.. index:: single: Dependency Injection; Scopes
This entry is all about scopes, a somewhat advanced topic related to the
:doc:`/book/service_container`. If you've ever gotten an error mentioning
"scopes" when creating services, or need to create a service that depends
on the request
service, then this entry is for you.
The scope of a service controls how long an instance of a service is used by the container. The Dependency Injection component provides two generic scopes:
container
(the default one): The same instance is used each time you request it from this container.prototype
: A new instance is created each time you request the service.
The FrameworkBundle also defines a third scope: request
. This scope is
tied to the request, meaning a new instance is created for each subrequest
and is unavailable outside the request (for instance in the CLI).
Scopes add a constraint on the dependencies of a service: a service cannot
depend on services from a narrower scope. For example, if you create a generic
my_foo
service, but try to inject the request
component, you'll receive
a :class:`Symfony\\Component\\DependencyInjection\\Exception\\ScopeWideningInjectionException`
when compiling the container. Read the sidebar below for more details.
Scopes and Dependencies
Imagine you've configured a my_mailer
service. You haven't configured
the scope of the service, so it defaults to container
. In other words,
every time you ask the container for the my_mailer
service, you get
the same object back. This is usually how you want your services to work.
Imagine, however, that you need the request
service in your my_mailer
service, maybe because you're reading the URL of the current request.
So, you add it as a constructor argument. Let's look at why this presents
a problem:
When requesting
my_mailer
, an instance ofmy_mailer
(let's call it MailerA) is created and therequest
service (let's call it RequestA) is passed to it. Life is good!You've now made a subrequest in Symfony, which is a fancy way of saying that you've called, for example, the
{{ render(...) }}
Twig function, which executes another controller. Internally, the oldrequest
service (RequestA) is actually replaced by a new request instance (RequestB). This happens in the background, and it's totally normal.In your embedded controller, you once again ask for the
my_mailer
service. Since your service is in thecontainer
scope, the same instance (MailerA) is just re-used. But here's the problem: the MailerA instance still contains the old RequestA object, which is now not the correct request object to have (RequestB is now the currentrequest
service). This is subtle, but the mis-match could cause major problems, which is why it's not allowed.So, that's the reason why scopes exist, and how they can cause problems. Keep reading to find out the common solutions.
Note
A service can of course depend on a service from a wider scope without any issue.
The scope of a service is set in the definition of the service:
.. configuration-block:: .. code-block:: yaml # src/Acme/HelloBundle/Resources/config/services.yml services: greeting_card_manager: class: Acme\HelloBundle\Mail\GreetingCardManager scope: request .. code-block:: xml <!-- src/Acme/HelloBundle/Resources/config/services.xml --> <services> <service id="greeting_card_manager" class="Acme\HelloBundle\Mail\GreetingCardManager" scope="request" /> </services> .. code-block:: php // src/Acme/HelloBundle/Resources/config/services.php use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Definition; $container->setDefinition( 'greeting_card_manager', new Definition('Acme\HelloBundle\Mail\GreetingCardManager') )->setScope('request');
If you don't specify the scope, it defaults to container
, which is what
you want most of the time. Unless your service depends on another service
that's scoped to a narrower scope (most commonly, the request
service),
you probably don't need to set the scope.
If your service depends on a scoped service, the best solution is to put
it in the same scope (or a narrower one). Usually, this means putting your
new service in the request
scope.
But this is not always possible (for instance, a twig extension must be in
the container
scope as the Twig environment needs it as a dependency).
In these cases, you should pass the entire container into your service and
retrieve your dependency from the container each time you need it to be sure
you have the right instance:
// src/Acme/HelloBundle/Mail/Mailer.php namespace Acme\HelloBundle\Mail; use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ContainerInterface; class Mailer { protected $container; public function __construct(ContainerInterface $container) { $this->container = $container; } public function sendEmail() { $request = $this->container->get('request'); // ... do something using the request here } }
Caution!
Take care not to store the request in a property of the object for a future call of the service as it would cause the same issue described in the first section (except that Symfony cannot detect that you are wrong).
The service config for this class would look something like this:
.. configuration-block:: .. code-block:: yaml # src/Acme/HelloBundle/Resources/config/services.yml parameters: # ... my_mailer.class: Acme\HelloBundle\Mail\Mailer services: my_mailer: class: "%my_mailer.class%" arguments: - "@service_container" # scope: container can be omitted as it is the default .. code-block:: xml <!-- src/Acme/HelloBundle/Resources/config/services.xml --> <parameters> <!-- ... --> <parameter key="my_mailer.class">Acme\HelloBundle\Mail\Mailer</parameter> </parameters> <services> <service id="my_mailer" class="%my_mailer.class%"> <argument type="service" id="service_container" /> </service> </services> .. code-block:: php // src/Acme/HelloBundle/Resources/config/services.php use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Definition; use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Reference; // ... $container->setParameter('my_mailer.class', 'Acme\HelloBundle\Mail\Mailer'); $container->setDefinition('my_mailer', new Definition( '%my_mailer.class%', array(new Reference('service_container')) ));
Note
Injecting the whole container into a service is generally not a good
idea (only inject what you need). In some rare cases, it's necessary
when you have a service in the container
scope that needs a service
in the request
scope.
If you define a controller as a service then you can get the Request
object
without injecting the container by having it passed in as an argument of your
action method. See :ref:`book-controller-request-argument` for details.