Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
| От | Merlin Moncure |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | [email protected] обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf (Tom Lane <[email protected]>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrew Chernow <[email protected]> writes: >> Maybe the argument to PQinitSSLExtended should be a bit mask, making >> this version more extendable ... PG_INITSSL, PG_INITCRYPTO? > > +1 for thinking ahead to the next time, but is a bit mask the right thing? What would you suggest? struct pointer? varargs? If you are down with the struct pointer idea, maybe we could revive the idea of PQinit: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg01349.php We could fix up the windows issue at the same time, and leave room for other things. Fixing windows WSA issues or installing an event proc hook into the library :D. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: