Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---

+ Andere Auflagen/Ausgaben
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Mostafizur Rahman, A. S. M. [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Globalization and transformation
Titelzusatz:state, ideas, and economic policy in Bangladesh
Mitwirkende:Mukherji, Rahul [AkademischeR BetreuerIn]   i
Verf.angabe:vorglegt von A.S.M. Mostafizur Rahman ; first supervisor and examainer: Prof. Dr. Rahul Mukherji [und weitere Gutachter]
Verlagsort:Heidelberg
E-Jahr:2024
Jahr:07 Mrz. 2024
Umfang:1 Online-Ressource (269 Seiten)
Illustrationen:Illustrationen, Diagramme
Hochschulschrift:Dissertation, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, 2024
Abstract:Understanding the policymaking process in an emerging economy in the global south, such as Bangladesh, holds significant importance. The country's remarkable socio-economic development, once the most impoverished in the region, has been facilitated by post-globalization economic transformation. While the literature on institutional change has predominantly focused on states in industrialist countries, this dissertation presents an innovative theoretical approach. It deeply explores primary case materials to illustrate how the state engages in policy evolution in a developing country's gradual shift from the import substitution model towards globalization and deregulation. The central argument posited is that Bangladesh's globalization, particularly through its private sector-led garment exports, stands as a significant success story. Bangladesh is now the world's second-largest garment exporter after China. This achievement is attributed to the entrepreneurial development it fosters and its role in driving socio-economic change. Moreover, it has enabled the mobilization of resources, reducing aid dependence, enhancing climate resilience, improving public health and wellbeing, empowering women, and addressing critical needs in physical infrastructure and human development. The argument presented here diverges from the conventional explanation found in the literature, which tends to emphasize the role of external forces, particularly institutions like the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and donors, in triggering policy reforms in Bangladesh. These reforms, commonly linked with structural adjustment packages implemented during the balance of payments crisis, are frequently perceived as predominantly influenced by external pressures. Additionally, the influence of the business class or Bangladeshi non-governmental organizations (NGOs) is often asserted. This dissertation proposes an alternative explanation by suggesting that ideational viewpoints within the state, specifically the ideas espoused by top technocrats and political executives, played a significant role. It argues that these internal ideational factors were more influential than materialistic ones, highlighting the causal role of the policy process driven by endogenous imperatives. The introduction of the dissertation addresses the research problem and research puzzle while suggesting conjectures after problematizing existing arguments. The significant economic transformation observed in Bangladesh today is portrayed as the outcome of a gradual process spanning several decades. The transition towards promoting the private sector and embracing globalization commenced in 1991, following a series of incremental changes dating back to the 1970s and 1980s. During these periods, the institutional path progressed towards empowering the private sector and embracing globalization, laying the groundwork for a trajectory led by the private sector in the context of globalization. The theory chapter serves to establish the conceptual and theoretical foundation for analyzing both economic change and transformation by examining the evolutionary nature of the process. The study adopts an institutional change framework, drawing on the theory of gradual change and focusing on concepts such as layering and tipping points. Within this framework, causal variables such as powering and puzzling, social learning, and ideas are identified. The methodological approach is grounded in historical institutionalism, employing the process-tracing "within case" method. The selection of cases deliberately targets an important yet under-researched area—the policy process in Bangladesh concerning the success of garment-led industrialization. This dissertation fills a noticeable gap in the literature through rigorous analysis, enabling an in-depth exploration of the institutional dynamics spanning four governments from 1972 to 1991. The study relies on substantial primary materials, including interviews with key officials. Each empirical chapter not only presents data but also connects the findings to conceptual and theoretical conjectures, underscoring the significant contributions of this research. The key causal variables identified include the concepts of ‘puzzling’ and ‘social learning’ within the state capacity framework, along with a narrowly defined and developed concept of a "policy committee." The learning process entails technocrats engaging in what Hugh Heclo and Peter Hall term as "social learning," where they play a crucial role in addressing policy challenges, particularly during times of uncertainty and political turmoil, based on their learning from past experiences. Additionally, the concept of ‘powering’ is highlighted, emphasizing that while technocrats provide policy recommendations, it is ultimately the political executive who endorses policies. The interplay between ‘puzzling and powering’ and ‘social learning’ shapes