Re: [HACKERS] index-only count(*) for indexes supporting bitmap scans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Kuzmenkov
Subject Re: [HACKERS] index-only count(*) for indexes supporting bitmap scans
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] index-only count(*) for indexes supporting bitmap scans  (Tom Lane <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I've pushed the executor part of this, but mostly not the planner part,
> because I didn't think the latter was anywhere near ready for prime
> time: the regression test changes it was causing were entirely bogus.
>
Hi Tom,

Thanks for the commit and the explanation. I'll try to address your 
comments if I continue working on the planner part.

-- 

Alexander Kuzmenkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] ginInsertCleanup called from vacuum could still miss tuples to be deleted
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping