Re: the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas
От | terry |
---|---|
Тема | Re: the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | [email protected] обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas ("Iavor Raytchev" <[email protected]>) |
Ответы |
Re: the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
>> > >> Hm... In MS Access it is called 'Relations' which sounds kind >> > >> of correct. >> > >> > Actually, the window is called "Relationships", not >> > "Relations".... >> >> Correct. Was lazy to look it up. Does this change something? Not really, I was just following up on the discussion about the incorrect use of the term Relations by MS Access. I don't think that Relationships is a bad tab label - except that it's a bit long for the current size tabs :). Access's Relationships are all placed on one canvas, regardless of whether or not there are several independent diagrams present. If this model is to be used by pgaccess, it would make just as much sense to put 'Relationships' into the Database menu instead of a tab, since the New, Open, and Design actions would not mean anything. the-$0.02-of-an-old-Access-developer-wishing-the-best-to-pgaccess ... terry
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: