Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
GPU: Adreno 619Cores: 8Clock: 2300 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 – an 8-core chipset that was announced on June 8, 2024, and is manufactured using a 6-nanometer process technology. It has 2 cores Cortex-A78 at 2300 MHz and 6 cores Cortex-A55 at 2000 MHz.
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
500600
CPU
158307
GPU
90429
Memory
125063
UX
126801
Total score
500600
Recent AnTuTu 10 Results
The latest AnTuTu Benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samples: 1 of 1
GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Asset compression
107 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser
56.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer
82.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection
42.4 images/sec
HDR
66.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur
5.26 images/sec
Photo processing
22.3 images/sec
Ray tracing
2.88 Mpixels/sec
Smartphones
Click on the device name to view detailed information
Specifications
Detailed specifications of the Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 SoC with Adreno 619 graphics
Architecture
2x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores
8
Frequency
2300 MHz
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Process
6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit)
4 W
Manufacturing
TSMC
GPU name
Adreno 619
Architecture
Adreno 600
GPU frequency
840 MHz
Pipelines
2
Shading units
128
Total shaders
256
FLOPS
430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version
1.1
OpenCL version
2.0
DirectX version
12.1
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon
Memory type
LPDDR4X
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
Bus
2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth
17 Gbit/s
Max size
12 GB
Storage type
UFS 2.2
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Modem
Snapdragon X51
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
5G support
Yes
Download speed
Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi
5
Bluetooth
5.2
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Comparison with competitors