Viewing abuse filter 5: Eliminare de note de subsol

Parametrii filtrului

ID filtru:	5
Descriere: (publică)
Potriviri filtru:	19.762 de potriviri
Statistici:	Din ultimele 2.594 de acțiuni, acest filtru a găsit 11 (0,42%). În medie, timpul său de rulare este de 0,34 ms, și consumă 2,1 condiții din limita de condiții
Condiții:	!("autoconfirmed" in user_groups) /* this edit_delta ignores large blankings that are treated by another filter / & edit_delta >= -3000 & article_namespace == 0 / No added lines usually mean a blanking which is dealt with by other filter / & length(added_lines) != 0 & !("#redirect" in lcase(added_lines)) /Counts of more reference tags are removed than added / & (rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\s+(name\|group)\|</ref>)",removed_lines) > rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\s+(name\|group)\|</ref>)",added_lines)) /Excludes changing to the named reference format and removing closing tags attached to formerly named refs. Unequality is to account for closing the first named tag / & !(rcount("<ref>",removed_lines) = rcount("<ref\s+(name\|group)",added_lines) \| rcount("</ref>",removed_lines) <= rcount("<ref\s+(name\|group)",added_lines)) /Excludes removal of references to Wikipedia itself / & !(count("http://ro.wikipedia.org",removed_lines) > count("http://ro.wikipedia.org",added_lines)) !("autoconfirmed" in user_groups) / this edit_delta ignores large blankings that are treated by another filter / & edit_delta >= -3000 & article_namespace == 0 / No added lines usually mean a blanking which is dealt with by other filter / & length(added_lines) != 0 & !("#redirect" in lcase(added_lines)) /Counts of more reference tags are removed than added / & (rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\s+(name\|group)\|</ref>)",removed_lines) > rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\s+(name\|group)\|</ref>)",added_lines)) /Excludes changing to the named reference format and removing closing tags attached to formerly named refs. Unequality is to account for closing the first named tag / & !(rcount("<ref>",removed_lines) = rcount("<ref\s+(name\|group)",added_lines) \| rcount("</ref>",removed_lines) <= rcount("<ref\s+(name\|group)",added_lines)) /Excludes removal of references to Wikipedia itself */ & !(count("http://ro.wikipedia.org",removed_lines) > count("http://ro.wikipedia.org",added_lines))
Note:	"<ref\|</ref" split for clarity Appears to get more and better hits on referenced info now too. Apparently, previous version wasn't working properly. --Mgm Switched on. - It Is Me Here Tagging instead of disallowing, there are plenty of good reasons to remove references. -- Mgm Oh, is this for all references? Wasn't there one regarding removing a {{Reflist}} template? - It Is Me Here That one (filter 79) was a test, and it doesn't appear to be working properly. It hasn't caught anything for at least 24 hours. - Mgm removed private flag, unnecessary -- Zzuuzz Updated format that should also catch named references and avoid the old reference grouping tag. --Mgm Filter 79 now working properly, removing line that specifies reflist. Working on better regex to avoid <references/> being hit with this one --Mgm Changing to edit_delta <= -1000 from >= -1000; seems like this was the intent. >= and <= comparisons are based on actual value, not absolute value. Correct me if this was the intent. Also, we are getting some false positives on this, see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interstate_5_in_Washington&diff=279452062&oldid=278504317 - Hersfold >= is correct. It is supposed to exclude large removals from being evaluated since they're covered by blanking filters. It was an error in the regex. Instead of allowing for <ref name="whatever">, the regex allowed choosing between <ref> and <ref name>, the last of which obviously didn't work. -- Mgm added note in filter to avoid confusion --Mgm Altered regex to treat refs as whole blocks, to avoid situation where a duplicate ref is changed to a named ref (<ref>Blah</ref> --> <ref name=foo/>). Now won't catch users removing one end of a ref though. Might have ec'd with cmt above, but can't tell in this wierd system :D --HM Okay... I THINK this is finally a correct regex that: 1) grabs <ref> ... </ref> as entire blocks 2) grabs <ref name="foo"/> 3) ignores <references/> 4) allows newline breaks between <ref> and </ref> tags. 5) grabs only