Skip to content

Conversation

@gumb0
Copy link
Member

@gumb0 gumb0 commented Sep 20, 2024

Most probably these are not compatible with LLDB 😞

@gumb0 gumb0 force-pushed the gdb-pretty-printers branch from 7ac92f6 to f838f43 Compare September 20, 2024 13:59
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.19%. Comparing base (9a31345) to head (431215c).
Report is 21 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1024   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.19%   94.19%           
=======================================
  Files         149      149           
  Lines       15887    15887           
=======================================
  Hits        14964    14964           
  Misses        923      923           
Flag Coverage Δ
eof_execution_spec_tests 17.25% <ø> (ø)
ethereum_tests 27.32% <ø> (ø)
ethereum_tests_silkpre 19.12% <ø> (ø)
execution_spec_tests 20.42% <ø> (ø)
unittests 88.96% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@gumb0 gumb0 changed the title Add GDB pretty printers for evmc_address, evmc_bytes32, evmc_bytes Add GDB pretty printers for evmc_address, evmc_bytes32, evmc_bytes, intx::uint256 Sep 20, 2024
@gumb0 gumb0 force-pushed the gdb-pretty-printers branch 4 times, most recently from 56556af to 006b506 Compare September 20, 2024 19:40
@gumb0 gumb0 changed the title Add GDB pretty printers for evmc_address, evmc_bytes32, evmc_bytes, intx::uint256 Add GDB pretty printers for evmc_address, evmc_bytes32, evmc::bytes, evmc::bytes_view, intx::uint256 Sep 20, 2024
@gumb0 gumb0 requested a review from chfast September 20, 2024 19:41
@gumb0 gumb0 force-pushed the gdb-pretty-printers branch 2 times, most recently from 0a877ef to c2499a9 Compare September 23, 2024 09:52
@chfast chfast force-pushed the gdb-pretty-printers branch from 431215c to 3de7134 Compare October 18, 2024 10:18
@chfast chfast force-pushed the gdb-pretty-printers branch from 3de7134 to 32cd344 Compare October 18, 2024 10:20
@chfast chfast changed the title Add GDB pretty printers for evmc_address, evmc_bytes32, evmc::bytes, evmc::bytes_view, intx::uint256 Add GDB pretty printers for common bytes and uint256 types Oct 18, 2024
@chfast chfast merged commit 45b3fe5 into master Oct 18, 2024
@chfast chfast deleted the gdb-pretty-printers branch October 18, 2024 10:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants