Re: Lisp as a procedural language?

<div dir="ltr">From what I remember with tinkering with Lisp a while back, SBCL and CMUCL are the big free
implementations. I remember something about GCL being non-standard.  Either of those should make lisp hackers happy.<br
/><br/><div class="gmail_quote">2008/10/18 M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <span dir="ltr"><<a
href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>></span><br/><blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Someone at the
PostgreSQLWest conference last weekend expressed an<br /> interest in a Lisp procedural language. The only two Lisp
environments<br/> I've found so far that aren't GPL are Steel Bank Common Lisp (MIT,<br /><a
href="http://sbcl.sourceforge.net"target="_blank">http://sbcl.sourceforge.net</a>) and XLispStat (BSD,<br /><a
href="http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/%7Eluke/xls/xlsinfo/xlsinfo.html"
target="_blank">http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~luke/xls/xlsinfo/xlsinfo.html</a>).SBCL is a<br /> very active project, but
I'mnot sure about XLispStat.<br /> --<br /> M. Edward (Ed) Borasky<br /><a href="http://ruby-perspectives.blogspot.com"
target="_blank">ruby-perspectives.blogspot.com</a><br/><br /> "A mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into
theorems."--<br /> Alfréd Rényi via Paul Erdős<br /><font color="#888888"><br /><br /><br /> --<br /> Sent via
pgsql-hackersmailing list (<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>)<br /> To
makechanges to your subscription:<br /><a href="http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers"
target="_blank">http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers</a><br/></font></blockquote></div><br /></div>