On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:45:22 -0400, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:29:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Wouldn't it be better to just stay in TBLOCK_STARTED state, as if the
> >> COMMIT were just some random utility command?
>
> > It's the same thing, because CommitTransactionCommand acts identically
> > either way. I changed it anyway because it seems simpler.
>
> Patch applied.
Many thanks for this. I appreciate it's a fairly trivial issue, but
seeing the word "ROLLBACK" when a commit, or at least a non-operation
were expected, can do nasty things to one's blood pressure.
Ian Barwick
[email protected]
