Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Odyssea" differant

← Differentia superior Differentia proxima →

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Emendatio ex 23:43, 1 Decembris 2006

Ritchie's Fabulae Faciles

Dear LeighvsOptimvsMaximvs, you specified that your additions to this article incorporate material from "Ritchie's Fabulae Faciles". Is that a free source or is it that old that copyright has expired? If no, I'm afraid we cannot keep it here in our encyclopaedia libera.

If it indeed is free of copyright, maybe Vicifons would be a better place for longer passages taken from this book?

Greetings, --UV 00:32, 30 Novembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am pretty sure that the copyright has expired. It is on project Gutenburg, and there are sections from it in other Latin Wikipedia articles e.g. Hercules. LeighvsOptimvsMaximvs 08:00, 30 Novembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! If it's on Project Gutenberg, then we can be pretty sure that it is safe to use. Greetings, --UV 22:57, 1 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still remains the issue of whether or not longer passages should be at vicifons or not. I vote they should be.--Ioshus ^(disp) 23:43, 1 Decembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Linea 7: / Linea 7: @@
 Greetings, --[[Usor:UV|UV]] 00:32, 30 Novembris 2006 (UTC)
-I am pretty sure that the copyright has expired. It is on project Gutenburg, and there are sections from it in other Latin Wikipedia articles e.g. [[Hercules]]. [[Usor:LeighvsOptimvsMaximvs|LeighvsOptimvsMaximvs]] 08:00, 30 Novembris 2006 (UTC)
+:I am pretty sure that the copyright has expired. It is on project Gutenburg, and there are sections from it in other Latin Wikipedia articles e.g. [[Hercules]]. [[Usor:LeighvsOptimvsMaximvs|LeighvsOptimvsMaximvs]] 08:00, 30 Novembris 2006 (UTC)
-: Thanks! If it's on Project Gutenberg, then we can be pretty sure that it is safe to use. Greetings, --[[Usor:UV|UV]] 22:57, 1 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
+:: Thanks! If it's on Project Gutenberg, then we can be pretty sure that it is safe to use. Greetings, --[[Usor:UV|UV]] 22:57, 1 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
+:::Still remains the issue of whether or not longer passages should be at vicifons or not. I vote they should be.--[[Usor:Ioshus Rocchio|Ioshus]] <small><sup>[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioshus Rocchio|(disp)]]</sup></small> 23:43, 1 Decembris 2006 (UTC)