Abstract
African urbanisation is at the crossroad. Despite the ever-growing urban challenges and rapid transformation of cities in Africa, there is a positive trend of knowledge production and dynamic policy reforms aiming at a better management of urbanisation and related development fields. The discourse on current African urban challenges and prospects is calling for a change of perspective in understanding urban Africa from its own sociocultural and historical context. Scholars, for instance, (Connell, Plan Theory 13:210–223, 2014), (Robinson, J. (2006) Ordinary cities: between modernity and development. London; New York: Routledge (Questioning cities); Robinson, Int J Urban Reg Res 35:1–23, 2011)) and (Watson, V. (2009) ‘Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues’, 46(11), pp. 2259–2275; Watson, Plan Theory Pract 15:62–76, 2014b) argue that the diversity and uniqueness of each urban context developing at the intersection of local, regional and global challenges, threats and production of knowledge. In light of this, the chapter gives an insight into the conceptual framing of this book, including the key thematic areas; and an overview of topics covered by the chapters. The book has three thematic areas: planning theories and Models; the state of planning education and capacity; participatory and multi-governance approach towards current urban challenges. Under these themes, the chapter introduces several cases from various cities across Africa.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Urbanisation
- Planning Theories
- Planning Models
- Planning Education
- Planning Practice
- Multi-Level Governance
1.1 Background to the Concept of the Book: Planning Cities in Africa
Urbanisation and climate change were at the centre of our dialogue when the idea of this book was initiated. Its topics have been the focus of global and national policies and research such as the Sustainable Development Goals, for example, Goal 11 on Sustainable Cities and Communities, (United Nation 2015) and the New Urban Agenda (UN-HABITAT 2017), which vows to “commit … to strengthening the resilience of cities and human settlements, including through the development of quality infrastructure and spatial planning (…), especially in risk-prone areas of formal and informal settlements.” The topics are linked with key local, regional and global factors posing a huge challenge to socioeconomic and natural systems and assets (Parnell and Walawege 2011; Addaney et al. 2017; Cobbinah et al. 2017; CRED and UNDRR 2020; Biesbroek et al. 2022).
Cities in the Global South are overwhelmed by an ever-growing demand for affordable housing and urban services. This is indeed a paramount challenge that African cities must deal with albeit their encumbered capacity. For instance, the absolute number of people living in urban areas has almost doubled, despite the fact that the proportion of residents living in slum settlements of African cities has slightly declined (UN-Habitat 2016). In cities such as Addis Ababa and Dar es Salaam, people living in slum or informal settlements account for more than 50 per cent of the total urban population (ibid.). This means that these cities must find a way to improve the substandard housing and sanitation conditions, and supply basic services for more than half of their population, while managing all other urban development issues related to environment, mobility, waste management and the like (Blanco et al. 2009; Parnell and Walawege 2011; Alem and Namangaya 2021). In addition to this dire situation, flood-related risks and the frequency and intensity of the resulting disasters are increasing. These are to some extent impacted by global climate change which causes erratic rainfall patterns and an increase in temperature (Addaney et al. 2017; Cobbinah et al. 2017; Addaney and Cobbinah 2019). However, the flood risk is a sum of these problems affecting the pattern of urban settlements, degradation of green and blue infrastructure and encumbered urban management capacity. Increasingly, informal settlements on hazardous and eco-sensitive areas are almost the norm in African urban landscapes and also in Latin America and Asia (Blanco et al. 2009; Greiving et al. 2018).
Concurrent to this, the body of literature and focus of discourses on urban studies are bringing new perspectives and approaches to understand urbanisation in Africa and sociocultural resources. These new perspectives and approaches enable an understanding of cities and urbanisation in Africa from their own sociocultural and historical perspective (Simone 2004, 2010; Fourchard 2011; Robinson 2011; Connell 2014). These approaches help to correct and update the Euro-American centric view that mostly sees African cities as synonymous with crisis and disaster (Fourchard 2011; Myers 2011; Robinson 2011). Despite the trends towards a change of perspective and calls to actualise and reform planning in Africa, in practice, there seems to be little change (Robinson 2006; Watson 2009, 2011, 2014b; Comaroff and Comaroff 2012; Cain 2014; De Satgé and Watson 2018). For the most part, planning education and practice in Africa are rooted in and originated from its colonial past. Theories, the ideal of “city” and urbaneness are hence derived from a Euro-American urbanism and sociocultural context (Diouf and Fredericks 2014; Wesely and Allen 2019). In fact, planning practice in the region is associated with rationalist master planning approaches and inappropriate strategies, which are developed for other sociocultural and economic contexts, in dealing with actual urban problems (Watson 2014a; Cirolia and Berrisford 2017; Ewing 2021). In several occasions, urban planning and urban development interventions are associated with injustice and marginalisation of the poor (Watson 2011; Alemu 2015; McClelland 2018; Alem 2021).
In view of this, the research team, under the four-year research-cum training programme on Governance and Planning of Resilient Cities in East Africa (GOPLAREA), developed three key thematic areas for a series of events which have become the background of this book.
1.2 Key Thematic Areas of GOPLAREA Research Project
The main thematic areas developed under the GOPLAREA research project are localising planning theories, innovation of planning education and participatory and multi-governance planning approach. The research and discourse on these topics were structured by several questions, which guided the research and development of concepts for building public dialogue and co-production of knowledge.
-
Localising planning theories: What are the prospects of planning theory in the continent’s urban planning landscape, which actual issues are important to address the conceptual gaps in planning practice and education?
-
Innovating planning education to address the combined challenges of rapid urbanisation and climate change: How far have the curricula of urban planning education changed following the call for discourse on postcolonial planning theories and in particular the perspective from the south? Are there reforms on methods of knowledge acquisition and co-production? What were the impacts of increasing urban risks, and how have concepts such as sustainable development, urban resilience and risk adaptation? How have these influenced the teaching and training of planners?
-
Participatory and multi-level governance approach towards the combined challenges of rapid urbanisation and the impact of climate change: Challenges posed by rapid urbanisation and climate change-related risks have further exacerbated the weak institutional and financial deficits of cities in Africa. On the other hand, a considerable amount of resources are used in networks and initiatives in informal and pseudo formal systems. Among other things, these resources aim to address shortages of or inaccessible urban services, mitigation and adaptation to disaster-related risks. Some of the emerging questions are: What kind of resources are available and how best to deal with challenges in order to exploit opportunities of participatory and multi-levels governance approaches? How are resources at the local level mobilised and coordinated? How to coordinate and exploit such resources and make them effective for sustainable urban development and resilience building?
From 2016 to 2021, a series of workshops and a conference were organised by the research project. The workshops focused on discussions of critical issues of urban planning and the challenges of climate change impacts in East African cities. The aim of the workshops and conference was to create knowledge production platforms where researchers, practising planners and actors at the local and grassroots level could meet and discuss the burning issues in urban areas. In particular, the workshops facilitated to co-assessment, co-planning and administration needs of important planning and development agents. They also discussed issues, such as urban flood risks, ongoing initiatives of risk mapping and database building, nature-based solutions which could make African cities resilient, participatory management of urban river valleys and flooding and capacity building for resilient risk and urban management.
An international forum, which was organised as the fifth conference of AAPS (Association of African Planning Schools), brought together scholars from several countries in Africa and as well as international scholars. The conference had several parallel and plenary sessions, which facilitated opening the dialogue to a wide range of participants. More than 70 papers were presented and discussed in the three-day event. However, it is not the ambition of this book to summarise all the discussion of the papers presented and the keynote speeches, but to present a selection of topics, which provide a glimpse into the discussed topics in planning theory and education as well as current issues of urban governance and risk management.
1.3 Book Chapters and Key Thematic Areas
The book is organised in 11 chapters including the introduction. The chapters are organised in three thematic groups: Planning theories and models—application and local challenges; the state of planning education and planning capacity and; participatory and multi-level governance approach towards current urban challenges. The chapters cover several issues in climate change impact adaptation, participatory planning, co-production of services, housing and planning education. Implications of Euro-American centred planning models, concepts and theories are also critically assessed, as well as the prospects for contextualisation and local perspectives of urban challenges.
In Part I, Lia Gebremariam Woldetsadik, Wafae Boullala and Raffael Beier, the authors question, in different ways, the application of imported planning theories, models and concepts. They have sought to highlight the implication of theories and concepts that draw ideals from foreign sociocultural and economic contexts and experiences. Woldestadik, taking the case of neighbourhood upgrading initiatives in Addis Ababa, discusses the application of collaborative planning and how it is affected by government systems. She notes that democratic culture, trust and cooperative norms are linked to government systems shaping the planning process and cooperation. Hence, the state, in dominantly authoritarian regimes, penetrates the society and shaping social norms and the worldview of actors. She argues that the collaborative planning process should be designed taking into consideration contextualised state-society relationships. Wafae Boullala, in Chap. 3, thematises the issue of street vending and the modernist view of “informality” using historical research in Rabat. She notes that imported planning models have led to the marginalisation of people, who, as peddlers, were part of a centuries-old tradition of the “Souk.” Boullala argues that street vending is an economic activity linked to the historical development of Rabat, which has been pushed out of the downtown by colonial planning models and urban policies. In her view, street vending is a form of resistance against alien policies and urban forms; and a struggle to claim back urban spaces. Raffael Beier, in his chapter titled “Revisiting Stokes Theory of Slums,” discusses the concept of the slum and its implications in the development of large-scale housing programmes. Using cases of different housing programmes in various African countries, he analyses the conceptual underpinning behind adequate housing. Beier notes of the implications of conceptualisation that neglects social capital embedded in the communities living in informal settlements and the social entrepreneurship in self-help housing development. He argues that concepts such as “slums” are developed from colonial planning and mostly concerned with the notion of shelter. Hence, he calls for a contextualised concept of adequate housing which goes beyond material decency.
The chapters in Part II discuss the state of planning education and planning capacity in different planning systems in Africa. Chapters 5 and 6 discuss the education and training of planners, analysing the content of course modules. Geetika Anand and Nadini Dutta, Chap. 5, and Abraham Matamanda, Jennilee Kohima, Veran Nel and Innocent Chirisa, Chap. 6, present assessments of planning education curricula and how planners are trained and equipped to deal with contemporaneous urban challenges. Geetika Anand and Nadini Dutta present us a comparative study of different planning curricula in ten universities in Africa and Asia. The chapter is also a reflection on the state of planning education in a postcolonial context. The authors note that the reviewed planning curricula exhibit a dependency on education philosophy, pedagogy and literature, which are mainly derived from Euro-American experiences. In addition, current issues, such as informality, access to land, sustainability and justice remain either on the periphery or at a very abstract level. Abraham Matamanda et al., also review curricula, but focus on to what extent knowledge of the implications of climate change and adaptation are taught in planning schools of South Africa, Zimbabwe and Namibia. The authors argue that the contents show acknowledgement of the impacts of climate change, but it fails to include teaching module which deal with contextualised challenges, such as flooding and draught.
In contrast, Wilbard Kombe and Samwel Alananga and Dawah Magembe-Mushi and Ramadhan Matingas, analyse the capacity and skills of planners and officials on the ground. The authors assess the capacity and skills of planners and officials of local authorities in managing planning processes and understanding issues related to climate change. Kombe and Alananga, Chap. 7, discuss the link between the knowledge that planning professionals have and the achieved urban resilience in Tanzania. Assessing the case of Arusha Municipality in Tanzania, they observe the capacity gaps related to the training and education of professional planners. The authors argue that education and awareness on climate change impacts are key pillars to meet the aims of climate change-related policies at local level. Magembe-Mushi and Matingas, Chap. 8, take the case of sea level rise in the Pangani Divison, in Tanzania, and assess the role of authorities in working with the community and implementing localised adaptive measures. The authors underscore the role of capacity building to equip local authorities with adequate leadership quality and skills in managing initiatives in climate change adaptation and mitigation. In addition, a conducive information sharing environment and efficient resource mobilisation contribute to community resilience building.
In Part III, three chapters discuss the landscapes of participatory planning and multi-level governance using the cases of planning process in Bahir Dar, in Ethiopia and co-production of urban spaces in Maputo, in Mozambique, and infrastructure in Wa, in Ghana. In Chap. 9, Behailu Melesse Digafe, Achamyeleh Gashu Adam, Gebeyehu Belay Shibeshi and Mengiste Abate Meshesha present the process through which the Structure Plan of Bahir Dar, in Ethiopia, was prepared. The authors underline a conflict emerging from combining participatory planning process with the top-down planning, i.e. pre-set planning standards. They argue that stakeholder participation and acceptance of plans by the community could be improved if planning standards were flexible and limited to a general framework guiding the participatory planning process. The authors call for due attention to communal interests and local priorities, while making information on important planning requirements available to the communities and stakeholders in general.
Milousa Ibraimo António, Chap. 10, and Francis Dakyaga, Chap. 11, bring the issue of participatory and multi-level governance to the fore. António examines self-production practices within the context of the production of collective spaces. Using the concept of alternative informality, she discusses how the incremental housing construction at the household level is linked to community level informal land administration practices. Using the case of a neighbourhood at the periphery of Maputo, she notes the interplay of different levels of governance with informal ones at the grassroots level. The chapter underlines that there is a wide consensus that makes local leaders, informal actors of land governance, responsible for managing and guiding the production of collective spaces. In Chap. 11, Dakyaga discusses post settlement planning and development of infrastructure for clean water supply. Using the networked city concept, the chapter explores the co-production of infrastructure and management of clean water supply systems in different level of governance. He notes that the heterogeneity of supply models is essential to support the effort towards universal water access. Dakyaga argues that collaboration among the different types of actors is decisive for filling the institutional gap in supplying basic services.
References
Addaney M, Boshoff E, Olutola B (2017) The climate change and human rights nexus in Africa. Amsterdam Law Forum 9(3):5. https://doi.org/10.37974/ALF.304
Addaney M, Cobbinah PB (2019) Climate change, urban planning and sustainable development in africa: the difference worth appreciating. In: Cobbinah PB, Addaney M (eds) The geography of climate change adaptation in urban Africa. Springer, Cham, pp 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04873-0_1
Alem G (2021) Urban plans and conflicting interests in sustainable cross-boundary land governance, the case of national urban and regional plans in Ethiopia. Sustain 13(6):3081. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063081
Alem G, Namangaya AH (2021) ‘Households’ and community initiatives towards city resilience: the case of flood resilience in Dar es Salaam. In Faldi G, Fisher A, Moretto L (eds) African cities through local eyes: experiments in place-based planning and design. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84906-1. Accessed 14 Jan 2022
Alemu GTe (2015) Land expropriation and compensation payment in Ethiopia. Review 6(13):93–97
Biesbroek R et al (2022) Policy attention to climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: a global assessment of national communications (1994–2019). Clim Policy 22(1):97–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.2018986
Blanco H et al (2009) Shaken, shrinking, hot, impoverished and informal: emerging research agendas in planning. Prog Plan 72(4):195–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2009.09.001
