> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Tom Lane
>
> "Mikheev, Vadim" <[email protected]> writes:
> >> Do you not like the proposal I was suggesting? I thought it
> >> was pretty much what you said yourself a few months ago...
>
> > Do not add TID to key but store key anywhere in duplicate chain and
> > just read lefter child page while positioning index scan, as we do
> > right now for partial keys?
>
> > This will result in additional reads but I like it much more than
> > current "logic"...
>
What about unique key insertions ?
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
