Property talk:P3844
Documentation
identifier for films in the synchronisation database Deutsche Synchronkartei
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3844#Single value, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3844#Conflicts with P4834, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3844#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3844#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3844#Scope, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3844#Label in 'de' language, search, SPARQL
This property is being used by: Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
|
|
Discussion
editDubbings of film with own WD-Item
editI propose to expand the domain of this property by dubbing of film (Q26204053):
The Deutsche Synchronkartei (Q1204237) is actually not a database of films, but of dubbing of film (Q26204053). I know that most dubbings of films don't have their own item (and probably never will have) and for those it should be ok to add this identifier to the work for pragmatic reasons. But there exist items for dubbings (e.g. 101 Dalmatiner (Q27148028)) and 101 Dalmatiner (Q27148283)) and I think in those cases this identifier should be used for the dubbing - especially as there can exist more than one German dubbing for one film. -- Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 09:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- I extended the domain. --Pasleim (talk) 11:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Valentina.Anitnelav, Pasleim: Should the ID be removed from the film, if an dubbing of film (Q26204053) of the film exists? Otherwise an exception for duplicates based on the type dubbing of film (Q26204053) would be perfect, though I don't know if something like this is possible?!--CENNOXX (talk) 07:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- I would tend to remove it from the film (but if somebody prefers to keep it on both I would not mind either). - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 09:32, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Valentina.Anitnelav, Pasleim: Should the ID be removed from the film, if an dubbing of film (Q26204053) of the film exists? Otherwise an exception for duplicates based on the type dubbing of film (Q26204053) would be perfect, though I don't know if something like this is possible?!--CENNOXX (talk) 07:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Multiple Dubbing-Versions vs. Single Value Constraint
editNotified participants of WikiProject Movies
There are many films with multiple dubbing versions (for example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q232227#P3844) because one is for television, the other for the cinema, sometimes because of the rights or you can't find out why there are two or more versions. The Deutsche Synchronkartei (Q1204237) marks them with version and states when they were created. I would add a qualifier publication date (P577), which distinguishes the items from each other, if nobody has anything against it?--CENNOXX (talk) 07:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- So sometimes, there is only the comment 1. version or 2. version, so the publishing date isn't given every time.--CENNOXX (talk) 08:18, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- @CennoxX: Another interesting property that can be used is distribution format (P437). Escudero (talk) 09:25, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have now added some separator (P4155).--CENNOXX (talk) 10:55, 1 September 2018 (UTC)