• SinTan1729
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    To each their own, but I really don’t see the point of these distros. I usually just install Debian or AlmaLinux on my homeservers and build on top of it. I guess extra tooling can be helpful, but I’ve never felt the need for it.

    • stewie410
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’ve somewhat recently taken TrueNAS to avoid the headache of DKMS for ZFS support.

      While it is nice to know I basically don’t have to worry about that, the rest of it is pretty painful – I can’t even install a package without manually running it in docker.

      We’ve in a CentOS/Rocky shop at work until recently, moving to Debian.

      If I has to redo my NAS, is take Debian or something and call it a day. The hassle of TrueNAS and similar distros do not really seem worth it, if you want more control.

      • SinTan1729
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, ZFS support can be a bit annoying to deal with. I use kmod packages, but have faced small issues in the past. It’s usually pretty easy to resolve them, tho. Just stay on an older kernel for a few days.