Re: Bug in documentation: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/spi-examples.html
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug in documentation: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/spi-examples.html |
Дата | |
Msg-id | [email protected] обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug in documentation: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/spi-examples.html ("David G. Johnston" <[email protected]>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug in documentation: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/spi-examples.html
Re: Bug in documentation: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/spi-examples.html |
Список | pgsql-docs |
"David G. Johnston" <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:53 PM Curt Kolovson <[email protected]> wrote: >> The actual results (shown below) are different than shown on this doc >> page. > SPI_exec sees "INSERT 0 2" as the command tag from the SQL command you > passed and so 2 is the output of the execq function call. > No INFO messages appear because you did not include a returning clause. > The 1 you passed to the call is immaterial if the query you supply doesn't > produce a result set. I think his point is that this example does not behave as the documentation claims. Which it does not, according to my tests here. I find this a bit disturbing --- did we intentionally change the behavior of SPI_exec somewhere along the line? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: