge's lib. | Change the '.' linestyle to '-' to see the problem I discussed. Hi, not sure if I have matplotlib 100% correctly installed, but this is what I see using your example script: http://www.ii.uib.no/~avle/mpl/c0.png (and with the current algorithm, more or less what I would expect...) to get straight lines you must plot segments one by one since they are not ordered. if I use gist for this(see the script at the end) I get http://www.ii.uib.no/~avle/mpl/c1.png the first points of the segments are given by the vectors (x1,y1) the second (x2,y2). you can get pretty lines in matplotlib as well, but only by using the scattered line drawing methods of gtk. (something like self.area.window.draw_segments(self.gc, zip( x1,y1,x2,y2)?) if you want do do it "right" in matplotlib, you should implement a contour following algorithm (in C) - with this I mean an routine that returns the linesegments defining each countour in bundles. the current alg. is sort of marching cubes in 2D, a simplified version of CONREC http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~pbourke/projection/conrec/ but only using 2 triangles per square. doing contour following alg. it is also much easier to implement automatic contour labelling. I suspect python loops are too slow for such algorithms - it may perhaps be possible to do them in Numeric, but it will still be much slower than my simple library. I think you may use the GPL'ed PLPLOT (C) for an example of contour following alg. Helge from matplotlib.matlab import * import hutil delta = 0.05 x = y = arange(-3.0, 3.0, delta) X, Y = meshgrid(x, y) Z1 = bivariate_normal(X, Y, 1.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0) Z2 = bivariate_normal(X, Y, 1.5, 0.5, 1, 1) Z = Z2-Z1 print Z.shape #fsm = ones(Z.shape, Z.typecode()) fsm = ones(Z.shape, 'l') zmax, zmin = hutil.maxmin(Z) depths=linspace(zmin, zmax, 10) x1,y1,x2,y2 = hutil.contour2(Z, fsm, depths ) #imshow(Z, origin='lower', interpolation='nearest') #plot(y2,x2,'-') #show() import gist gist.pldefault(dpi=100,style='framed.gs') gist.palette('rainbow.gp') gist.pli(transpose(Z)) gist.pldj(x1,y1,x2,y2) # draw disjoint segments |
From: John H. <jdh...@ac...> - 2004-10-01 14:10:53
|
>>>>> "Fernando" == Fernando Perez <Fer...@co...> writes: Fernando> I think we're doing pretty good, except that people can Fernando> always kill themselves by running true WX/GTK apps via Fernando> @run. IPython is really not made for this, it can only Fernando> handle gracefully show() calls from pure matplotlib Fernando> scripts, not full-blown GUI apps. But I think we have a Fernando> very reasonable environment at this point for most usage Fernando> cases. It's looks like about 90% of your problems result from trying to cross GUI backends within IPython. Is this fair to say? As far as I'm concerned I don't have a problem with these cases. Caveat emptor -- the user should be forewarned and expect disaster if they try and run GUI specific examples from ipython. Perhaps you should say pylab only supports pure matlab interface matplotlib at this point. From your end I see why it's a concern - you don't want any run command to break or freeze ipython. If you have any ideas on what we should do I'll be happy to help on the matplotlib end, but I don't have any off the top of my head. I'll comment on some of the non cross-GUI problems below.... Fernando> // These don't run with LANG==de_DE.UTF-8, but are OK Fernando> with en_US.UTF-8 run date_demo_convert.py run Fernando> date_demo1.py run date_demo2.py run date_demo_rrule.py Fernando> run finance_demo.py Do they run from the shell with LANG==de_DE.UTF-8? Any idea what is going wrong? Fernando> run print_stdout.py This is an example script to show how to print png to stdout from agg. Perhaps this fails because ipython doesn't really expect a png coming in from stdout? The header of that file states # print png to standard out # usage: python print_stdout.py > somefile.png Fernando> ****run ftface_props.py ---> 71 font.jdh = 'hi' I was testing to see if I could setattr on my extension class. I'll just remove this line from the example Fernando> ****run movie_demo.py: with WX backend it doesn't make Fernando> the .png frames at all with WXAgg, it runs fine but Fernando> fails to make the movie: ... Saving frame _tmp049.png Fernando> Making movie animation.mpg - this make take a while sh: Fernando> line 1: mpeg2encode: command not found convert: Delegate Fernando> failed (mpeg2encode "%i" "%o"). convert: Delegate Fernando> failed (mpeg2encode "%i" "%o") [No such file or Fernando> directory]. Fernando> Symlinking mpeg2encode to mpeg2enc (the real binary) Fernando> doesn't help, a different error comes back. Fernando> I got it to work by commenting out the convert call and Fernando> reverting to the mencoder one. Great! Yes, this fails on my system too. This line works os.system("convert _tmp*.png animation.mpg") but I wasn't able to get convert to make mpg. I'll fixed this in the examples dir and made the mencoder line the default. Fernando> ****run vertical_ticklabels.py Fernando> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fernando> NameError Traceback (most recent call last) Fernando> /home/fperez/code/python/pylab/examples/vertical_ticklabels.py Fernando> 3 4 plot([1,2,3,4], [1,4,9,16]) 5 xticks([1,2,3,4], Fernando> ['Frogs', 'Hogs', 'Bogs', 'Slogs']) ----> 6 set(t, 'rotation', 'vertical') Fernando> 7 show() Fernando> NameError: name 't' is not defined WARNING: Failure Fernando> executing file: <vertical_ticklabels.py> Fixed. This also pointed me a bug in the new commands xticks and yticks; they weren't returning the things they claimed in the doc string. Thanks for the detailed notes. JDH |
