Fix misleading PG_RE_THROW commentary The old verbiage indicated that PG_RE_THROW is optional, which is not really true. This has confused many people, so it seems worth fixing. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected] Branch ------ master Details ------- https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c603b392c32513982439bc466312d3a6b697d53e Modified Files -------------- src/include/utils/elog.h | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
pgsql-committers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
