Re: Seamless replacement to MySQL's GROUP_CONCAT function... - Mailing list pgsql-general

From [email protected]
Subject Re: Seamless replacement to MySQL's GROUP_CONCAT function...
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Seamless replacement to MySQL's GROUP_CONCAT function...  (Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-general
Ahh! I was looking for that in the documentation!! I believe that is not mentioned on the function documentation page.
Ihad tried ANY that works for other SQLs, but it had barfed on it. Let me test it and post the more efficient code, if
itworks... 

========================
On 08/05/2013 01:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> [email protected] escribió:
>
>>     Note: I found some close-but-no cigar aggregates shared online, but
>>     they would not accept integer arguments, nor would they handle the
>>     optionally furnished delimiter. People would suggesting casting the
>>     argument to the pseudo-GROUP_CONCAT. Again: Rewrite perhaps hundreds
>>     of queries?<br>
> I don't think you need all the variations; you should be able to make
> them all work with a single set of functions, taking ANYELEMENT instead
> of text/int8/int4 etc.
>
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Stephen Brearley"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Postgres 9.2.4 for Windows (Vista) Dell Vostro 400, re-installation failure PLEASE CAN SOMEONE HELP!! (nearly fixed)
Next
From: "[email protected]"
Date:
Subject: Re: Seamless replacement to MySQL's GROUP_CONCAT function...