Re: more RLS oversights - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: more RLS oversights
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: more RLS oversights  (Robert Haas <[email protected]>)
Responses Re: more RLS oversights
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Joe Conway <[email protected]> wrote:

> > The equivalent message for functions is:
> >   ".. are not allowed in functions in FROM"
> >
> > So how does this sound:
> > "... are not allowed in policies in USING and WITH CHECK expressions"
> > or perhaps more simply:
> > "... are not allowed in policies in USING and WITH CHECK"
> 
> Awkward.  The "in policies in" phrasing is just hard to read.

Yeah.  Besides, it's not really the same thing.

> Why not just "in policy expressions"?  There's no third kind that does
> allow these.

WFM

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: more RLS oversights
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest