Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Michaeli, Daniel [VerfasserIn]   i
 Michaeli, Christoph T. [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Cancer drug prices in the United States
Titelzusatz:efficacy, innovation, clinical trial evidence, and epidemiology
Verf.angabe:Daniel Tobias Michaeli, MSc, Thomas Michaeli, MD, MSc
E-Jahr:2023
Jahr:November 2023
Umfang:11 S.
Fussnoten:Online verfügbar 28 July 2023, Version des Artikels 27 October 2023 ; Gesehen am 18.01.2024
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Value in health
Ort Quelle:Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1998
Jahr Quelle:2023
Band/Heft Quelle:26(2023), 11 vom: Nov., Seite 1590-1600
ISSN Quelle:1524-4733
Abstract:Objectives - Rising cancer drug prices challenge patients and healthcare systems. Although prices are routinely assigned to original drug indications receiving US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, the pricing of supplemental indication approvals remains uncertain. This study identifies and quantifies factors associated with cancer drug prices, distinctly analyzing original and supplemental indications. - Methods - Clinical trial evidence and epidemiologic data supporting new indications’ FDA approval (2003-2022) were collected from the DrugsFDA database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Global Burden of Disease study. Indication-specific monthly treatment costs were calculated for Medicare patients. The association between log-prices and collected variables were assessed in regression analyses. - Results - We identified 145 drugs approved across 373 cancer indications. Drugs were priced at $24 444 per month on average (median = $16 013). For original indications, prices weakly correlated to improvements in overall survival (β = 0.28, P = .037) and progression-free survival (β = 0.16, P = .001). Original indications’ prices were as follows: (1) negatively associated with disease incidence (β = −0.21, P < .001) and prevalence; (2) positively correlated with first-in-class drugs (26%, P = .057), gene and cell therapies (176%, P < .001), hematologic cancers (62%, P < .001), and severe diseases with substantial unmet needs (6% per disability-adjusted life-year, P < .001); and (3) negatively correlated to indications with randomized-controlled phase 3 trials. Prices were poorly associated with supplemental indications’ efficacy, clinical evidence, and epidemiology. - Conclusions - Cancer drug prices are set based on the original indication’s characteristics, thereby omitting the value of supplemental indications. Indication-specific pricing, coverage, and reimbursement policies considering each indication’s safety, efficacy, innovativeness, and unmet needs are necessary to align a drug’s value and price.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.jval.2023.06.020
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.06.020
 Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301523030656
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.06.020
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:cancer drugs
 clinical trials
 disability-adjusted life-year
 drug development
 drug prices
 indication-specific pricing
 multiple indications
 overall survival
 progression-free survival
 unmet needs
 value-based pricing
K10plus-PPN:1878403540
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69162907   QR-Code

zum Seitenanfang