Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ChristianMan16 4

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

ChristianMan16 (4th Nomination)

ChristianMan16 (talk · contribs)

End date: 05:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC) I have found my self to mature a lot lately do more vandalism reverting as I can and some other stuff that I have not done before. I have found myself in a need for the tools more and more lately. I caught somebody creating multiple accounts a couple weeks ago yet I could do nothing cause no admin/'crat was on. I may not be as active as I used to be but that's cause I'm trying to get out of the house more and push my self....I think I could make a great Admin. The question is do you think the same? As for the stuff on the censorship for DYK nominations...you wouldn't deny me Adminship cause I stand up for what I believe in would you? Bottom line, I think I'm ready for Adminship.-- ✧ Christian Man 16 05:52, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: self nom -- ✧ Christian Man 16 05:52, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Oppose

Oppose - Only recently came back from break. Hardly any QDs. Thinks Wikipedia should be censored. Not good qualities for an admin. Kennedy ^(talk) 09:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose you were suspected of ban evading on enwiki just yesterday, in which you vandalised. A big cause for concern for a potential admin anywhere. PeterSymonds (talk) 09:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's called impersonation....That wasn't me...this happened to me before. I will get this looked in to again. Thank you for pointing me to it :D.-- ✧ Christian Man 16 18:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Sorry, not yet. As per PeterSymonds and Kennedy, and i've also found you slightly incivil imo. Sorry. B G^7even 09:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per above. I hardly see any QD tags the past few months, so that makes me think you won't be using the deletion tool very much for watching CAT:QDR if you were an administrator. I also consider you semi-active at the moment, since it seems you don't come in very often. I also see that you don't use edit summaries sometimes... use them all the time! I think you should wait until you improve more and until someone else (preferably someone trusted) nominates you. It seems you always do self-noms, which I have no problems with at all, but someone else nominating you helps since they think you should become an administrator. Though right now, I can't trust you with the tools. – RyanCross (talk) 11:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Incivility and ban evasion don't go down well in my book, regardless of wiki. I also think if you were sysopped, you'd somewhat use your tools to enforce censorship, which we don't have. ס ^Talk 11:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per all before me. Shapiros10 ^{Flap the Yap} 12:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very strongly oppose. Per everyone else, and the incredibly negative attitude. Majorly ^talk 13:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peter. I was in en when I heard of the report. If you're going to do such things, you will never redeem yourself, and never be an admin. Synergy 14:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Would anyone who hasn't participated care to close this as WP:SNOW? – RyanCross (talk) 18:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uhh...I usually don't defend Aaron, but he's been impersonated before on en. Here in the en incident archives shows that Steelerfan created two mock accounts to try to get him in trouble. I think there is reasonable doubt here. I dunno if the CUs will do it to clear any confusion up. alexandra (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I HATE to do this but with the new impersonations now in the light...I must withdraw this nomination.-- ✧ Christian Man 16 18:34, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.