RE: [Dev-C++] Dev-C++ and VC++ 6.0

The opposite happens. Dev-C++'s MINGW compiler is more ANSI compliant
than VC++ (which is 4 years old). Send us the code so as to understand
what is wrong.


Ioannis

* Ioannis Vranos
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.f2s.com
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys


> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li...=20
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Wendel
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:57 PM
> To: dev...@li...
> Subject: [Dev-C++] Dev-C++ and VC++ 6.0
>=20
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> I have and use DEV-C++ with last snap-shot.
>=20
> But i tryed compile this program in .C that i recive and i=20
> recived this
> errors:
>=20
> When i tryed compile it here with Dev-c++ compiler it return=20
> me the errors:
>=20
> 17 c:\mf\release\reghide.c
> c:\mf\release\reghide.h:9: redefinition of `ULONG'
>=20
> 29 f:\dev-c_~1\include\winnt.h
>  `ULONG' previously declared here
>=20
> 10 c:\mf\release\reghide.h
>  redefinition of `USHORT'
>=20
> 28 f:\dev-c_~1\include\winnt.h
>  `USHORT' previously declared here
>=20
>=20
> But, who sent me ... spoken that it compile very well in=20
> Visual C++ 6.0!! Why ???
>=20
> VC++ 6.0 have some support best that Dev-C++ ?? Or is more complete ??
>=20
> thkz
>=20
> [ ]'s
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>=20