Status: Bibliographieeintrag
Standort: ---
Exemplare:
---
| |  Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Verfasst von: | Said, Nadia [VerfasserIn]  |
|---|
| | Fischer, Helen [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Titel: | Extrapolation accuracy underestimates rule learning |
|---|
| Titelzusatz: | evidence from the function-learning paradigm |
|---|
| Verf.angabe: | Nadia Said, Helen Fischer |
|---|
| E-Jahr: | 2021 |
|---|
| Jahr: | 25 June 2021 |
|---|
| Umfang: | 20 S. |
|---|
| Teil: | volume:218 |
|---|
| | year:2021 |
|---|
| | month:07 |
|---|
| | elocationid:103356 |
|---|
| | pages:1-20 |
|---|
| | extent:20 |
|---|
| Fussnoten: | Gesehen am 23.09.2021 |
|---|
| Titel Quelle: | Enthalten in: Acta psychologica |
|---|
| Ort Quelle: | Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1936 |
|---|
| Jahr Quelle: | 2021 |
|---|
| Band/Heft Quelle: | 218(2021) vom: Juli, Artikel-ID 103356, Seite 1-20 |
|---|
| ISSN Quelle: | 1873-6297 |
|---|
| Abstract: | Understanding the development of non-linear processes such as economic or population growth is an important prerequisite for informed decisions in those areas. In the function-learning paradigm, people's understanding of the function rule that underlies the to-be predicted process is typically measured by means of extrapolation accuracy. Here we argue, however, that even though accurate extrapolation necessitates rule-learning, the reverse does not necessarily hold: Inaccurate extrapolation does not exclude rule-learning. Experiment 1 shows that more than one third of participants who would be classified as “exemplar-based learners” based on their extrapolation accuracy were able to identify the correct function shape and slope in a rule-selection paradigm, demonstrating accurate understanding of the function rule. Experiment 2 shows that higher proportions of rule learning than ruleapplication in the function-learning paradigm is not due to (i) higher a priori probabilities to guess the correct rule in the rule-selection paradigm; nor is it due to (ii) a lack of simultaneous access to all function values in the function-learning paradigm. We conclude that rule application is not tantamount to rule-learning, and that assessing rule xlearning via extrapolation accuracy underestimates the proportion of rule learners in function-learning experiments. |
|---|
| DOI: | doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103356 |
|---|
| URL: | Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.
Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103356 |
|---|
| | Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691821001062 |
|---|
| | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103356 |
|---|
| Datenträger: | Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Sprache: | eng |
|---|
| Sach-SW: | Function-learning |
|---|
| | Non-linear processes |
|---|
| | Rule-based vs exemplar-based learners |
|---|
| | Understanding |
|---|
| K10plus-PPN: | 1771732644 |
|---|
| Verknüpfungen: | → Zeitschrift |
|---|
Extrapolation accuracy underestimates rule learning / Said, Nadia [VerfasserIn]; 25 June 2021 (Online-Ressource)
68782831
Zurück zur Trefferübersicht und Suche
