-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:36:56 -0800
Jeff Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If there is any significant I/O latency for a single backend, it seems
> like a context switch could be a win for processor utilization. It
> might not be a win overall, but at least potentially a win.
Do we want a 20% potential win or an 80% potential win?
I would personally rather keep it simple, hard core, and data shoving
as possible without any issue with scheduling etc..
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHwx+EATb/zqfZUUQRAvOgAJ4vWCO74XzXy9Pbzqz3otWoqKI3HgCfRwUI
ZLd0SOgf5jnInZvOxCS+iNU=
=Syk1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
