Skip to Content

C6. Insects of the wider countryside (butterflies)

a. Habitat specialists

b. Species of the wider countryside

Type: State Indicator

This indicator was updated in 2023.

Introduction

This indicator consists of two measures of annual butterfly population abundance: the first for habitat specialist butterflies (species strongly associated with semi-natural habitats such as chalk downland) and the second for more widespread butterflies found in both semi-natural habitats and the wider countryside.

Butterflies are complementary to birds and bats as an indicator, especially the habitat specialists, because they use resources in the landscape at a much finer spatial scale than either birds or bats.

Contents

  1. Key results
  2. Habitat Specialists
    1. Figure C6iai. Trends in abundance of habitat specialist butterflies in the UK, 1976 to 2022
    2. Figure C6iaii. Long-term and short-term changes in individual species’ trends for habitat specialist butterflies in the UK, 1976 to 2022
  3. Species of the wider countryside
    1. Figure C6ibi. Trends for the abundance of butterflies of the wider countryside in the UK, 1976 to 2022
    2. Figure C6ibii. Long-term and short-term changes in individual species’ trends for butterflies of the wider countryside in the UK, 1976 to 2022
  4. Assessment of change in butterfly populations
  5. Relevance
  6. Background
    1. Figure C6iia. Trends for the abundance of butterflies of the wider countryside on UK farmland, 1990 to 2022
    2. Figure C6iib. Long-term and short-term changes in individual species’ trends for butterflies of the wider countryside on UK farmland, 1990 to 2022
    3. Figure C6iiia. Trends for butterflies of the wider countryside in UK woodland, 1990 to 2022
    4. Figure C6iiib. Long-term and short-term changes in individual species’ trends for butterflies of the wider countryside in UK woodland, 1990 to 2022
    5. Figure C6iva: Trends for the abundance of all species of butterflies resident in the UK, 1976 to 2022
    6. Figure C6ivb. Long-term and short-term changes in individual species’ trends for all species of butterflies resident in the UK, 1976 to 2022
  7. Goals and Targets
    1. Aichi Targets for which this is a primary indicator
    2. Aichi Targets for which this is a relevant indicator
  8. Web links for further information
  9. Downloads

Key results

Butterfly icon Overall, 2022 was an average year for butterflies in the UK, with 47% of all species contributing to the UK indicators (24 out of 51) falling in abundance from the previous year. 2022 was the warmest year on record in the UK, although the weather fluctuated considerably each month with cooler and unsettled periods alternating with warmer, more settled spells. The rainfall was mostly below average with drought conditions in second half of the summer, especially in eastern parts of England.

Butterfly icon Since 1976, the smoothed trend for habitat specialist butterflies in the UK has declined significantly by 30% (Figure C6ia). Over the same period, the smoothed trend for species of the wider countryside shows no significant change (Figure C6ib).

Butterfly iconLarge fluctuations in numbers between years are a typical feature of butterfly populations, principally in response to weather conditions, hence the statistical assessment of change is made on an analysis of the underlying smoothed rather than unsmoothed trends. Since 2017, both short-term trends show no significant change.

Top

Habitat Specialists

Figure C6iai is a line graph showing how the trend for the UK habitat specialist butterflies index has changed between 1976 and 2022. The smoothed index fell sharply between 1976 and the early 1980s but has since levelled out. The unsmoothed index shows considerable year-on-year variation.

Figure C6iaii is a stacked bar chart showing the percentages of individual species within the UK habitat specialist butterflies index that have shown a statistically significant increase, a statistically significant decrease or no statistically significant change (little change) over both the long term (1976 to 2022) and short term (latest 5 years, 2017 to 2022).

Notes about Figure C6iai and Figure C6iaii:

  1. This indicator includes individual measures for 26 species of butterflies.
  2. Figure C6iaii (the bar chart) shows the percentage of species within the indicator that have shown a statistically significant increase, a statistically significant decrease or no statistically significant change (little change).
  3. Recent improvements to the methodology mean the charts presented here are not directly comparable to those presented in releases prior to 2020.

Source: Butterfly Conservation; UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology; Defra; British Trust for Ornithology; Joint Nature Conservation Committee.

Habitat specialist butterflies, which are vulnerable to semi-natural habitat loss and fragmentation, have not recovered from declines experienced in the late 1970s. These declines were mainly attributed to the knock-on effects of the drought conditions experienced in 1976. Analysis of the smoothed trend for habitat specialist butterflies shows a significant reduction of 30% in relative abundance over this long-term period driven by decreases in 1976 to 1979 (Figure C6iai). There has been no change in the abundance of habitat specialist butterflies since 2017.

Individual butterfly species fare differently within the overall trend. Habitat specialists showing the greatest long-term decline since 1976 include heath fritillary; wood white; Lulworth skipper; grayling; small pearl-bordered fritillary; pearl-bordered fritillary; high brown fritillary; white admiral; and northern brown argus. One species, silver-washed fritillary showed a significant short-term decline since 2017. Habitat specialists showing the largest long-term increases include silver-spotted skipper; black hairstreak; large heath; dark-green fritillary; and silver-washed fritillary, and of these, dark-green fritillary also showed a significant increase since 2017. Both chalk-hill blue and dingy skipper increased over the short term but showed no long-term change. Lulworth skipper increased over the short term but showed a decrease over the long term. 

Top

Species of the wider countryside

Figure C6ibi is a line graph showing how the trend for the UK butterflies in the wider countryside index has changed between 1976 and 2022. The smoothed index remained relatively stable. The unsmoothed index shows considerable year-on-year variation

Figure C6ibii is a stacked bar chart showing the percentages of individual species within the butterflies of the wider countryside index that have shown a statistically significant increase, a statistically significant decrease or no statistically significant change (little change) over both the long term (1976 to 2022) and short term (latest 5 years, 2017 to 2022).

Notes about Figure C6ibi and Figure C6ibii:

  1. This indicator includes individual measures for 25 species of butterflies; the wider countryside index, however, only includes 24 trends. This is because an aggregate trend is used for small skipper (Thymelicus lineola) and Essex skipper (Thymelicus sylvestris) and has been retained for indicator consistency; these two species were combined due to historical difficulties with distinguishing between them in the field.
  2. Figure C6ibii (the bar chart) shows the percentage of species trends within the indicator that have shown a statistically significant increase, a statistically significant decrease or no statistically significant change (little change).
  3. Recent improvements to the methodology mean the charts presented here are not directly comparable to those presented in releases prior to 2020.

Source: Butterfly Conservation; UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology; British Trust for Ornithology; Defra; Joint Nature Conservation Committee.

The butterflies of the wider countryside index for the UK has not changed in either the long-term (1976 to 2022) or the short-term (2017 to 2022) (Figure C6ibi).

Individual butterfly species again fare differently within the overall trend. Species of the wider countryside showing the greatest long-term declines include wall; small tortoiseshell; and white-letter hairstreak. No wider countryside butterfly species have declined in the short term. The ringlet; comma; speckled wood; and marbled white show the largest increases over the long term, but no species of the wider countryside butterflies have increased in abundance in the short term. 

Top

Assessment of change in butterfly populations

  Long term Short term Latest year
Habitat specialists

Deteriorating

 1976–2022

Little or no overall change

2017–2022

Little or no change

(2022)

Species of the wider countryside

Little or no overall change

1976–2022

Little or no overall change

2017–2022

Little or no change

(2022)

Notes for Assessment of Change table:

Long-term and short-term assessments of the statistical significance of these changes are made using the smoothed data to 2022. Analysis of the underlying trends is performed by the data providers.

Top

Relevance

Butterflies are considered to provide a good indication of the broad state of the environment because they respond rapidly to changes in environmental conditions and habitat management, occur in a wide range of habitats, and are representative of many other insects, in that they utilise areas with abundant plant food resources. Butterflies are complementary to birds and bats as indicator species, especially the habitat specialists, because they use resources in the landscape at a much finer spatial scale than either birds or bats. There are also long-term data available on changes in populations of butterflies which help in the interpretation of shorter-term fluctuations.

Top

Background

This indicator is comprised of two multi-species indices compiled by Butterfly Conservation (BC) and the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH) from data collated through the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (UKBMS) including from the Wider Countryside Butterfly Survey (WCBS). The indicator includes individual measures for 26 habitat specialist butterflies (low mobility species restricted to semi-natural habitats) and 25 more widespread butterflies (which use both semi-natural and general countryside habitats). It uses butterfly count data collected at 6,221 sample locations across the UK – 3,996 UKBMS butterfly transect and reduced effort sites and 2,225 randomly selected 1 km squares of the WCBS (see the UKBMS sites details map for further information).

Since 2019, 2 additional multi-species indices have also been compiled for butterflies in the UK: the first for butterflies of the wider countryside on farmland, the second for butterflies of the wider countryside in woodland. Although these habitat-specific measures are not included within the formal assessment for the ‘Insects of the wider countryside’ indicator, they are presented here in order to give a more complete picture of the trends for UK butterfly populations.

The 2 habitat indices include 23 species of wider countryside butterflies surveyed on farmland and 25 species surveyed in woodland using data collected at 4,157 locations with farmland habitat and 2,905 locations with woodland habitat (these farmland and woodland locations are subsets of the 6,221 locations shown in UKBMS sites details map. While these habitat specific measures are compiled from a subset of the species in the UK wider countryside butterflies indicator, the base year for the long-term trends is 1990 rather than 1976. This is because prior to this date, there are insufficient data for a number of species included within the 2 indices.

An annual ‘all-species’ index is also compiled for butterflies that are resident in the UK. As with the additional wider countryside indices, this measure in not formally assessed but it is included here in order to give a higher-level picture of the trend for UK butterfly populations. The ‘all-species’ index includes 51 species of butterflies (26 habitat specialists and 25 species of the wider countryside) and uses data collected at the same 6,221 locations as the 2 core measures (see UKBMS sites details map). It does not include regular migrant species or rarer species with less complete data runs.

While the UK wider countryside butterfly measure, the additional wider countryside farmland and woodland measures and the UK ‘all-species’ measure include 25, 23, 25 and 25 species of wider countryside butterflies respectively, they all include one less trend each. This is because an aggregate trend is used for small skipper (Thymelicus lineola) and Essex skipper (Thymelicus sylvestris). These 2 species have been combined due to historical difficulties with distinguishing between them in the field.

The year-to-year fluctuations in butterfly numbers are often linked to natural environmental variation, especially weather conditions. Therefore, in order to identify underlying patterns in population trends, the assessment of change is based on smoothed indices. The smoothed trend in the multi-species indicator is assessed by structural time-series analysis. A statistical test is performed using the software ‘TrendSpotter’ to compare the difference in the smoothed index in the latest year versus other years in the series. Within the measures, each individual species trend is given equal weight, and the annual figure is the geometric mean of the component species indices for that year.

Populations of individual species within each measure may be increasing or decreasing, irrespective of the overall trends. The bar charts provided alongside each trend graph (Figures C6iaii, C6ibii, C6iib, C6iiib and C6ivb) show the percentage of species within that indicator that have shown a statistically significant increase, a statistically significant decrease or no statistically significant change (little change). A list of species included within each index, together with a summary of the estimated long-term and short-term changes for each species and an assessment of the individual species trends can be found in the accompanying dataset.

As there are delays in data submission, data for previous years are also updated retrospectively. This means that the species indices for individual years may vary from previous publications.

Further details of the methods used can be found on the UKBMS website and in the technical background document for this indicator.

Butterflies of the wider countryside on farmland

The unsmoothed butterflies of the wider countryside on farmland index for the UK decreased by 11% between 1990 and 2021 but increased by 24% in the five years to 2021 (Figure C6iia,b). Analysis of the smoothed trends shows that neither the long-term (1990 to 2021) nor short-term (2016 to 2021) changes are statistically significant.

Figure C6iia is a line graph showing how the trend for UK butterflies of the wider countryside (farmland) index has changed between 1990 and 2022. The smoothed index has been stable throughout the time period. The unsmoothed index has shown considerable year-on-year variation.

Figure C6iib is a stacked bar chart showing the percentage of individual species within the UK butterflies of the wider countryside (farmland) index that have shown a statistically significant increase, a statistically significant decrease or no statistically significant change (little change) over the long term (1990 to 2022) and short term (latest 5 years, 2017 to 2022).

Notes about Figures C6iia and Figure C6iib:

  1. This indicator includes individual measures for 23 species of butterflies; the UK farmland index, however, only includes 22 trends. This is because an aggregate trend is used for small skipper (Thymelicus lineola) and Essex skipper (Thymelicus sylvestris) and has been retained for indicator consistency; these two species were combined due to historical difficulties with distinguishing between them in the field.
  2. Figure C6iib (the bar chart) shows the percentage of species trends within the indicator that have shown a statistically significant increase, a statistically significant decrease or no statistically significant change (little change).
  3. Recent improvements to the methodology mean the charts presented here are not directly comparable to those presented in releases prior to 2020. 

Source: Butterfly Conservation; UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology; British Trust for Ornithology; Defra; Joint Nature Conservation Committee.

Individual butterfly species fare differently within the overall stable long-term trend. Species showing the largest significant long-term decline on farmland include small tortoiseshell; wall; Scotch Argus; and gatekeeper. One species, the large skipper showed a significant decrease on farmland over the short term (since 2017). Six species, white-letter hairstreak; the ringlet; brimstone; speckled wood; marbled white; and orange-tip increased on farmland over the long term. Only one species, the large skipper, has decreased over the short term since 2017, while the remaining species have not changed.

Butterflies of the wider countryside in woodland

The smoothed trend for butterflies of the wider countryside in woodland shows a significant long-term decline of 47% (1990 to 2022). However, in the short term between 2017 and 2022, there was no change in abundance of butterflies of the wider countryside in woodland (Figures C6iiia,b).

Figure C6iiia is a line graph showing how the trend for the UK butterflies of the wider countryside (woodland) index has changed between 1990 and 2022. The smoothed index fell steadily between 1990 and 2006 but has since levelled out. The unsmoothed index has shown considerable year-on-year variation.

Figure C6iiib is a stacked bar chart showing the percentage of individual species within the UK butterflies of the wider countryside (woodland) index that have shown a statistically significant increase, a statistically significant decrease or no statistically significant change (little change) over the long term (1990 to 2022) and short term (latest 5 years, 2017 to 2022).

Notes about Figures C6iiia and Figure C6iiib:

  1. This indicator includes individual measures for 25 species of butterflies; the UK woodland index, however, only includes 24 trends. This is because an aggregate trend is used for small skipper (Thymelicus lineola) and Essex skipper (Thymelicus sylvestris); these two species have been combined due to historical difficulties with distinguishing between them in the field.
  2. Figure C6iiib (the bar chart) shows the percentage of species trends within the indicator that have shown a statistically significant increase, a statistically significant decrease or no statistically significant change (little change).
  3. Recent improvements to the methodology mean the charts presented here are not directly comparable to those presented in releases prior to 2020.

Source: Butterfly Conservation; UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology; British Trust for Ornithology; Defra; Joint Nature Conservation Committee.

The long-term decline of woodland butterflies is thought to be due to a lack of woodland management and loss of open spaces in woods. Species showing the greatest significant long-term declines in woodland include wall; small copper; small tortoiseshell; small or Essex skipper; and gatekeeper. No species show a significant decline in the short term. The ringlet displayed the same trends in woodland as on farmland, increasing significantly in both habitats over the long term, but showing no significant change since 2017. No other woodland butterflies show a significant long-term increase, and none show a significant increase over the short term.

UK ‘all-species’ index

The ‘all-species’ butterflies index for the UK shows significant declines in both the long and short term of 15% and 2% respectively. This assessment of change is made on an analysis of the smoothed trend; long-term (1976 to 2022) and short-term (2017 to 2022) (Figures C6iva,b).

Individual butterfly species fare differently within the overall declining long-term trend. Species in significant long-term decline across the UK include heath fritillary; wall; wood white; small tortoiseshell; white-letter hairstreak; Lulworth skipper; grayling; small-pearl-bordered fritillary; pearl-bordered fritillary; high brown fritillary and white admiral. One species, silver-washed fritillary showed a significant decline over the short term. Species displaying the greatest statistically significant increases over the long term include silver-spotted skipper; black hairstreak; large heath; the ringlet; dark green fritillary; and silver-washed fritillary. Dark green fritillary also increased significantly over the short term. Chalk hill blue and dingy skipper both increased significantly over the short term but showed no long-term change.

Figure C6iva is a line graph showing how the trend for the UK butterflies (all species resident in the UK) index has changed between 1976 and 2022. The smoothed index shows very little variation. The unsmoothed index has shown considerable year-on-year variation.

Figure C6ivb is a stacked bar chart showing the percentage of individual species within the all butterfly species resident in the UK index that have shown a statistically significant increase, a statistically significant decrease or no statistically significant change (little change) over the long term (1990 to 2022) and short term (latest 5 years, 2017 to 2022).

Notes about Figures C6iva and Figure C6ivb:

  1. This indicator includes individual measures for 51 species of butterflies; the UK ‘all-species’ butterflies’ index, however, only includes 50 trends. This is because an aggregate trend is used for small skipper (Thymelicus lineola) and Essex skipper (Thymelicus sylvestris); these 2 species have been combined due to historical difficulties with distinguishing between them in the field.
  2. Figure C6ivb (the bar chart) shows the percentage of species within the indicator that have shown a statistically significant increase, a statistically significant decrease or no statistically significant change (little change).

Top

Goals and Targets

The UK and England Biodiversity Indicators are currently being assessed alongside the Environment Improvement Plan Targets, and the new Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework Targets, when this work has been completed the references to Biodiversity 2020 and the Aichi Global Biodiversity Framework Targets will be updated.

Aichi Targets for which this is a primary indicator

Strategic Goal B. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use.

Aichi Target 7 icon

Target 7: By 2020, areas under agriculture, aquaculture and forestry are managed sustainably, ensuring conservation of biodiversity.

 

Strategic Goal C. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity.

Aichi Target 12 icon

Target 12: By 2020, the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and their conservation status, particularly of those most in decline, has been improved and sustained.

Aichi Targets for which this is a relevant indicator

Strategic Goal B. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use.

Aichi Target 5 icon

Target 5: By 2020, the rate of loss of all natural habitats, including forests, is at least halved and where feasible brought close to zero, and degradation and fragmentation is significantly reduced.

Strategic Goal C. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity.

Aichi Target 11 icon

Target 11: By 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water, and 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscape and seascapes.

Top

Top

Downloads

Download the Datasheet and Technical background document from JNCC's Resource Hub.

A more general technical document on UKBMS official statistics is available.   

Top

Last updated: November 2023

Latest data available: 2022

 

This content is available on request as a pdf in non-accessible format. If you wish for a copy please go to the enquiries page.

 

Categories:

UK Biodiversity Indicators 2023

Published: .

Back to top