I assumed this was only going to be for 1.14 and not backpatched, since you said previously that you expected no more than the one we discussed before... So if this is the pattern, I switch over to objecting in principle to backpatching what's essentially new features (support for a new version of the backend). Obviously no objections to the commit to head. //Magnus On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 05:55, Dave Page <[email protected]> wrote: > Fix PPAS package support for 9.0 > > Branch > ------ > REL-1_12_0_PATCHES > > Details > ------- > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=2934ca66b2dbafb80534460448c82b776e50cc3a > Author: Nikhil S <[email protected]> > > Modified Files > -------------- > CHANGELOG | 1 + > pgadmin/schema/edbPackage.cpp | 10 ++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > -- > Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers > -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
pgadmin-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных