Property talk:P452

Latest comment: 1 month ago by AllyD in topic Loosen Subject Type Constraint?

Documentation

industry
specific industry of company or organization
DescriptionIndustry of company, activity sector. Use field of work (P101) for people.
Representsindustry (Q268592), economic sector (Q3958441)
Data typeItem
Template parameteren:template:infobox company : industry
Domain
According to this template: organization (Q43229), mainly company (Q783794).
According to statements in the property:
organization (Q43229), specialty (Q1047113), fictional organization (Q14623646), occupation (Q12737077), fictional company (Q5446565), fictional profession (Q17305127), brand (Q431289), project (Q170584), service (Q7406919), economic activity (Q8187769), professional certification (Q16023913), person or organization (Q106559804), juridical person (Q155076), facility (Q13226383), publication (Q732577), trade fair (Q57305), fictional speciality (Q126090321), fictional analog of an occupation (Q115580828), fictional brand (Q1412386), fictional facility (Q108117266) or fictional publication (Q126035188)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed valuesindustrial sector (Q8148) - industries or fields (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
ExampleRed Hat (Q485593)software industry (Q880371)
IBM (Q37156)software industry (Q880371)
computer industry (Q1067601)
Sourceen:template:infobox company industry (note: this information should be moved to a property statement; use property source website for the property (P1896))
Robot and gadget jobsShould be able to import from English Wikipedia
Tracking: sameCategory:Wikidata - Comparison of values: suitable for: field of activity (Q42533390)
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P452 (Q23909026)
See alsofield of this occupation (P425)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total389,374
Main statement389,060>99.9% of uses
Qualifier288<0.1% of uses
Reference26<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Type “organization (Q43229), specialty (Q1047113), fictional organization (Q14623646), occupation (Q12737077), fictional company (Q5446565), fictional profession (Q17305127), brand (Q431289), project (Q170584), service (Q7406919), economic activity (Q8187769), professional certification (Q16023913), person or organization (Q106559804), juridical person (Q155076), facility (Q13226383), publication (Q732577), trade fair (Q57305), fictional speciality (Q126090321), fictional analog of an occupation (Q115580828), fictional brand (Q1412386), fictional facility (Q108117266), fictional publication (Q126035188): item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “organization (Q43229), specialty (Q1047113), fictional organization (Q14623646), occupation (Q12737077), fictional company (Q5446565), fictional profession (Q17305127), brand (Q431289), project (Q170584), service (Q7406919), economic activity (Q8187769), professional certification (Q16023913), person or organization (Q106559804), juridical person (Q155076), facility (Q13226383), publication (Q732577), trade fair (Q57305), fictional speciality (Q126090321), fictional analog of an occupation (Q115580828), fictional brand (Q1412386), fictional facility (Q108117266), fictional publication (Q126035188)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P452#Type Q43229, Q1047113, Q14623646, Q12737077, Q5446565, Q17305127, Q431289, Q170584, Q7406919, Q8187769, Q16023913, Q106559804, Q155076, Q13226383, Q732577, Q57305, Q126090321, Q115580828, Q1412386, Q108117266, Q126035188, SPARQL
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P452#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P452#Entity types
Conflicts with “instance of (P31): film (Q11424): this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P452#Conflicts with P31, search, SPARQL
  Value film studio (Q375336) will be automatically replaced to value film industry (Q1415395) and moved to instance of (P31) property.
Testing: TODO list
  Value software company (Q1058914) will be automatically replaced to value software industry (Q880371).
Testing: TODO list
  Value software (Q7397) will be automatically replaced to value software industry (Q880371).
Testing: TODO list
  Value video game (Q7889) will be automatically replaced to value video game industry (Q941594).
Testing: TODO list
  Value paper (Q11472) will be automatically replaced to value pulp and paper industry (Q2283886).
Testing: TODO list
  Value perfume (Q131746) will be automatically replaced to value cosmetics industry (Q12752882).
Testing: TODO list
  Value cosmetics (Q131207) will be automatically replaced to value cosmetics industry (Q12752882).
Testing: TODO list
  Value type of restaurant (Q7860960) will be automatically replaced to value restaurant industry (Q104714944).
Testing: TODO list
  Value cinema (Q16144339) will be automatically replaced to value film industry (Q1415395) and moved to instance of (P31) property.
Testing: TODO list
  Value music publishing company (Q1917775) will be automatically replaced to value music publishing (Q16023726) and moved to instance of (P31) property.
Testing: TODO list
  Value oil company (Q14941854) will be automatically replaced to value petroleum industry (Q862571) and moved to instance of (P31) property.
Testing: TODO list
  Value textile (Q28823) will be automatically replaced to value textile industry (Q607081).
Testing: TODO list
  Value clothing (Q11460) will be automatically replaced to value clothing industry (Q11828862).
Testing: TODO list
  Value film production company (Q1762059) will be automatically replaced to value filmmaking (Q932586) and moved to instance of (P31) property.
Testing: TODO list
 
This property is being used by:

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Question

edit

Sorry, I had not noticed this proposal, but is there any point in having a different property for companies and for people, ie, cant we use P:P101 ? --Zolo (talk) 09:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

It seems for industry/economic sector of companies. --  Docu  at 12:37, 27 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Non-profits and charities

edit

Shall we use this to indicate that Greenpeace (Q81307)'s purpose/focus is environmentalism (Q2855609)? I am thinking it would be best, rather than create a new property which is essentially the same. Danrok (talk) 21:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Value=instance vs class

edit

It seems to be too restrictive that require the industry to be an instance-of rather than subclass-of. There is a relatively large number of exceptions, which suggests that it might be better to change this property to allow it being applied with items that are a subclass of Q8148? Josephguillaume (talk) 09:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

I changed "instance of" (Q21503252) to "instance or subclass of" (Q30208840). --Neo-Jay (talk) 13:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Adding processes to acceptable subclasses?

edit

e.g. d:Q10843872 and its daughters like industrial process, manufacturing process etc. ? Retired electrician (talk) 16:08, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Loosen Subject Type Constraint?

edit

Last month I opened a Project Chat topic about "Populated places and their industries", with specific examples of what I seek to capture and utilise. This property would seem to be the best placement for such data, were it not constrained to companies rather than places. While corporations are the main modern carrier for economic activity, the constraint seems unnecessary, and preventing capture of economic information in the many towns and villages where individuals or families carry on activities (fishing, weaving, etc.). Should the present constraint persist or be adapted? AllyD (talk) 09:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Return to "P452" page.