bufmgr: Fix undefined behaviour with, unrealistically, large temp_buffers
Quoting Melanie:
> Since if buffer is INT_MAX, then the -(buffer + 1) version invokes
> undefined behavior while the -buffer - 1 version doesn't.
All other places were already using the correct version. I (Andres), copied
the code into more places in a patch. Melanie caught it in review, but to
prevent more people from copying the bad code, fix it. Even if it is a
theoretical issue.
We really ought to wrap these accesses in a helper function...
As this is a theoretical issue, don't backpatch.
Reported-by: Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_aW2SX_LWtwHgfnqYpBrunMLfE9PD6-ioPpkh92XH0qpg@mail.gmail.com
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/558cf803876874c55d637a1e87417fa1c670efe1
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/storage/buffer/localbuf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
