Jump to content

Stewards/elections 2006

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Dan100 (talk | contribs) at 16:03, 20 December 2005 (→No). It may differ significantly from the current version.

Purge the cache

Stewards are people who can give users special flags, give bots bot flags, provide CheckUser information from every project and overally, be good people for Wikimedia.

Warning : stewards are not extra-cops !!! If you wish to be a steward to be able to unsysop people on your own favorite project, forget it. It is generally frowned upon to desysop editors from your home project (best to leave that to neutral stewards).

A plea : most of the activity is likely not to be on your own mother project, but on small languages. To really help, you need to frequently come to meta and to FOLLOW pages of request (for permission, for bot status, for checkuser help). If you wish to apply only to help on your own project, please move on and let the job to others.

Now, who do we need? Someone who:

  • ...could provide some of their free time to do some Steward work
  • ...is multilingual and helpful towards people
  • ...is available
  • ...is an active contributor on meta

Rules

If you want to become a steward, please list yourself below. The voting will start on the 20th December 2005 and it'll end on the 10th January 2006. You can list yourself during that time, but you'll have lower chances then. The Board will choose a group of users (from 1 to 10) who'll gain steward status.

To get through the elections, you must:

  • Gain at least 30 votes in favor
  • At least 80% overall votes in favor
  • Have an account on Meta with a linked account on another project
  • Be active for at least 3 months on that project
  • Preferably show you are active on meta as well (link to your contributions on meta for example, or mention you are already sysop here)

You can provide a short statement regarding your background on Wikimedia, current activity and anything else you want.

Please remember to follow the Steward policies. Also be aware of the fact that inactive stewards will have their steward flag taken away.


Voters: Anyone can vote provided that he/she has a valid account on meta with a link to at least one user page, on a project where the editor is a participant, with at least 3 months participation (not just to his/her userpage but) to the project.
In case of suspicion of sock puppetry, checkusers could be asked to check and sock puppet votes cancelled.

Candidates

The election starts 20th of December 2005 and ends 10th of January 2006.

Jean-Christophe Chazalette

Votes

Yes
  1. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:29, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes Anthere
  3. Yes/Oui. Korg + + 00:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yes Ausir 00:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. yes of course, villy is a reliable user and an attentive admin/bureaucrat; very friendly in addition :-) --:Bdk: 01:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. yes/Да/是/はい--Shizhao 01:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. yes/hao Flcelloguy 01:29, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes -- Get_It 01:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ja/Да/Si/Oui -- BCorr|Брайен 03:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sí/Yes/はい --Taichi - (あ！) 03:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. oui, yes, ja! oscar 04:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  12. yes Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. yes Shanes 07:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. oui Caton 09:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Yes Phe 09:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Oui/Yes/はい Ryo 09:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Oui/Yes le Korrigan bla 11:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Yes Jon Harald Søby 12:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Da/Yes Romihaitza 13:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. yo Gangleri | Th | T 14:51, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Yes Dan100 15:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral - Dake 10:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No

Ausir

  • Language: pl (native), en-4, csb-1 de-1, ru-1).
  • Admin at Polish and English Wikipedia, Commons and Polish Wikinews. I also edit Kashubian Wikipedia. On the projects since February 2004. On meta I mostly deal with translations. I'm available on IRC at #wikipedia, #wikimedia, #wikipedia-pl and other channels most of the time. I'm one of the founding members of Wikimedia Polska. Ausir 12:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • about 180 edits on meta - I haven't been very active here, but I will frequent meta more often if I become a steward.