the outcomes of the policy process. The first empirical chapter focusing on the Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Government (1972-1975) illustrates the emergence of policy learning during this period. Initially, this government pursued import substitution under strict government controls, with a predominant public sector. The historical context of exploitation under Pakistani rule and the centralization of industry by West Pakistan fostered socialism as an ideal for East Pakistan's economic emancipation. Additionally, close ties with India and the Soviet Union reinforced this socialist tendency. However, due to severe economic conditions resulting from stringent control on private investment and emphasis on large-scale public investment, policy puzzling and learning ensued. As a result, incremental changes were initiated, allowing limited private sector participation. The second empirical chapter explores the General Ziaur Rahman government's tenure (1975-1981) and how deregulation was consolidated within a layering step, paving the way for a shift towards globalization. General Zia and his technocrats, operating under authoritarian conditions, acknowledged the inefficacy of existing policies. Furthermore, General Zia's inclination towards the West fostered closer collaboration with donors. The Multifiber Agreement (MFA) presented an opportunity for garments, coinciding with the decline in jute exports. This government opened up industrial sectors for private participation, and banks provided funding across various sectors, with special emphasis on the burgeoning garment industry. The chapter also explores the origins of the garment industry during this period. Notably, Noorul Quader Khan, upon retiring as cabinet secretary, collaborated with a Korean multinational, Daewoo, with the support of General Zia, leading to the establishment of Desh Garments—a pioneering venture that catalyzed the export orientation of the sector. The third empirical chapter delves into the economic policies of the General Hussain Muhammad Ershad Government (1982-1990), highlighting its emphasis on greater private sector involvement. Under this administration, there was a political inclination towards globalization and deregulation, leading to the appointment of technocrats aligned with this vision. The leadership believed that promoting the private sector would be more effective in job creation. Despite facing significant political opposition, efforts towards disinvestment were made, eventually resulting in compromises like public-private partnerships. The decentralization of administration and restructuring of ministries aimed at promoting industrialization and economic globalization driven by the private sector at the regional level. Initiatives such as the Industrial Promotion and Development Company, with support from organizations like the International Finance Corporation, aimed to boost the private sector. Efforts towards globalization were synchronized with the establishment of an export processing zone in Chittagong, focusing on promoting private and foreign investment. Foreign investment promotion was encouraged through diplomatic efforts and legislative measures to safeguard investors. Currency devaluation was utilized to stimulate exports, along with some degree of import liberalization. The chapter convincingly argues that the groundwork for globalization, initiated under General Zia, came to fruition under General Ershad. The final empirical chapter contends that the system shifted towards globalization and deregulation in 1991. Although a severe balance of payments crisis occurred in 1989, it wasn't perceived as the sole cause of the industrial policy of 1991. The democratic uprising in 1990 led to the downfall of the military-backed government and the rise of a democratic government. The chapter argues that while economic and political changes may have been intertwined, the economic shift in 1991 was primarily driven by ideas within the state and driven by endogenous imperati...
DOI:doi:10.11588/heidok.00034481
URL:kostenfrei: Resolving-System: https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-344816
 kostenfrei: Resolving-System: http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00034481
 kostenfrei: Volltext: http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/34481
 kostenfrei: Resolving-System: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-344816
 kostenfrei: Langzeitarchivierung Nationalbibliothek: https://d-nb.info/132282388X/34
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00034481
URN:urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-344816
Schlagwörter:(k)Technocrats   i / (s)Wirtschaftspolitik   i / (s)Wirtschaftsentwicklung   i / (s)Sozialer Wandel   i / (s)Entwicklung   i / (s)Institutionalismus   i / (s)Historischer Institutionalismus   i / (s)Staat   i / (s)Soziales Lernen   i / (g)Globaler Süden   i / (g)Bangladesch   i
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Dokumenttyp:Hochschulschrift
Sprache:eng
Bibliogr. Hinweis:Erscheint auch als : Druck-Ausgabe: Mostafizur Rahman, A. S. M., 1981 - : Globalization and transformation. - Heidelberg, 2024. - 269 Seiten
Sach-SW:Institutional Change
 Tipping Point
 Layering
 Economic Transformation
 Politik
 Developing Country
 Gradual Change
 Path Dependence
 Garment Industry
 Global Chain
 Global Competitive Advantage
 Business and Politics
 Powering
 Puzzling
 Policy Process
 Policy Learning
 Causal Variable
 Process Tracing
 Within Case
K10plus-PPN:1884057497
 
 
Lokale URL UB: Zum Volltext

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69194363   QR-Code

zum Seitenanfang