User Details
- User Since
- Oct 13 2014, 9:51 PM (515 w, 3 d)
- Availability
- Available
- LDAP User
- Unknown
- MediaWiki User
- Trijnstel [ Global Accounts ]
May 8 2020
Feb 14 2020
This is likely a duplicate of T167219.
Sep 15 2019
May 6 2019
Apr 13 2019
Apr 7 2019
I agree with @MarcoAurelio, @DerHexer and @revi.
Feb 25 2019
Jan 9 2019
Dec 2 2018
Nov 5 2018
I've activated 2FA on phabricator and I already find that annoying. Let alone when I need to use that for user right changes (T197150) and, even worse, for checkuser actions.
I've activated 2FA on phabricator and I already find that annoying. Let alone when I need to use that for user right changes and, even worse, for checkuser actions (T197158).
Oct 26 2018
Oct 21 2018
Oct 7 2018
PS. For me this is visible: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Ujbpgpbtbszkwgt8
See the two relevant suppressions on 10 September 2018: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Log/suppress/Trijnstel
Aug 12 2018
It's been six days since the rename now, and nothing has happened. Could someone please look at it asap? Tnx. @Tgr @Legoktm @Keegan @Jalexander
Jul 14 2018
Jul 13 2018
Seven years since this bug was first filed, for a loss of CU logs in 2006, and still nothing has been done.
@hoo Can you help with this bug as well?
Jul 12 2018
Jun 3 2018
May 30 2018
Suggestion from someone else to add a confirm option, so no one would accidentally click on the vanish button.
Jan 23 2018
Jan 15 2018
Jan 12 2018
Btw, messages to the list admins are received by me, so I see no reason to change my email address. I’ll look at changing the bounce settings this evening, but that obviously doesn’t solve this problem.
Jan 11 2018
Jan 9 2018
Jan 6 2018
Jan 4 2018
Dec 23 2017
Dec 17 2017
Dec 12 2017
Dec 11 2017
Did someone find the time to fix this? Platonides maybe? Up til now nothing happened... and I'd say it's pretty urgent.
Dec 2 2017
Aug 12 2017
May 22 2017
Feb 28 2017
Dec 23 2016
Useful suggestion. Thanks.
Would definitely useful, yes. Thanks.
Dec 13 2016
Nov 20 2016
I've checked a few random tickets in permissions-commons and can confirm that it's resolved. Closing this bug report now.
Nov 17 2016
Nov 12 2016
Definitely. It would be nice if this could be fixed soon. Thanks.
Jul 5 2016
I've updated this page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Www.wikipedia.org_template&diff=15744971&oldid=15729043 - its documentation says "The generated code draws from the following unprotected pages". One of them is https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Module:Project_portal/wikis. But why doesn't it update this then? https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Module:Project_portal/wikis&diff=15744965&oldid=15742229
Jul 2 2016
HELLO? Is anyone working on this? It's pretty annoying that no one seems to care to quickly fix this... I apologize if I'm mistaken, but it certainly looks this way.
Jun 26 2016
@hoo, @tstarling, @Reedy: And it's a year later... Any update here?
Jun 23 2016
Some layout changes on small and private wikis? Because another user also reports it about nl.wikisource, see (in Dutch) https://nl.wikisource.org/wiki/Hoofdpagina and https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:De_kroeg#Graag_hulp_op_wikisource
Apr 24 2016
Mar 6 2016
Good suggestion... But: there are 700-800 projects. If the WMF would register this domain, then they probably should do the same for dewikipedia.org, frwikipedia.org etc. I'm not sure we could ask that from them...
Feb 20 2016
Jan 24 2016
Jan 2 2016
Dec 21 2015
Any update on this one?
"and also to get rid of one or two annoying special cases in the code for that particular log" - what do you mean? The fact we have a suppression log is good, imho. I mean, where else should you put suppression actions without having others access to it? Is this only about a suppression where one deletes+suppress a page at the same time?
See for a related bug report T40297
Any update on this one? What is needed here?
Dec 18 2015
I don't see the need for this proposed change. It can only confuse people and there is no reason why non-oversighters should see that an oversighter did something. I propose to decline this request.
@csteipp: Any idea when this patch will go live? And could you please 'warn' us on time by sending an email to stewards-l via your wikimedia email address? Thanks! :)
With T95857 being fixed recently, I think that this bug (limiting from a /19 block to a /48) should not be done.
Nov 3 2015
Aug 8 2015
I have now. 😅 But it looks like it's not working yet.... Nothing in the suppression log entry on that diff (and for that diff) yet...
Jul 29 2015
As an addition, I see I can mark the first page here: https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amargosawoestijn&oldid=44538491&diff=prev ("[Als gecontroleerd markeren]" is mentioned next to "Nieuwere bewerking" and below), but I don't see such a link here: https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amargosawoestijn&redirect=no (see printscreens)
More examples: