| Verfasst von: | Sandler, Daniela [VerfasserIn]  |
|---|
| Titel: | Counterpreservation |
|---|
| Titelzusatz: | architectural decay in Berlin since 1989 |
|---|
| Verf.angabe: | Daniela Sandler |
|---|
| Verlagsort: | Ithaca, NY ; London |
|---|
| Verlag: | Cornell University Press and Cornell University Library |
|---|
| E-Jahr: | 2016 |
|---|
| Jahr: | [2016] |
|---|
| Umfang: | xv, 255 Seiten |
|---|
| Illustrationen: | Illustrationen |
|---|
| Gesamttitel/Reihe: | Signale: Modern German letters, cultures, and thought |
|---|
| | A Signale book |
|---|
| Fussnoten: | Includes index ; A Signale book |
|---|
| ISBN: | 978-1-5017-0317-1 |
|---|
| | 978-1-5017-0316-4 |
|---|
| | 978-1-5017-0316-4 |
|---|
| | 978-1-5017-0317-1 |
|---|
| Abstract: | "In Berlin, decrepit structures do not always denote urban blight. Decayed buildings are incorporated into everyday life as residences, exhibition spaces, shops, offices, and as leisure space. As nodes of public dialogue, they serve as platforms for dissenting views about the future and past of Berlin. In this book, Daniela Sandler introduces the concept of counterpreservation as a way to understand this intentional appropriation of decrepitude. The embrace of decay is a sign of Berlin's iconoclastic rebelliousness, but it has also been incorporated into the mainstream economy of tourism and development as part of the city's countercultural cachet. Sandler presents the possibilities and shortcomings of counterpreservation as a dynamic force in Berlpagesin and as a potential concept for other cities"-- |
|---|
| | "In Berlin, decrepit structures do not always denote urban blight. Decayed buildings are incorporated into everyday life as residences, exhibition spaces, shops, offices, and as leisure space. As nodes of public dialogue, they serve as platforms for dissenting views about the future and past of Berlin. In this book, Daniela Sandler introduces the concept of counterpreservation as a way to understand this intentional appropriation of decrepitude. The embrace of decay is a sign of Berlin's iconoclastic rebelliousness, but it has also been incorporated into the mainstream economy of tourism and development as part of the city's countercultural cachet. Sandler presents the possibilities and shortcomings of counterpreservation as a dynamic force in Berlin and as a potential concept for other cities"-- |
|---|
| URL: | Inhaltsverzeichnis: http://d-nb.info/1135976880/04 |
|---|
| | Rezension: http://www.sehepunkte.de/2017/09/30162.html |
|---|
| | Inhaltsverzeichnis: http://www.gbv.de/dms/weimar/toc/865404402_toc.pdf |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: | (g)Berlin / (s)Stadtentwicklung / (s)Architektur / (s)Stadtsoziologie / (z)Geschichte 1989-2010 |
|---|
| | (g)Berlin / (s)Architektur / (s)Ruine / (s)Nutzung / (s)Gentrifizierung |
|---|
| Sprache: | eng |
|---|
| Bibliogr. Hinweis: | Erscheint auch als : Online-Ausgabe: Sandler, Daniela, 1974 - : Counterpreservation. - Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2016. - 1 online resource (274 pages) |
|---|
| | Rezensiert in: Pugh, Emily: [Rezension von: Daniela Sandler, Counterpreservation. Architectural decay in Berlin since 1989] |
|---|
| K10plus-PPN: | 1563641194 |
|---|
Andere Auflagen/Ausgaben
Zurück zur Trefferübersicht und Suche