consecutive <ref>, </ref> pairs (as opposed to jumping from the first <ref> to the last </ref>). -DF Restored original version, added exclusions for naming references and removing closing tags of named references. --Mgm Added comments for clarity --Mgm Too many false positives, setting to log only. --Conti From Coppertwig: A more exact count might be obtained by defining a ref-opening as either "<ref>" or "<ref name" and a ref-closing as either "</ref>" or "ref name ... />". (With the named reference, the same tag will sometimes count as both an opening and a closing.) The code might look something like this (assuming rcount expects regular expressions): /* count of removed ref-openings exceeds count of added ref-openings, or count of removed ref-closings exceeds count of added ref-closings; named refs with slashes count as both openings and closings. / & (rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\sname)",removed_lines) > rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\sname)",added_lines) \| rcount("(</ref>\|<ref\sname[^>/]/>)",removed_lines) > rcount("(</ref>\|<ref\sname[^>/]*/>)",added_lines) Adjusted delta to -3000 due to a sock removing references that has been missed due to the total removed content. Ref [[User:Ryulong/Sandbox#Ref_removing_vandal]] - Shirik 24 Jan I replaced \sname with \s(name\|group). - Ruslik Something 'wrong' here .. it catches also '<ref></ref>' (i.e., empty tags, as included in the article creation wizard). They should be excluded.
Steaguri:	Warning: This filter was automatically flagged as harmful. No actions were automatically disabled, but please check whether the high rate of matches is expected. If so, you can ignore this warning. Ascunde publicului detaliile acestui filtru Activează acest filtru Enable the use of [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Extension:AbuseFilter/Rules_format#Protected_variables protected variables] in this filter Marchează ca șters
Ultima modificare filtru:	10 ianuarie 2020 02:47 de Ionutzmovie (discuție \| contribuții)
Istoric:	Vezi istoricul filtrului
Unelte:	Exportă acest filtru către un alt wiki {"data":{"rules":"!(\"autoconfirmed\" in user_groups)\r\n/* this edit_delta ignores large blankings that are treated by another filter /\r\n\u0026 edit_delta \u003E= -3000\r\n\u0026 article_namespace == 0\r\n/ No added lines usually mean a blanking which is dealt with by other filter /\r\n\u0026 length(added_lines) != 0\r\n\u0026 !(\"#redirect\" in lcase(added_lines))\r\n/Counts of more reference tags are removed than added /\r\n\u0026 (rcount(\"(\u003Cref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\s+(name\|group)\|\u003C/ref\u003E)\",removed_lines) \u003E rcount(\"(\u003Cref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\s+(name\|group)\|\u003C/ref\u003E)\",added_lines))\r\n/Excludes changing to the named reference format and removing closing tags attached to formerly named refs. Unequality is to account for closing the first named tag /\r\n\u0026 !(rcount(\"\u003Cref\u003E\",removed_lines) = rcount(\"\u003Cref\\s+(name\|group)\",added_lines) \| rcount(\"\u003C/ref\u003E\",removed_lines) \u003C= rcount(\"\u003Cref\\s+(name\|group)\",added_lines))\r\n/Excludes removal of references to Wikipedia itself /\r\n\u0026 !(count(\"http://ro.wikipedia.org\",removed_lines) \u003E count(\"http://ro.wikipedia.org\",added_lines))","name":"Eliminare de note de subsol","comments":"\"\u003Cref\|\u003C/ref\" split for clarity\r\n\r\nAppears to get more and better hits on referenced info now too. Apparently, previous version wasn't working properly. --Mgm\r\n\r\nSwitched on. - It Is Me Here\r\nTagging instead of disallowing, there are plenty of good reasons to remove references. -- Mgm\r\nOh, is this for all references? Wasn't there one regarding removing a {{Reflist}} template? - It Is Me Here\r\n That one (filter 79) was a test, and it doesn't appear to be working properly. It hasn't caught anything for at least 24 hours. - Mgm\r\nremoved private flag, unnecessary -- Zzuuzz\r\nUpdated format that should also catch named references and avoid the old reference grouping tag. --Mgm\r\nFilter 79 now working properly, removing line that specifies reflist. Working on better regex to avoid \u003Creferences/\u003E being hit with this one --Mgm\r\n\r\nChanging to edit_delta \u003C= -1000 from \u003E= -1000; seems like this was the intent. \u003E= and \u003C= comparisons are based