Wikidata:Property proposal/reference vocabulary
reference vocabulary
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Motivation
editA proposed companion property to "stated in reference as"
Where standardisation has been done of a name or a term given in a reference, it is useful to identify the controlled vocabulary from which the name or the term has been taken. In MARC records from libraries, this information is sometimes given in subfield $2 for many fields. In other cases there may be known external authorities that the source is preferentially aligned against. Jheald (talk) 21:54, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Proposed. Jheald (talk) 21:54, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support David (talk) 08:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Support Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 04:12, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose add statements to description of resource instead --- Jura 17:37, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Jura1: I am not sure that I understand your objection. Yes of course one can and should have Carl Linnaeus (Q1043) Library of Congress authority ID (P244) "n79109333", subject named as (P1810) "Linné, Carl von, 1707-1778". But this property is trying to do something slightly different.
- This property relates to how a name has been given in a reference. Wikidata:Property proposal/stated in reference as has been proposed to state how the name was given. But if we know the controlled vocabulary that the form has been standardised against, it is useful to record that too.
- For example, as an extreme case, some different vocabularies might give the same words different shades of meaning, leading us to match the same words to different items when they are being used in different vocabularies. (This can also happen eg with dynasties of painters, where the painter identified as 'II' in one vocabulary may be 'III' in another). Identifying the vocabulary as well as the stated form, when recording how the information was presented in a particular source, can therefore be quite relevant; as well as considerably assisting any later process of checking identifications of the objects of statements. Jheald (talk) 21:01, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- I think one can add Library of Congress Name Authority File (Q18912790) to the entity for the property Property:P4327 rather than as qualifier to each statement using it. I'm also somewhat skeptical about the other proposals, but I suppose we can live with a bunch of subproperties of essentially the same. --- Jura 16:41, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Jheald: I would have used stated in (P248) for these examples - why is it not sufficient? − Pintoch (talk) 11:47, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: We would already be using stated in (P248) with values Biodiversity Heritage Library (Q172266), British Library online catalogue (Q53556514) respectively, as a qualifier, giving the catalogues that were the direct source of the data. I think it could be confusing to also use stated in (P248) in a reference, but with a different value, to give the controlled vocabularies that the terminology of those catalogue entries had in turn been conformed to. Jheald (talk) 12:11, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Jodi.a.schneider, Pintoch, Jheald, Jura1: Done: reference vocabulary (P5967). − Pintoch (talk) 17:41, 14 October 2018 (UTC)