Votes

Yes
  1. Yes. A great and trustworthy contributor. TOR 00:28, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes Anthere
  4. Yes. Szwedzki 00:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes. villy ♦✎ 00:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yes. Korg + + 01:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes. Borgx 01:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes.--Shizhao 01:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes -- Get_It 01:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sí/Yes/はい --Taichi - (あ！) 03:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. tak, yes, ja oscar 04:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  12. Yes Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yes Phe 09:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yes Gac 10:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Da/Yes Romihaitza 13:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Tak/Oui Wulfstan 13:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. yes / tsca ✉ 14:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Yes Dan100 15:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
No

Romihaitza

Votes

Yes
  1. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes Ausir 00:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes. Korg + + 01:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. yes/Да/是/はい----Shizhao 01:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sí/Yes/はい --Taichi - (あ！) 03:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. yes, ja oscar 04:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  7. yes Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. yes, ja --Mihai Andrei 13:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. da – Mihai is a very motivated Wikipedian. Thanks for your work. Gangleri | Th | T 14:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral Phe 09:33, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No

Evilphoenix

I happened to get a Meta account earlier today, and Vilerage pointed me this way when I mentioned to him an interest in being a Steward, so I shall volunteer for these elections. I can read French with some decency, and Spanish and Latin with slight decency, I have been active on En since May 2005 and an Administrator on En since October 2005. Best regards. Evilphoenix 02:23, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

6 edits on meta

Votes

Yes
Neutral
  1. Neutral. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No. Nothing personal. I just do not know him and consider only editors active on meta and involved in multilingual issues should handle such a job. Electing a person never coming to meta or at least irc is not gonna improve the service. Anthere
  2. No. Not active on Meta (only about 6 contributions). Korg + + 01:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No, agree Korg--Shizhao 01:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. No -- Get_It 01:42, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. No per Anthere. Flcelloguy 02:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. No/いいえ --Taichi - (あ！) 03:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. No. Less qualified than I am, and I'm not qualified. Kelly Martin 05:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. no; nothing personal, possibly just too early an application. oscar 05:16, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  9. no Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. I think that if your main involvement is on en-Wikipedia, then you should be a bureaucrat for a while before trying to become a steward. TacoDeposit 13:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Arno Lagrange

Sorry for asking but why do you candidate again? -Romihaitza 16:12, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
a mystery to me too, see here and here :-S oscar 02:28, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Well, he was elected during the first elections in 2004. And he was quite far away from current requirements (he did not have 30 supports at all). So, it might make sense to reconfirm him anyway. Anthere

Votes

Yes
  1. Yes Phe 09:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. jes – Arno provided valuable help to me when I started. You may not find him always in chats but you can e-mail him. Gangleri | Th | T 15:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral--Shizhao 01:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral --Taichi - (あ！) 03:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. neutral Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral, I can't be favorable or against his candidature - I just don't know him. Dake 10:24, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No. It is a bit hard to say, but I vote no for two reasons. First because he was actually originally elected with quite few votes. Second, while I am sure he will never abuse the tool, I think he is not respecting the spirit of it which is to use it to help all projects and all languages. Arno is fine, but use it only to help eo editors and never take care of other requests. I find the position a little bit questionable. So, I will not mind if he is confirmed, but I have to state that opinion of mine nevertheless. Anthere
  2. Oppose. Wakes up only three or four times a year (of course I'm exagerating a bit) to the extend he actually does not remember he is already a steward. Geez, Arno. villy ♦✎ 00:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No/Non. La plupart de tes actions bureaucratiques ne concernent que la version espérantophone de Wikipédia ; tu devrais justement éviter d'utiliser tes "super-pouvoirs" sur ce projet, et être au service de l'ensemble de la communauté. Par ailleurs je ne t'ai jamais croisé sur IRC... Korg + + 01:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. No Agree with Anthere and villy Borgx 02:51, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. no agree with the arguments stated above by anthere, villy and korg; nothing personal either btw. oscar 05:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  6. Nu/No He used the rights just for eo wikiprojects, he can be just a bureaucrat. Romihaitza 13:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Walter

  • Languages; NL and EN, but I know how to use online translators

I am active on Wikipedia since early 2002, my home wiki is the dutch wikipedia. I am there a sysop on nl.wikipedia for many years now, and also the ambassador.And member of the OTRS- email team for the dutch wikipedia. On Meta I am sysop and active with Wikizine. w:nl:gebruiker:Walter

Votes

Yes
  1. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. yes Anthere 00:45, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes. villy ♦✎ 00:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. yes/Да/是/はい----Shizhao 01:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes. Korg + + 01:25, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yes/Hao Flcelloguy 02:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Sí/Yes/はい --Taichi - (あ！) 03:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. yes, ja! oscar 04:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  9. Ja/Yes Patio 05:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. yes Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. yes Ausir 06:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Yes/Oui/Sí/Ja --Deprifry 06:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yes WebBoy 06:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yes Andre Engels 07:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC) - reliable long-time Wikipedian[reply]
  15. yes/ja/oui Moribunt 08:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Yes SanderSpek 08:51, 20 December 2005 (UTC) - without a doubt[reply]
  17. Yes — empoor™ (consultation) 09:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ja/YesPeter boelens 09:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Yes Phe 09:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Yes Borgx 09:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Yes JoJan 09:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC) The right guy for the right job[reply]
  22. Yes -- Zanaq 09:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes --Frieda 10:42, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Ja, natuurlijk! --pippudoz - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 10:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Yes Jon Harald Søby 12:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yes Catherine 12:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Da/Yes Romihaitza 13:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Ja/Yes Tdevries 15:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
No

Traroth

I'm bureaucrat on wp:fr and admin on wikibooks:en and wikibooks:fr. I'm also member of the arbcom on wp:fr and member of Wikimedia France. I'm a regular contributor on wp:fr, commons and wikinews:fr and more rarely to wp:en and wp:de. I speak french, english and german fluently. Traroth 14:08, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Yes
  1. yes/Да/是/はい--Shizhao 01:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. oui Caton 09:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral. Probably thinks too much of himself and snobs/never answers my mail. Then of course, trust is pretty hard to find out. villy ♦✎ 01:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. neutral Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No. I do not trust this user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. No/Non. Pas assez d'expérience sur Meta (moins de 100 contributions), et je ne t'ai jamais vu sur IRC. Korg + + 01:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No/いいえ --Taichi - (あ！) 04:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. No/Non/Nein - Dake 10:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Klemen Kocjancic

about 100 edits on meta in a year

Votes

Yes
Neutral
  1. Neutral/中立--Shizhao 01:16, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No. Botmasters do not have to edit with their bots, user pages for adding interwikis. This must be chosen by user themselves, and they should prefer to leave, on "foreign" wikis, only a link to the mother language user page. Also, a bot can't never be sure that the same user name on two wikis allows to the same user. So I can't trust this user until he has not given an engagement to stop that stuff. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:35, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. No. Not much experience on Meta (less than 100 contributions). Korg + + 01:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No/いいえ --Taichi - (あ！) 04:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. no Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Paginazero

note: 5 edits on meta.
I realize I am Mr.Nobody on meta pages. Please don't think I advanced my candidation without any awareness of what a steward is expected to do and without any will to participate more actively. Wasting your time has never been my intention.

Votes

Yes
  1. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. yes/Да/是/はい----Shizhao 01:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. yes yes yes He has strong skills to have this role. --Ilario 10:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yes --Senpaiottolo 10:33, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes - Not because is a friend, not because is a very good man, not because he speaks 5 or 6 different language, not because is the most active sysop on the it:wiki, not because is a very generous folk, not because is one of the founding members of Wikimedia Italia, but ... because he is right folk to do the Steward. Listen to me :-) - Gac
  6. Yes, strongly support :-)) Frieda 10:37, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes - very good and active sysop on it.wiki; there is no sense in voting against just because one does not know him (by the way, he made a lot of contribution as non registered user) --Biopresto 10:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes - very skilled person. --Marcok 10:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes --Rosc0 10:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. yes/si/Да - very well known and respected on it.wiki pippudoz - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 10:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Quoting friends above --82.58.164.63 10:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC) --Twice25 11:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Yes, strongly support Svante 11:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yes, strongly support, right person for the task. --Cruccone 12:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yes Catherine 12:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Si/Da/Yes Romihaitza 13:24, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Si/Yes/Tak --Berto 13:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Yes --Civvi 14:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Yes --Archenzo 14:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Yes --Urby2004 14:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Strong support --M/ 14:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. yes agreeing with Gac The Doc 14:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Strong support --Fredericks 14:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC) (I've 9 edits on meta but I come here much more often: Paginazero too, I suppose)[reply]
  23. Yes Dan100 15:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
No
  1. No. Nothing personal. I just do not know him and consider only editors active on meta and involved in multilingual issues should handle such a job. Electing a person never coming to meta or at least irc is not gonna improve the service. Anthere
  2. No. Not active on Meta (only about 6 contributions). Korg + + 01:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No/いいえ --Taichi - (あ！) 04:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. no Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jredmond

  • Language: en, fr-2, es-2, la-1, da-1
  • I have been a registered user on en: since October 2003, and an admin there since July 2005. Though en: occupies most of my time, I also read meta: and commons: regularly, and often work on interwiki links in other projects. - jredmond 18:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
note: not really active on meta (less than 50 edits in more than a year)
I read here several times daily, but only edit when necessary. As a steward, though, I would edit here more often. - jredmond 23:49, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Since you commented... what can you tell us about the rules for check user tools use ? Anthere
I'm not sure exactly what you meant by that question, so I'll try to answer what I think you're asking. :)
Typically, the CheckUser tools are used to investigate vandals and spammers so that admins can apply range blocks or notify ISPs appropriately. Less frequently, the tools can be employed to look for sockpuppetry in votes; to vindicate users accused of sockpuppetry; and to help the Wikimedia Foundation comply with subpoenas and other court orders. The information gathered from the tools should not be released publicly, though — wherever possible, it needs to be generic in nature, and when it must be discussed in detail then that should only be done in strict confidence with a trusted user.
Most larger Wikimedia projects have their own users with access to the tools, so there is virtually no need for a steward to use the tool in those places. However, if a particular project has no such users and has a demonstrated need, then a steward can use the tools to answer yes/no questions about the similarities between two suspected abusers.
Is that what you had in mind? - jredmond 03:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Yes
  1. Yes this user fights vandalism fiercely on en.wiki -- Zanaq 09:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes Catherine 12:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No. Nothing personal. I just do not know him and consider only editors active on meta and involved in multilingual issues should handle such a job. Electing a person never coming to meta or at least irc is not gonna improve the service. Anthere
  2. No/反对/Нет.I not know it.--Shizhao 01:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No. Not much experience on Meta (less than 100 contributions). Korg + + 01:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. No/いいえ --Taichi - (あ！) 04:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. no Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I think that if your main involvement is on en-Wikipedia, then you should be a bureaucrat there for a while before trying to become a steward. TacoDeposit 13:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. No, not active outside of en.wp Dan100 15:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

brian0918

  • Reasons for nomination:
    • I have previously been granted temporary checkuser and admin powers by stewards, and believe I can handle the position.
    • I spend nearly every waking hour on the project, watching the mailing lists, and on IRC (#wikimedia, #wikipedia, and #wikimania, in particular), and can easily be reached in emergencies.
    • Danny suggested that I run :)

If you have any questions, let me know. Thanks!

Votes

Yes
  1. Yes Ausir 03:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. yes Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --yes/Да/是/はい--Shizhao 06:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yes. -- Schnee 06:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes - Danny 09:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yes -- Zanaq 09:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes Catherine 12:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. yes – Gangleri | Th | T 15:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes. Korg + + 15:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral --Taichi - (あ！) 04:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 05:41, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. neutral Anthere 07:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No. Recent interactions with this editor has left me with a sour taste; I do not trust him with steward's rights. Kelly Martin 05:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I think that if your main involvement is on en-Wikipedia, then you should be a bureaucrat there for a while before trying to become a steward. TacoDeposit 13:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No Dan100 15:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Raul654

  • Language: en (native), es-1
  • I've been here for a long time and I'm pretty well known and trusted. I'm a Sysop/bureacrat/arbitrator/checkuser on en, sysop on meta, sysop on commons, OTRS user, and Frazzydee and I run the daily-article-l email list.

Votes

Yes
  1. Yes Ausir 06:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. yes/Да/是/はい--Shizhao 06:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes. Definitely. -- Schnee 06:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 06:32, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes. Shanes 07:24, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sí/Yes/はい --Taichi - (あ！) 08:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes. Malathion 10:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes - indubitably. --Celestianpower 10:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes. Korg + + 11:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Yes Catherine 12:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. yes Datrio 13:45, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. yes Phe 14:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yes --BRIAN0918 14:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yes Dan100 16:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
No

User:Zanaq (withdrawn)

Selfnomination: I am a native Dutchman, mainly interested in Information Technology, Language, Music and (Old) (SF) movies and series.

I like to experience the cross-project activities and am currently contemplating to run a bot. Maybe I should go for operator status on the Dutch or English wiki's first, but I thought, why not give this perceived shortcut a go: honesty and straigtforwardness and adherence to proper conduct is what you may always expect from me. Zanaq 09:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Yes
  1. Yes — empoor™ (consultation) 09:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
No
  1. No Ausir 09:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. No. Nothing personal. I just do not know him and consider only editors active on meta and involved in multilingual issues should handle such a job. Electing a person never coming to meta or at least irc is not gonna improve the service. I also do not see the relationship with setting up a bot. Anthere
  3. no oscar 10:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC) skipping a stage of sysophood on a project is not a good idea imho.[reply]
  4. No. Not active on Meta (only about 5 contributions). Korg + + 11:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    and those aren't even real contributions. ;-) Zanaq 11:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. no Datrio 13:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I get the message. Let's not waste anymore time voting no: I retract my candidacy. I thank Empoor for his support, and Oscar for his well-motivated vote. Zanaq 13:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Harald Søby

  • Languages: no, en-3, de-1, da-1, sv-1, es-1, eo-1
    I also have a special interest in languages, so I can understand more languages than these, e.g. French, Italian, Russian, Icelandic, Faroese, etc., even without having been trained in them.
  • I have been admin on the Norwegian Wikipedia since April 2005, and bureaucrat since October (I have some 21,000+ edits there). I am also an admin in the Nauruan Wikipedia (though I understand that nawiki is not very popular around here, for reasons which I might understand – it having no native speakers), and I am also very active in the English Wiktionary, and quite active on Commons (in form of uploading) and Meta (in form of reading rules et al) and updating myself, not so much editing yet). I am also very often on IRC (nickname Jhs@freenode). Jon Harald Søby 12:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Yes
  1. Datrio 13:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC) I trust him, knowing him a bit from the IRC channels[reply]
  2. Yes, Sí, Oui, Ja, Já--birdy (:> )=| 14:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC) knowing him from IRC too. He fights vandalism. I trust him.[reply]
  3. Ja --Boivie 14:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC) He would be appreciated as steward.[reply]
  4. Ja / Habj 14:29, 20 December 2005 (UTC) I think he has judgement and knows what it's about. Being a norwegian, he can communicate with people at svwiki and dawiki without major problems - we can use him :-)[reply]
  5. Yes/Oui/Sí/Ja --Deprifry 14:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yes. Responsible and experienced user; often on IRC. /The Phoenix 15:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. jes – Gangleri | Th | T 15:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes. Korg + + 15:37, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes. --Duffman 15:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Yes Dan100 16:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No

Suisui

  • Language: ja(native) en-2 and I can read some more languages with machine translation
  • I'm mainly active on Japanese Wikipedia since 2003, admin since 2003 March, and bureaucrat since 2004 March, have around 40,000 edits (38,105 now). also joining info-ja team (something like arbcom in other project), owner of wikija-l.
  • I'm also admin on meta (here), have 1039 edits. and also editor at wikimediafoundation site have about 800 edits.
  • I also have admin Japanese WikiQuote and Japanese WikiBooks and have some activities on English projects.
  • I use IRC, acceptable at #wikimedia, #wikipedia-ja, #wikipedia and other some channels most of time.
  • I use pywikipediabot on ja.wikipedia, named SuisuiBot --Suisui 14:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Yes
  1. yes! Datrio 14:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes Kstigarbha 14:32, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yes. Korg + + 14:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes Tietew✍ 14:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yes Suguri F 14:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes --Goki 14:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes --Miya 14:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes --Hermeneus 15:35, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
No
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2006&oldid=256667"