Cain A (2014) African urban fantasies: past lessons and emerging realities. Environ Urban 26(2):561–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247814526544
Cirolia LR, Berrisford S (2017) “Negotiated planning”: diverse trajectories of implementation in Nairobi, Addis Ababa, and Harare. Habitat Int 59: 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.11.005
Cobbinah PB, Poku-Boansi M, Peprah C (2017) Urban environmental problems in Ghana. Environ Dev 23:33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2017.05.001
Comaroff J, Comaroff JL (2012) Theory from the south: or, how Euro-America is evolving toward Africa. Anthropol Forum 22(2):113–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2012.694169
Connell R (2014) Using southern theory: decolonizing social thought in theory, research and application. Plan Theory 13(2):210–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213499216
CRED, UNDRR (2020) Human cost of disasters: an overview of the last 20 years, 2000–2019. UNDRR, p. 30. Available at: https://www.preventionweb.net/files/74124_humancostofdisasters20002019reportu.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2021
De Satgé R, Watson V (2018) Urban planning in the global south: conflicting rationalities in contested urban space. Springer, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69496-2. Accessed 1 Nov 2020
Diouf M, Fredericks R (2014) Introduction: decolonizing urban theory. In Diouf M, Fredericks R (eds) The arts of citizenship in African cities. Palgrave Macmillan US, New York, pp 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137481887
Ewing K (2021) Spaces of transformative practice: co-producing, (re)making and translating fractional urban space in Gugulethu, Cape Town. Urban Forum 32(4):395–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-021-09436-6
Fourchard L (2011) Between world history and state formation: new perspectives on Africa’s cities. J Afr Hist 52(2):223–248. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23017677. Accessed: 2 July 2020
Greiving S, Du J, Puntub W (2018) Managed retreat—A strategy for the mitigation of disaster risks with international and comparative perspectives. J Extreme Events 5(2/3):1850011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737618500112
McClelland J (2018) Planners and the work of renewal in Addis Ababa: developmental state, urbanizing society. PhD. University of Washington. Available at: https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/41805/McClelland_washington_0250E_18306.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 29 Jan 2021
Myers GA (2011) African cities: alternative visions of urban theory and practice.Zed Books Ltd., London and New York
Parnell S, Walawege R (2011) Sub-Saharan African urbanisation and global environmental change. Glob Environ Chang 21:S12–S20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.014
Robinson J (2006) Ordinary cities: between modernity and development.Routledge (Questioning cities), London and New York
Robinson J (2011) Cities in a world of cities: the comparative gesture: cities in a world of cities compared. Int J Urban Reg Res 35(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00982.x
Simone A (2004) People as infrastructure: intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Publ Cult 16(3):407–429. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-16-3-407
Simone A (2010) City life from Jakarta to Dakar: movements at the crossroads. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892497
UN-Habitat (2016) Urbanization and development: emerging futures. UN-Habitat (World cities report, 2016), Nairobi, Kenya
UN-HABITAT (2017) New urban agenda: Habitat III: Quito 17–20 October 2016. United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development. United Nations, Nairobi
United Nation (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
Watson V (2009) Seeing from the south: refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Stud 46(11):2259–2275
Watson V (2011) Changing planning law in Africa: an introduction to the issue. Urban Forum 22(3):203–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-011-9118-9
Watson V (2014a) African urban fantasies: dreams or nightmares? Environ Urban 26(1):215–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247813513705
Watson V (2014b) Co-production and collaboration in planning—The difference. Plan Theory Pract 15(1):62–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2013.866266
Wesely J, Allen A (2019) De-Colonising planning education? Exploring the geographies of urban planning education networks. Urban Plan 4(4):139–151. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i4.2200
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alem Gebregiorgis, G., Namangaya, A.H., Greiving, S., Kombe, W.J. (2022). Planning Cities in Africa—Current Issues and Future Prospects of Urban Governance and Planning: An Introduction. In: Alem Gebregiorgis, G., Greiving, S., Namangaya, A.H., Kombe, W.J. (eds) Planning Cities in Africa. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06550-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06550-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06549-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06550-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)