Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Geyer, Thomas [VerfasserIn]   i
 Rübenthaler, Johannes [VerfasserIn]   i
 Marschner, Constantin [VerfasserIn]   i
 von Hake, Malte [VerfasserIn]   i
 Fabritius, Matthias P. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Froelich, Matthias F. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Huber, Thomas [VerfasserIn]   i
 Nörenberg, Dominik [VerfasserIn]   i
 Rückel, Johannes [VerfasserIn]   i
 Weniger, Maximilian [VerfasserIn]   i
 Martens, Corinna [VerfasserIn]   i
 Sabel, Laura [VerfasserIn]   i
 Clevert, Dirk-André [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schwarze, Vincent [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Structured reporting using CEUS LI-RADS for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Titelzusatz:impact and advantages on report integrity, quality and interdisciplinary communication
Verf.angabe:Thomas Geyer, Johannes Rübenthaler, Constantin Marschner, Malte von Hake, Matthias P. Fabritius, Matthias F. Froelich, Thomas Huber, Dominik Nörenberg, Johannes Rückel, Maximilian Weniger, Corinna Martens, Laura Sabel, Dirk-André Clevert and Vincent Schwarze
E-Jahr:2021
Jahr:31 January 2021
Umfang:13 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 29.04.2021
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Cancers
Ort Quelle:Basel : MDPI, 2009
Jahr Quelle:2021
Band/Heft Quelle:13(2021), 3, Artikel-ID 534, Seite 1-13
ISSN Quelle:2072-6694
Abstract:Background: Our retrospective single-center study aims to evaluate the impact of structured reporting (SR) using a CEUS LI-RADS template on report quality compared to conventional free-text reporting (FTR) in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: We included 50 patients who underwent CEUS for HCC staging. FTR created after these examinations were compared to SR retrospectively generated by using template-based online software with clickable decision trees. The reports were evaluated regarding report completeness, information extraction, linguistic quality and overall report quality by two readers specialized in internal medicine and visceral surgery. Results: SR significantly increased report completeness with at least one key feature missing in 31% of FTR vs. 2% of SR (p < 0.001). Information extraction was considered easy in 98% of SR vs. 86% of FTR (p = 0.004). The trust of referring physicians in the report was significantly increased by SR with a mean of 5.68 for SR vs. 4.96 for FTR (p < 0.001). SR received significantly higher ratings regarding linguistic quality (5.79 for SR vs. 4.83 for FTR (p < 0.001)) and overall report quality (5.75 for SR vs. 5.01 for FTR (p < 0.001)). Conclusions: Using SR instead of conventional FTR increases the overall quality of reports in CEUS examinations of HCC patients and may represent a valuable tool to facilitate clinical decision-making and improve interdisciplinary communication in the future.
DOI:doi:10.3390/cancers13030534
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13030534
 Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/3/534
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13030534
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:CEUS
 clinical decision-making
 contrast-enhanced ultrasound
 hepatocellular carcinoma
 structured reporting
K10plus-PPN:1756573549
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68730402   QR-Code

zum Seitenanfang