-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
git cinnabar fsck
reports bad files
#295
Comments
Is it the same repo you fixed in #280? Can you create a git bundle the same way you did back then? |
Can you do another one with |
Sent it 👍 |
This time, your repo is more busted than last time, but it's still the same root cause (#207). I'm bummed that the situation was not detected. You seem to have a setup that amplified the problem, creating a diverging history from gecko-dev. I suspect you have a pref like You can fix your repo with I think you're the first person to whom this happened twice, so if you don't mind, I'd like to ask you to set something up after I work on some debugging code. |
No, this is all I have:
👍 Feel free to ping me whenever it's ready. |
During rebase...
👀 Should I send one again? The crash report has nothing interesting:
|
Is it the first time you see something like this?
How do you push to try? |
I believe I saw it at least once before this 🤔
I use |
I wish you had reported it back then because it showed that the diagnostic code for #207 worked but failed to report the problem correctly with python3 :-/
Do you maybe
Can you update git-cinnabar to latest master, run |
Oops, sorry 😬
TIL it exists, but I think I never fetch from try.
Will do that 👍 (Edit: It didn't break) |
Something doesn't line up. When you push to try, can you check whether |
👀 |
Hmm, I ran |
did you |
I did |
Kind of. I'm baffled you didn't see the other error message before that... |
Which error message? |
git-cinnabar/cinnabar/githg.py Lines 1324 to 1336 in 6ee0223
|
No, haven't seen that one so far, sorry 🥲 |
Do you still have the repo from #295 (comment) ? |
I don't but I made a gitbundle from it, so maybe I can say I do? |
Is it a different clone from the previous one? |
Same clone but after |
That doesn't sound true. The bundle you sent me has a bustage that started in august (which explains why you didn't get the bustage detection error), and doesn't contain b1fe9b8493dbb38038c230f2fb346bfa803a60fe |
I mean right after #295 (comment), I made the bundle after this as I expected your request to share it, 🤔 Weird that it still had the bustage, I guess |
But it's a different clone than the one you opened this issue for, right? |
It was still the same clone. I didn't do |
So, this exposes a flaw in |
You do still seem to have hit #207 several times, so please keep |
Yeah, I had to reclone to fix the broken pipe error. I'll report again if it happens again. |
Just sent you the bundle files again. This time there was some interesting things in cinnabar.log:
But not sure it's actually related as there was no timestamps. |
But those revision don't seem to actually exist?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: