In T143349#2946796, @chasemp wrote:

@Qgil and @Acs do you know if the instance (admins here https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Nova_Resource:Contributors):

Contributors-metrics.contributors.eqiad.wmflabs

Can be removed or is planned for upgrade to Trusty or Jessie?

In T114437#2821343, @Aklapper wrote:

@Anmolkalia: I am resetting the assignee of this task because there have not been signs of progress lately (please correct me if I'm wrong).
Resetting the assignee avoids the impression that somebody is already working on fixing this task and it also allows anybody else to potentially work towards fixing this task. Thanks for your understanding! :)

In T72600#1567113, @Aklapper wrote:

@Dicortazar: Any news here when it comes to fixing the underlying problem?

Fixed the name of the metric and the number of pending changesets per affiliation. No more negative numbers (we were showing the net changesets pending, not the total changesets pending used to compute the age).

In T72278#1382212, @Dicortazar wrote:

@Acs, is it already in production? Can we close this ticket?

After reviewing the code I have seem that we have already implemented this filter but using the Volume of open changesets" not filtered by verified -1 and verified -2 approach.

In T72278#1378889, @Qgil wrote:

In T72278#1378848, @Acs wrote:

Quim, taking a look to current korma KPI:

http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/gerrit_review_queue.html

the first graph title is: "Backlog of open changesets (monthly snapshots)". I think this is not correct. In this graph we have the time evolution of open changesets. Is there any reason for this title?

This is the title and the concept we agreed when we were polishing this page. At the end of every month, we capture the total amount of open changesets, and from those, how many are waiting for review. We called them "monthly snapshots" to make sure that the numbers of every past month would stay unchanged.

Quim, taking a look to current korma KPI:

The instance is up now since yesterday. Any clues about the problem?

In T72278#1166368, @Dicortazar wrote:

After checking the code, I'd say that the case of Verified = -1 and Verified = -2 has not been implemented at least in the metrics depicted in the first four charts of that page.

I may have missed something, so probably @Acs can confirm this part.

I've checked code under the mediawiki branch, specifically in:

• https://github.com/VizGrimoire/GrimoireLib/blob/mediawiki/vizgrimoire/metrics/mediawiki_scr_metrics.py
• https://github.com/VizGrimoire/GrimoireLib/blob/mediawiki/vizgrimoire/metrics/scr_metrics.py (class ReviewsWaitingForReviewerTS)

http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/who_contributes_code.html will be fixed to include updated information in next dashboard update (it is already fixed in github).

In T93943#1193405, @Qgil wrote:

In T93943#1191520, @Sarvesh.onlyme wrote:

@NiharikaKohli, I've implemented microtasks, though they uses a bit different technology as needed for this project. But source code of implementation can be found at https://github.com/sarvesh-onlyme/Mediawiki-Identity-Mapping and prototype at http://serene-brushlands-3632.herokuapp.com/.

Is this from last year? We would welcome at least one microtask completed recently, as we are requiring to all GSoC candidates. Have you discussed this with @Acs and @Dicortazar? T60585 has a couple of proposals for microtasks, although maybe they are not the prototypical microtasks that someone would complete in a couple of hours? You can find more potential microtasks in wikimedia.biterg.io and in general under good first task. Again, the advice of your mentors is crucial here. If you want to be a strong candidate for this project, you should be in touch regularly by now.

The identities information will be managed not only by contributors, but also from admins who can change profiles also.

Filters removed. You can check the new repositories list for git and gerrit in:

In T86154#1042241, @Qgil wrote:

Is this a problem? Many of these are mostly inactive.

Quim, checking the complete list of repositories, you have 1203 repositories.

Ok, so no changes for Bugzilla repositories.

In T88278#1033874, @Qgil wrote:

The most recent "last date" I see is this one:

Mushroom Unknown 2014-01-05

This is a year ago, not 6 months.

In T88278#1032325, @Qgil wrote:

Thanks! The new contributrs table is refreshed, but I'm still seeing very old results in "Who seems to be on the way out or gone?"

Ok, now there is updated information for new and gone contributors:

Working on it now! Once fixed I will report about it here!