From: Perry G. <pe...@st...> - 2004-10-01 03:32:48
|
> Hi again, > > Yes, I had the thought that using C for the algorithm would be easier as > well. There are actually some very well-written marching squares > contouring algorithms in C already out there. I will try to find such an > implementation and point you to it or send you the source code. > Thanks, that would be helpful. In my search I didn't come across many. Keep in mind the license needs to be compatible with that of matplotlib. > The second half is just the drawing, which should be implemented in > matplotlib using the line collections class. Since vector plotting is not Yeah, that's what we have in mind. > that hard, I will try to get that working first. Then, someone can take > my source code and adapt it easily to the contouring problem, once an > effective and sufficiently high-performance algorithm implementation can > be found. > > Cheers, > Curtis > OK, Perry |
From: Curtis C. <cu...@hi...> - 2004-10-01 03:29:35
|
> We are trying to adapt the C contour program that is used by gist > (and can be found in the contour routine used by xplt in scipy). > It would be best to look at the source for the precise description > of the algorithm it uses (note though that gist apparently uses > two different pieces of contour code for its contour tasks. The > one we are looking to adapt, mainly because it appears much easier > to isolate from the gist environment is the gcntr.c version). > I would be amazed if one could find a pure Python algorithm to do > contouring that was fast enough. Our current plan is to use these > C routines to generate the contour segments, and do the plotting > from within Python (as well as any contour labeling). > > If you have expertise in this area you may be able to do it better > and faster than we can. Currently it is being worked on part time > so we aren't able to do it as fast as we would like. I'm hoping that we > will have at least a basic version (e.g., no labeling) in a couple > weeks. > > If you want me to send or point you to the source code we are > using as the basis, let me know. Hi again, Yes, I had the thought that using C for the algorithm would be easier as well. There are actually some very well-written marching squares contouring algorithms in C already out there. I will try to find such an implementation and point you to it or send you the source code. The second half is just the drawing, which should be implemented in matplotlib using the line collections class. Since vector plotting is not that hard, I will try to get that working first. Then, someone can take my source code and adapt it easily to the contouring problem, once an effective and sufficiently high-performance algorithm implementation can be found. Cheers, Curtis |
From: Perry G. <pe...@st...> - 2004-10-01 02:17:03
|
Curtis Cooper writes: > My research is in computational fluid dynamics (specifically, the > meteorologies of planetary atmospheres). Working contour and vector plots > in matplotlib would make it possible for me to make 2D meteorological maps > of atmospheric layers, etc. > > I noticed for the first time in the goals page that contour plots are > being worked on, apparently by STSci. I have been considering > implementing these two plot types as sets of line collections, but now > that I know contour plots are being worked on, and vector plots are > simpler to implement (in 2D), I will work on making vector plots. The > mathematics is fairly straightforward. I just need to learn how to use > the class library. > > About contour plots, however, I have a couple of questions. How is it > being implemented? I was about to try to write a marching squares > contouring routine, although it might have been painfully slow in Python. > Does anyone have experience with this? > We are trying to adapt the C contour program that is used by gist (and can be found in the contour routine used by xplt in scipy). It would be best to look at the source for the precise description of the algorithm it uses (note though that gist apparently uses two different pieces of contour code for its contour tasks. The one we are looking to adapt, mainly because it appears much easier to isolate from the gist environment is the gcntr.c version). I would be amazed if one could find a pure Python algorithm to do contouring that was fast enough. Our current plan is to use these C routines to generate the contour segments, and do the plotting from within Python (as well as any contour labeling). If you have expertise in this area you may be able to do it better and faster than we can. Currently it is being worked on part time so we aren't able to do it as fast as we would like. I'm hoping that we will have at least a basic version (e.g., no labeling) in a couple weeks. If you want me to send or point you to the source code we are using as the basis, let me know. Perry Greenfield |