on actual value, not absolute value. Correct me if this was the intent. Also, we are getting some false positives on this, see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interstate_5_in_Washington\u0026diff=279452062\u0026oldid=278504317 - Hersfold\r\n\r\n\u003E= is correct. It is supposed to exclude large removals from being evaluated since they're covered by blanking filters. It was an error in the regex. Instead of allowing for \u003Cref name=\"whatever\"\u003E, the regex allowed choosing between \u003Cref\u003E and \u003Cref name\u003E, the last of which obviously didn't work. -- Mgm\r\n\r\nadded note in filter to avoid confusion --Mgm\r\n\r\nAltered regex to treat refs as whole blocks, to avoid situation where a duplicate ref is changed to a named ref (\u003Cref\u003EBlah\u003C/ref\u003E --\u003E \u003Cref name=foo/\u003E). Now won't catch users removing one end of a ref though. Might have ec'd with cmt above, but can't tell in this wierd system :D --HM\r\n\r\n\r\nOkay... I THINK this is finally a correct regex that:\r\n\r\n 1) grabs \u003Cref\u003E ... \u003C/ref\u003E as entire blocks\r\n 2) grabs \u003Cref name=\"foo\"/\u003E\r\n 3) ignores \u003Creferences/\u003E\r\n 4) allows newline breaks between \u003Cref\u003E and \u003C/ref\u003E tags.\r\n 5) grabs only consecutive \u003Cref\u003E, \u003C/ref\u003E pairs (as opposed to jumping from the first \u003Cref\u003E to the last \u003C/ref\u003E).\r\n\r\n-DF\r\n\r\nRestored original version, added exclusions for naming references and removing closing tags of named references. --Mgm\r\n\r\nAdded comments for clarity --Mgm\r\n\r\nToo many false positives, setting to log only. --Conti\r\n\r\nFrom Coppertwig:\r\nA more exact count might be obtained by defining a ref-opening as either \"\u003Cref\u003E\" or \"\u003Cref name\" and a ref-closing as either \"\u003C/ref\u003E\" or \"ref name ... /\u003E\". (With the named reference, the same tag will sometimes count as both an opening and a closing.) The code might look something like this (assuming rcount expects regular expressions):\r\n\r\n/ count of removed ref-openings exceeds count of added ref-openings, or count of removed ref-closings exceeds count of added ref-closings; named refs with slashes count as both openings and closings. / \u0026 (rcount(\"(\u003Cref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\sname)\",removed_lines) \u003E rcount(\"(\u003Cref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\sname)\",added_lines) \| rcount(\"(\u003C/ref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\sname[^\u003E/]/\u003E)\",removed_lines) \u003E rcount(\"(\u003C/ref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\sname[^\u003E/]*/\u003E)\",added_lines)\r\n\r\nAdjusted delta to -3000 due to a sock removing references that has been missed due to the total removed content. Ref [[User:Ryulong/Sandbox#Ref_removing_vandal]] - Shirik 24 Jan\r\n\r\nI replaced \\sname with \\s(name\|group). - Ruslik\r\n\r\nSomething 'wrong' here .. it catches also '\u003Cref\u003E\u003C/ref\u003E' (i.e., empty tags, as included in the article creation wizard). They should be excluded.","group":"default","actions":{"disallow":["abusefilter-disallowed"],"tag":["Eliminare de note de subsol."],"warn":["abusefilter-warning-removereferences"]},"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"privacylevel":0,"global":false},"actions":{"disallow":["abusefilter-disallowed"],"tag":["Eliminare de note de subsol."],"warn":["abusefilter-warning-removereferences"]}}

Acțiuni efectuate la detectare

Declanșează acțiunile doar dacă utilizatorul a depășit limita impusă

Număr de acțiuni permise:

Perioadă de timp (în secunde):

Grupează limitările de viteză după:

(una pe linie, despărțite prin virgule)

user

Vezi documentația de la mediawiki.org.

Declanșează aceste acțiuni după ce ai avertizat utilizatorul

Mesaj de sistem de utilizat pentru avertizare:

Numele paginii unui alt mesaj:

(fără prefix „MediaWiki:”)

Nu permite utilizatorului efectuarea acestei acțiuni

Mesaj de sistem care trebuie utilizat pentru a nu permite:

Numele paginii unui alt mesaj: :(fără prefixul "MediaWiki:")

Revocă statutul autoconfirmat al utilizatorului

Marchează modificarea pentru revizuire ulterioară

Marcaje de aplicat:

Eliminare de note de subsol.

Require the user to complete a CAPTCHA in order to proceed with the action. Users with permission to skip a CAPTCHA are exempt.