Teach CLUSTER to use seqscan-and-sort when it's faster than indexscan. ... or at least, when the planner's cost estimates say it will be faster. Leonardo Francalanci, reviewed by Itagaki Takahiro and Tom Lane Branch ------ master Details ------- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=3ba11d3df2115b04171a8eda8e0389e02578d8d0 Modified Files -------------- doc/src/sgml/ref/cluster.sgml | 67 +++---- src/backend/commands/cluster.c | 161 ++++++++++++---- src/backend/optimizer/path/costsize.c | 45 +++-- src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c | 3 + src/backend/optimizer/plan/planmain.c | 3 +- src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c | 123 ++++++++++++- src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepunion.c | 3 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c | 2 + src/backend/optimizer/util/plancat.c | 86 +++++++-- src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c | 310 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/include/optimizer/cost.h | 1 + src/include/optimizer/plancat.h | 2 + src/include/optimizer/planner.h | 2 + src/include/utils/tuplesort.h | 43 +++-- 14 files changed, 713 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
pgsql-committers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных