Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Lechatjaune (talk | contribs) at 00:20, 11 November 2009 (+links). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure. Minimum voting requirement are listed here.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

(translate | edit)

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- Don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- Such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case this is for multiple users, leave this field blank and give a list of these users in your remarks.
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== user name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

See administrator for information about the position. Requests for removal of access belong in another section. Admins doing cross-wiki work may wish to see IRC/wikimedia-admin for information about joining #wikimedia-admin.

If you are requesting administrator status to translate the wiki interface, this should be done at the BetaWiki project instead (see mw:localisation). You can ask questions in the IRC channel or on the mailing list.

If you are requesting adminship to handle one-time vandalism incidents or clearing a deletion backlog, please see Vandalism reports and Steward requests/Speedy deletions.

Stewards
Currently-active temporary permissions are listed at /Approved temporary; copy granted requests to the appropriate section there, stating the date of removal in the section header and at the bottom of the request. Please invite new sysops to the admin IRC channel.
Archiving
Requests only need remain listed below for a few days, and may afterward be removed as long as they have been copied to the subpage. Users who archive requests on that page, please check if the request was correctly added to the temporary subpage before removing it from this page.

For permanent sysopship please provide a link to the local community approval. For temporary sysopship please state for how long and for which tasks you need it, and link to a local announcement.


小躍@hak.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

I want to make Wikipedia's contributions in the Hakka wiki. Don’t encounter any destruction,so I work as time the Administrator, Can the management edition, the protection, delete the page and restore the page, and manage all users.--林躍錩 11:15, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think he is asking for extension to his sysop status as his temporary permission expires on 24 Nov 2009—Bencmq 11:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please make an annoucement on hakwiki about this, so if users don't want you to continue we will know? Otherwise, I'll prolong this closer to the expiry date.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 18:28, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marmzok@ckbwiki

Status:    Done

Hi. I request Administrator and Bureaucrat accesses for our new Wikipedia after the community voting. The election started 16/10/2009 and ended 31/10/2009. Thanks --Marmzok 13:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Half-done - granted sysop status. Ckb.wiki has only one sysop (after that two sysops), relatively small community, in my opinion it's not enough for granting bureaucrat access. Moreover, please look at bureaucrat: "A small community generally doesn't require a local bureaucrat, because stewards can easily handle the low traffic of requests from that wiki with little delay; generally a user with this access is not needed until several local administrators are present.". Other opinions? LeinaD (t) 15:32, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. No need for crats just yet, I don't think. ++Lar: t/c 17:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've marked this request as completed.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 18:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Amdf@mhr.wikipedia

Status:    In progress

My sysop access will expire 15-11-2009, please prolong it. амдф 15:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please make a local announcement so if others object they can say so. - Andre Engels 23:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. амдф 19:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I support. Azimbaj 11:51, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

J.delanoy@tpiwiki

Status:    Done

I temporarily assigned J.delanoy administrator access on tpiwiki to clear a deletion backlog, there being no active local administrators. He is now done and the access was revoked. —Pathoschild 18:07:07, 06 November 2009 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

See bureaucrat for information about the position. In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.

Borislav@bg.wikinews

Excuse me for reviving this discussion so soon after it was archived, but I feel that certain details were not well explained which led to some haste and waste. Since I am also in touch with these details, I'd like to mend the matters and explain again why is this request for an exception of the general rules.

The Bulgarian contributing community is relatively small, not enough human resources to cover all sister projects and most of the people who voluntarily contribute to Wikimedia are those who contribute to Wikipedia. Another reason, especially concerning BG Wikinews, may be that, to the best of my knowledge, we don't have in Bulgaria a news media that originally releases news under free license, so we don't have such a free data source, while using non-free media (paraphrasing texts, access to images) consumes more efforts than those available.

Now, one of our wikipedians Grigor Gatchev (Григор Гачев, check SUL, a local user, bot operator, holder of several own wikis, programmer and active promoter of free software) used his personal contacts and managed to convince one relatively small but flexible Bulgarian news media to release some of its content under CC-BY. He also programmed a special bot to wikify and import this content on a daily basis, roughly 20-30 articles per day. Which already comprises a big resource, at least big for our humble standards; and freely licensed, which is no less victory :)

So, he will need bot status. But before he leaves the bot running, he will need to first make some tests which require the flag be changed on, off, on, off... (due to some already encountered problems with captcha and other fine tunings). Which means either constantly bugging stewards with such requests (which would take much more time, efforts) or the other option is that we have a local bureaucrat on BG Wikinews, and so far there is only one admin, Borislav, the person who once requested the opening of all BG projects and has been given either bureaucrat or admin rights in all of them (check his SUL and user rights). This is why Grigor used the phrase "natural choice" in his first request.

Our point is that presently there is nothing in BG Wikinews, around which a community may be built, while Grigor's efforts to run the news bot may very soon break the vicious circle and bring readers, and of course editors. An explanation was given that the wiki must have at least 5 admins in order to apply for crat, but with a *currently* active and interested community tending to zero this simply cannot happen in reasonable time.

So a community may start forming, only when there is *something* around which they may gather, a resource, which has lacked for about 6 years, and only now we have the chance to have it. Once we have the content, admins and crats will be very soon really needed to clean after the (inevitable) vandals, to help operating the bot (giving and removing the flag when needed) and do maintenance which is not accessible to regular editors. One admin will not be able to do all the job, while the lack of a crat to facilitate the bot operator's job will hinder its initial fine-tuning which may affect the quality of the bot job. It is not a good idea to make the project's progress constantly dependent on stewards for decisions of purely operational nature.

In other words, it is really an exceptional request that we'd like to be granted more trust than the usual procedure provides, but the idea and the expected result is really promising and the people involved (Borislav and Grigor, after writing you - me too :-) ) are not going to abuse this trust, as we haven't done it so far in all other sister projects where we actively contribute. Thank you in advance. →Spiritia 20:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've spoken independently to Spiritia. Given the user involved and the nature of the request, as the local project is intending on granting and removing the bot flag, and that I'm convinced that doing this supports the growth of the nascent Bulgarian Wikinews project. bastique demandez! 20:05, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Does that communication address the reasons it wasn't done originally?  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:11, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it addresses the fact that the reason it wasn't done before was per policy, and that I've granted it as an exception to the policy, in my position, because I'm convinced it will foster the growth of the project. I've also acknowledged that it was declined before per policy, as was appropriate. bastique demandez! 20:16, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, you granted him bureaucrat flag (I'm bit confused), but who will control what happens on bg.wikinews? If this is an exception, it should be somehow controlled. In my opinion permanent bureaucrat should be turned into temporary access - on one year period with possibility of prolongation. It's too small project for permanent bureaucrat. LeinaD (t) 11:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
who will control what happens on bg.wikinews? -- what this has to do with bureaucrat privileges? --Петър Петров 10:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Granting administrator access by bureaucrat have to base on decision of community, but bg.wikinews is a very small community, so it should be controlled. LeinaD (t) 14:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In view of the fact that bureaucrat right has been granted as an exception to the policy, it must be on special condition: temporary access. Bureaucrat right has been turned into temporary access, expires: 8-11-2010. Please come back a few days before the status expires to prolong it or hold a local voting if the community grows. Note for stewards: Before prolonging please check bureaucrat's activity. LeinaD (t) 16:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser access

To request CheckUser information, see Meta:Requests for CheckUser information. This is the place to request CheckUser access. Note that temporary CheckUser access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
When someone asks for CheckUser status, please check the current policy before giving the status. There is an email template to request identification from the new CU. Do not grant CU access unless the user is identified to the Foundation. Breaching these rules may be cause for removing your steward access. When you give someone CheckUser, please list them on CheckUser, ask them to subscribe to checkuser-l, email checkuser-l-owner@lists.wikimedia.org so the listadmins know the person is allowed on the mailing list, and make sure they contact an op for access to #wikimedia-checkuser.

IvanLanin@id.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I'm replacing the previous retired CheckUser. Above is the voting page. I've sent my proof of identity via email to the Foundation. Thank you. ivanlanin ♫ 11:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for Carys announcement of received identification. Laaknor 11:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
User has been identified: diff. --Barras 17:18, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. LeinaD (t) 17:19, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. •• ivanlanin ♫ 18:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic@enwiki

Status:    In progress

For the Arbitration Committee, Risker 22:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jredmond@enwiki

Status:    In progress

For the Arbitration Committee, Risker 22:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MBisanz@xxenwiki

Status:    In progress

For the Arbitration Committee, Risker 23:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight access

To request to have content oversighted
Ask in #wikimedia-stewards, or email oversight-l@lists.wikimedia.org for requests regarding English Wikipedia.
Note that this section is the place to request Oversight access. Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by stewards.
Stewards
Do not grant Oversight access unless the user is identified to the foundation, which will be announced on the Identification noticeboard. When you give someone oversight access, list them on Oversight.

Dominic@enwiki

Status:    In progress

For the Arbitration Committee, Risker 22:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jredmond@enwiki

Status:    In progress

For the Arbitration Committee, Risker 22:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MBisanz@xxenwiki

Status:    In progress

For the Arbitration Committee, Risker 23:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of access

If you're requesting the removal of your own status, make sure you're logged in to a global account. Please remember - should you have more than one flag - to state clearly which you wish to remove and which to retain.

To request the removal of another user's status, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. All discussion must take place on your local wiki. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, a trusted person from that wiki should provide a link here to the discussion, a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. In either case, copy and paste the following text into the correct section (see instructions above). 

==== username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = 
 |user name =  
 |discussion= <!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
}}

Adilch@ur.wikipedia

Status:    Done
Removal of access has been done, would you please leave a further notice to this user, thanking him for his past work as a sysop? Thank you, M/ 22:30, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! And I have left a message of thanks on his talk page. --Urdutext 02:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aalahazrat@ur.wikipedia

Status:    Done
Removal of access has been done, would you please leave a further notice to this user, thanking him for his past work as a sysop? Thank you, M/ 22:30, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! And I have left a message of thanks on his talk page.--Urdutext 02:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sphl@ja.wikipedia

Status:    Done

He/she does/did not have edit activities for three months since 10:45, 8 August 2009 (UTC). According to de-sysop policy of ja.wikiprdia, I request to remove his/her sysop access. Thank you.--Hitachi-Train 11:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please leave him/her a notice on talk page (and a "thank you" for his/her past work as a sysop) in japanese language? Thanks. --M/ 22:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I noticed him/her on talk page. Please check it.--Web comic 03:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Thanks a lot.
--M/ 09:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Basvb@nlwikipedia

Status:    Done

Own request - Greetings, Basvb 18:26, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you for your work. --M/ 22:04, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andre Engels@nlwikipedia

Status:    Done

Own request - Andre Engels 21:58, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andre, you're listed both as a sysop and a checkuser. Is only one flag that you want to have removed?
Thank you, M/ 22:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the unclarity and thanks for asking. It's the sysop flag I would like removed. - Andre Engels 22:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay done, thanks for your kindness and your work as a sysop. --M/ 22:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Swind@ja.wikipedia

Status:    Done

He/she does/did not have edit activities for three months since 11:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC). According to de-sysop policy of ja.wikiprdia, I request to remove his/her sysop access. And I left notice his/her talk page. Thank you.--Hitachi-Train 12:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to the user for his pas work as a sysop. --M/ 12:54, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Metodicar@sr.wikipedia

Status:    Done
Yes, that's all right. Thank you for your work as a sysop.
Ciao, M/ 22:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did my best to do my job conscientiously. Thank you and ciao. :)--Metodicar 22:45, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You really didn't need this. :( --FiliP ██ 22:47, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Liesel@dewiki

Status:    Done
Done --Mardetanha talk 12:55, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Lechatjaune@ptwikipedia

Status:    In progress

Please remove my bureaucrat access due to the end of my term. Lechatjaune 00:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leonardo.stabile@ptwikipedia

Status:    In progress

Please remove his bureaucrat access due to the end of his term. Lechatjaune 00:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alexanderps@ptwikipedia

Status:    In progress

Please remove his bureaucrat access due to the end of his term. Lechatjaune 00:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Requests that don't fit in other sections belong here. Import rights can be granted by stewards only, not bureaucrats, so the automatic list of local bureaucrats is irrelevant for this. Please gather community consensus before placing a link to the discussion here.

Note that the following types of requests belong on separate pages:


User:Ciphers@arwiki for import

Status:    In progress

Hi, i would like to request the importer rights on arabic wikipedia for my account for trial. I may change these rights to my bot account later in case the trial worked as expected. link to the local request is here, sorry it is in Arabic. thanks! --Ciphers 11:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold as you just added this on 2009-11-05.--Jusjih 02:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, no problem. --Ciphers 03:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Steward requests/Permissions/Footer

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions&oldid=1717893"