Skip to content

Commit af93547

Browse files
committed
Fix link
1 parent 56f4c0d commit af93547

File tree

1 file changed

+4
-4
lines changed

1 file changed

+4
-4
lines changed

docs/blog/_posts/2016-12-05-implicit-function-types.md

Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -5,9 +5,9 @@ author: Martin Odersky
55
authorImg: /images/martin.jpg
66
---
77

8-
I just made the first pull request to add _implicit function types_ to
9-
Scala. I am pretty excited about it, because, citing the explanation
10-
of the pull request "_This is the first step to bring contextual
8+
I just made the [first pull request](https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/pull/1775) to add _implicit function types_ to
9+
Scala. I am pretty excited about it, because - citing the explanation
10+
of the pull request - "_This is the first step to bring contextual
1111
abstraction to Scala_". That's quite a mouthful, so I better explain what I
1212
mean by it.
1313

@@ -367,4 +367,4 @@ abstractions, in the sense that just declaring a type of a function
367367
will inject certain implicit values into the scope of the function's
368368
implementation. Can this be abused, making code more obscure?
369369
Absolutely, like every other powerful abstraction technique. To keep
370-
your code sane, please keep the (Principle of Least Power)[http://www.lihaoyi.com/post/StrategicScalaStylePrincipleofLeastPower.html] in mind.
370+
your code sane, please keep the [Principle of Least Power](http://www.lihaoyi.com/post/StrategicScalaStylePrincipleofLeastPower.html) in mind.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)