From: Jim Nasby Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 10:19 AM
>>On 4/1/16 2:54 AM, jarek wrote:
>> I'll be happy to hear form users of big PostgreSQL installations, how
>> many users do you have and what kind of problems we may expect.
>> Is there any risk, that huge number of roles will slowdown overall
>> performance ?
>Assuming you're on decent sized hardware though, 3000-4000 open connections shouldn't be much of an >issue *as long as
veryfew are active at once*. If you get into a situation where there's a surge of activity >and you suddenly have 2x
moreactive connections than cores, you won't be happy. I've seen that push >servers into a state where the only way to
recoverwas to disconnect everyone.
>--
>Jim Nasby
Jim - I don't quite understand the math here: on a server with 20 cores, it can only support 40 active users?
I come from the SQL Server world where a single 20 core server could support hundreds/thousands of active users and/or
manydozens of background/foreground data processes. Is there something fundamentally different between the two
platformsrelative to active user loads? How would we be able to use Postgres for larger web apps?
Mike Sofen
