• 1 Post
  • 7.4K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • I don’t like the thought that the EU is limited by semantics. They started out as an alliance of European nations, but why should they be limited to that just because of their name? (Also, I’d argue Canada and the US are European by culture, but not by geography.)

    If you can make an actual argument about it being useful or not then do that. The US proximity thing is the start of an argument, though I’d argue it isn’t a smart, forward-thinking reason. If the US expands (or another antagonistic nation), should membership be rejected or removed to satisfy them? That’s how WWII started.


  • The comparison being made is them growing up with these parents, and suffering the consequences of it, or them dying at birth and not suffering. I don’t think those are comparable (as in, you literally can’t weight them against each other). They have totally different ways you’d evaluate their value.

    Them dying at birth has almost zero cost or consequence. How do you measure against nothing? Them surviving has many costs and benefits. You can weight them against each other to argue if it’s good or bad, but you can’t compare it against oblivion. It’s like temperature. You can say it’s hot or it’s cold subjectively, but you can’t compare it against a vacuum that literally doesn’t have temperature.



  • Cethin@lemmy.ziptoSolarpunk@slrpnk.netThe Diggers were Based
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It’s both heartening and disheartening. It’s good to see the people of the time didn’t accept the bullshit either, but it also hurts to see we’ve been fighting the same fight for hundreds (probably more like thousands, or tens of thousands) of years, and we’re not much closer to winning.





  • If by “direct traffic” you mean to send them there, then I’d say we don’t need that, and shouldn’t want it. The whole reason federation works is because control is spread out. Giving one, or a few, instances control of most of the content and users is a horrible idea and begging for issues. Speaking of, if you’re on lemmy.world, you should consider spreading elsewhere. At least don’t send new people there.



  • I know exactly how time travail would work; forward only. Backwards time travel isn’t happening. In the imaginary world where it does work though I don’t see how radio waves wouldn’t work. I don’t know what heliocentric math has to do with it. You can tell where they’re coming from no matter where you are in the universe, not just around the sun. Then you adjust to that position and you’re done.



  • To say it’s the same for people who are fully grown and have a life behind them are the same as a newborn baby is a bit simplistic at best. They aren’t even capable of understanding what it is to be alive, and there’s been almost nothing spent on them yet.

    We could still look into people suffering chronically out of interest, but I wouldn’t say anything that comes from it can be compared to this. A baby has no concept of relationships, morals, religion, or anything else that ties them to the world. If they’re gone, the world continues on just like the day before (obviously except for the parents potentially, but they’re the ones that caused this).




  • Despite what everyone says, it’s probably not going to be cheaper than building your own system, especially since building your own you can skip stuff you don’t need and prioritize parts you really want. This just has whatever it has. You don’t get to pick and choose. At best, it’s going to be about the same price as if you purchased the hardware yourself.

    It will be less effort though, so there’s that.

    I think price estimates are somewhere sub $600. That’s all just speculation though.



  • That’s not really true. First, if you can invent time travel you can probably do the math to calculate positions of objects. Second, even if you do need a beacon, you could use something that already exists. For example, radio waves. Earth has been shooting off radio waves for a fair amount of time now. That could be used as a beacon. Also, you could do something like having your time machine do small jumps, check it’s relative position, then adjust. This would solve just about every issue.


  • Cethin@lemmy.ziptoMemes@lemmygrad.mlSolarpunk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    You only asked me how to convince other Anarchists to accept that some form of leadership isn’t authoritarianism. Also, I didn’t even mention voting or term limits. I mentioned leadership, where it’s needed, needs to cycle. This doesn’t even imply voting. Stop making shit up and saying I didn’t answer it. There are a lot of solutions out there. If you care, you can look into it. I’m not spending hours listing all possible solutions to vague questions that aren’t asked in good faith.

    You sound like one of those people who go “communism can’t work because…” and then give some stupid reason it can’t work. It’s not worth discussing because they aren’t actually arguing in good faith the answers exist, and they’re only against something because they’re idiologically against it, not because they actually understand it.


  • I don’t want to be an asshole, but no one can make a definitive statement like this (accurately). It’s incredibly subjective. Many years of pain and suffering, as well as increased resource drain, or nothingness. You can’t really compare those. You can’t really make any claim about non-existence.

    If your argument is that more people is always better, I’d say that’s nieve and dangerous, but I guess it is a belief you could hold. In that case I’d say there will be plenty more children born. It’s not a concern. We’ve reduced deaths of infants/babies/fetuses pretty substantially.