Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Roldán-Majewski, Carolina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Broedel, Elias [VerfasserIn]   i
 von Korff, Michael [VerfasserIn]   i
 Rammelsberg, Peter [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schindler, Hans J. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Giannakopoulos, Nikolaos Nikitas [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Diagnostic accuracy of the Pain (P), Enjoyment (E), and General activity (G) scale, a three-item questionnaire, for grading the impact of orofacial pain-related dysfunction
Verf.angabe:Carolina Roldán-Majewski, Elias Broedel, Michael von Korff, Peter Rammelsberg, Hans Jürgen Schindler, Nikolaos Nikitas Giannakopoulos
E-Jahr:2022
Jahr:April 2022
Umfang:7 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 13.12.2022
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Pain
Ort Quelle:New York, NY [u.a.] : Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1975
Jahr Quelle:2022
Band/Heft Quelle:163(2022), 4, Seite e540-e546
ISSN Quelle:1872-6623
Abstract:Purpose of this study was to examine the discriminative properties of the 3-item Pain (P), Enjoyment (E), and General activity (G) (PEG) questionnaire for grading impact of nondental orofacial pain. Two hundred eighty-six consecutive patients with orofacial pain of nondental origin filled out the PEG questionnaire and Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS, version 2), Correlation between the PEG and GCPS scores, internal consistency of the PEG, and differences between groups were examined statistically (level of significance: P <= 0.05). The mean (+/- SD) age of the 213 patients (158 female) who were included in the analysis was 43.1 (+/- 16.7) years. Of the sample, 48.8% (n = 104) had some degree of orofacial pain-related disability (mean overall characteristic pain intensity: 51.2 +/- 23.2, average overall PEG score: 4.3 +/- 2.7, and average PHQ-9 score: 8.2 +/- 6.5). No significant differences were found between the sexes for any score. The number of disability points (GCPS) and overall PEG score showed a strong and positive correlation (Spearman rho = 0.77, P < 0.001). The internal consistency of the PEG questionnaire was high (Cronbach alpha = 0.86). Assuming 3 different levels of orofacial pain-related disability (mild, moderate, and severe), we obtained overall accuracy of 69.01%, with high specificity for mild and severe cases. The 3 PEG groups (mild, moderate, or severe) differed from each other significantly regarding their clinical grading according to the GCPS (Kruskal-Wallis, P < 0.001). Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve showed that a single cutoff value of 3.8 points in the PEG score yields adequate validity (sensitivity = 0.91 and specificity = 0.78). The proposed 2 cutoff points (upper = 7 and lower = 4) yield low sensitivity for the upper threshold. The 3-item PEG questionnaire is suitable for grading impact of nondental orofacial pain.
DOI:doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002406
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002406
 Volltext: https://journals.lww.com/pain/Fulltext/2022/04000/Diagnostic_accuracy_of_the_Pain__P_,_Enjoyment.24.aspx
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002406
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Chronification
 Craniomandibular disorders
 criteria
 depression
 disability
 disorders-axis-ii
 inventory
 Orofacial Pain
 population
 prevalence
 randomized clinical-trial
 Screening
 severity
 temporomandibular disorders
K10plus-PPN:1826860142
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68996522   QR-Code

zum Seitenanfang