Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---

+ Andere Auflagen/Ausgaben
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:O'Mahoney, Joseph [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Denying the Spoils of War
Titelzusatz:The Politics of Invasion and Non-recognition
Verf.angabe:Joseph O'Mahoney
Verlagsort:Edinburgh
Verlag:Edinburgh University Press
E-Jahr:2022
Jahr:[2022]
Umfang:1 Online-Ressource (240 p.)
Schrift/Sprache:In English
Ang. zum Inhalt:Frontmatter
 Contents
 List of figures and tables
 Acknowledgements
 List of acronyms and abbreviations
 Introduction
 Chapter One. Rule maintenance: the logic of symbolic sanctions
 Chapter Two. The Manchurian Crisis
 Chapter Three. The Abyssinian Crisis
 Chapter Four. Turkey, Cyprus and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus
 Chapter Five. The independence of Bangladesh
 Chapter Six. The uncertain fruits of victory: variation in nonrecognition
 Conclusion
 Bibliography
 Index
ISBN:978-1-4744-3444-7
Abstract:Why do so many states adopt a position of non-recognition of gains from war?Despite being proven ineffective as a coercive tool or deterrent, the international community has actively withheld recognition in numerous instances of territorial conquest since the 1930s. Joseph O'Mahoney systematically analyses 21 case studies – including the Manchurian Crisis, the Turkish invasion of Cyprus and Russia’s annexation of Crimea – to explore why so many states have adopted a policy of non-recognition of the spoils of war. By drawing on historical sources including recently declassified archival documents, he evaluates states’ decision-making. He develops a new theory for non-recognition as a symbolic sanction aimed at reproducing common knowledge of the rules of international behaviour.Key FeaturesChapter-length case studies of two major instances of non-recognition: the Japanese conquest of Manchuria and the establishment of Manchukuo in the 1930s, and the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974 and the subsequent declaration of the Turkish Republic of Northern CyprusIncludes discussion of cases including Russia’s annexation of CrimeaCompares non-recognised cases with two cases where force was used but the results were recognised as legitimate: the Italian conquest of Abyssinia (Ethiopia) in 1935 and the Indian invasion of East Pakistan and the creation of Bangladesh in 1971Challenges conventional IR theory that symbolic sanctions are either failed attempts at coercion or mere posturing for domestic audiencesElucidates a model of rule maintenance, combining rationalist and constructivist insights, which could be applied to other fields in international politics
DOI:doi:10.1515/9781474434447
URL:kostenfrei: Resolving-System: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474434447
 kostenfrei: Verlag: https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781474434447
 Cover: https://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781474434447/original
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474434447
Schlagwörter:(s)Gebietserwerb   i / (s)Geschichte   i / (s)Handlung   i / (s)Völkerrecht   i / (s)Internationale Politik   i / (s)Auswirkung   i / (s)Fallstudie   i / (s)Anerkennung   i / (s)Invasion   i / (s)Annexion   i / (s)Sanktion   i / (s)Internationaler Konflikt   i / (s)Rechtsverletzung   i
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Bibliogr. Hinweis:Erscheint auch als : print
Sach-SW:Politics
 LAW / International
K10plus-PPN:1800724950
 
 
Lokale URL UB: Zum Volltext

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69136005   QR-Code

zum Seitenanfang