SHB2000

This is a Wikimedia global user page.
If you find this page on any site other than a Wikimedia one, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with the site. The original page is located at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:SHB2000.

Hello there, I'm SHB2000. I am available to assist you. Please feel free to reach out to me through my talk page or via email (for autoconfirmed users).

Userpage

This user is a global sysop. (verify)

This user is a global rollbacker. (verify)

This user is an administrator on Meta-Wiki. (verify)

This user is an administrator on English Wikivoyage. (verify)

This user is a bureaucrat on English Wikivoyage. (verify)

This user is a Wikibooks administrator (English) (verify).

This user has file mover rights on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)

180,000+

This user has made over 180,000 contributions to Wikimedia projects.

W?F

This Wikimedian opposes rebranding the WMF as Wikipedia.

This user uses SWViewer to revert vandalism.

This user is a member of the Small Wiki Monitoring Team.

This user supports the UCoC and pledges to adhere to it.

User language

en-N	This user has a native understanding of English.

fr-1	Cet utilisateur dispose de connaissances de base en français.

SHB2000

Any pronouns fine.

My Work

Hello there. My home wiki is the English Wikivoyage, but I'm also active on Wikimedia Commons and the English Wikibooks. I also sporadically edit the English Wikipedia and the French Wikivoyage. I occasionally edit a few other projects and do some x-wiki patrolling. I'm a mesomedian on all the projects in question, except the English Wikibooks where I only do administrative tasks. You can contact me via my talk page or email (for autoconfirmed users). I don't usually use IRC; I find it too dated.

About Me

I do many things, but I'm generally passionate about travel, specifically nature. I find myself working on such topics when working on content topics (and am proud to have created over 10 per cent of the English Wikivoyage's park articles and 1 per cent of the wiki's total articles). Otherwise, I usually clean up content and revert vandalism, spam and other vandal gobbledegook. I'm a global sysop and global rollbacker and hold the following other permissions:

sysop and bureaucrat on the English Wikivoyage.
patroller, rollbacker and file mover on Wikimedia Commons.
sysop and reviewer on the English Wikibooks.
sysop on Meta-Wiki.
rollbacker on the English Wikipedia.
patroller on the French Wikivoyage.
rollbacker on Wikidata.

Personal thoughts and opinions

I don't exactly agree with not mentioning the usernames of LTAs, nor do I agree with completely avoiding discussions on what to do with them – it makes things needlessly complicated.
Abuse filters should not be a place to have admins-only discussions. If this does happen, I will not participate in it.
Logs should rarely be revision deleted. Admins should be held accountable for their actions; revision deleting logs will create a system open to abuse.
Copying content word-for-word from one project to another should generally be avoided. It hampers a wiki's potential to grow due to a SEO penalty.
A wiki that doesn't accept standard globally-accepted norms cannot expect to significantly grow without pissing off its editors.
No gratitude should be given to serial copyright violators. I'm all for a "one warning, then you're out" policy for copyright violators (outside Commons). If someone has been given a harshly worded warning for copyright violations and then still does it again, then why should we trust them to not make another one yet?
Block evasion shouldn't be allowed – no excuses whatever. Period.
- I'm all for using Wikipedia's duck test to identify IP sockpuppets as CUs cannot publically connect IPs with accounts. Maybe this wouldn't be an issue had the WMF never allowed anons to edit.
Hat collectors and single-purpose accounts often don't have the intention to genuinely improve Wikimedia.
I'm all for requesting comments on high-profile pages, but if you are going to do that, don't make it sound like canvassing, or worse yet, canvass.
Minor, simple issues can be resolved without the need to request comments on a high-profile page.
Don't make edits that have the potential to break links or files if you're on a lousy Wi-Fi network.
Keeping templates to a minimum will always fail. I wrote an essay about this on en:voy:User:SHB2000/Why keeping templates to a minimum will fail, and although it is a bit English Wikivoyage-specific, it does apply to most WMF projects.
Admins should not be allowed to furtively get away with misusing their tools. Unfortunately, on smaller WMF projects, the lack of oversight means this is very common.
Never think about using Wikitravel. It's the inferior, for-profit, out-of-date predecessor version of Wikivoyage (edit: hi Internet Brands). See en:voy:Wikivoyage:Wikivoyage and Wikitravel for some context.
Using bright yellow text does nothing more than hurt my eyes. Unless it's being used with a black background, for the love of those with visual impairments (myself included), don't use yellow text.
If you're an admin and semi-protect your talk page indefinitely, you need to have at least one way for anons to contact you. Otherwise, it is an attempt to cut off communication.
User talk pages are not "private talk pages". Use emails or some off-wiki chat for that.

Admin statements

I didn't want to have identical text on several wikis, so here it is. As an admin, here are a few things that I will and won't do:

I have no authority to unilaterally change or use IAR to bypass most policies that are not out-of-date or relevant.
I will not use my admin tools in an edit war or interwiki dispute (even if it is with another administrator who uses their tools against me) unless it's an egregious case of vandalism, POV pushing, obvious trolling or some other policy violation that would warrant a block.
For blocked users, I am not your proxy. Any request on my talk page regarding your block should only be about your block. If you're looking to use me as a proxy, no matter how hard you try and convince me, the answer will always be no.
I tend to avoid deleting pages in RfD discussions that I initiated, but there is a clear consensus, or if the discussion has gone stale even after a request for another user to handle the request for a certain period (usually 4–7 days).
For touts on the English Wikivoyage, if your edit was reverted, I will not rewrite your reverted edit unless it's a very mild case of touting.
I rarely revision delete logs. See #Personal thoughts and opinions for why.
I can come out as harsh on users with blocks on other WMF projects due to en.voy's one-strike policy (en.wb does not have one, but my stance is still the same with users continuing their disruption).
I will use the DUCK test at my discretion, provided that it's appropriate.
If you cast aspersions at me just to get a permission, chances are, you're not because of your incivility.