User talk:SHB2000

From Wikivoyage
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JarrahTree (talk | contribs) at 01:14, 7 February 2022 (back after a rather long break).

Latest comment: 2 years ago by JarrahTree in topic it takes a while sometime
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This is the talk page of SHB2000

General

  • If you need help with anything at all, please leave a message right here on this talk page.
  • If there's something you need to discuss in private, email me in strictest confidence. Need to be autoconfirmed though, if not go and message me on a random WMF project that no one would ever be thinking of going to if you're not autoconfirmed (list of wikis here).
  • Feeling bored and want to have a chat, I'm more than happy to do so.
  • If you're having difficulty in accessing this talk page, go to b:User talk:SHB2000 or m:User talk:SHB2000. I check both talk pages frequently and get notifications on both. However, do not go to my English Wikipedia talk page. The English Wikipedia is not the centre of all WMF projects.
  • This page is also protected often due to the result of x-wiki vandals and long-term abusers. If that's the case, then go to my IP talk page.
  • The reply tool may not work on this page.
  • Rollbacks used (for personal reference)
  • I'm open to technical questions here, but at the same time, you may also get a better response at the travellers' pub

Archives

Main archives (current archive)

Other archives (mostly defunct nowadays)

  • Pub archive – all discussions swept from the pub
  • Barncompass archive – all barncompasses here (although I do have another copy of this on my userpage)

Docent

  • If you're here to ask me a docent question, then this is the place. Expect a reply within 1–7 days, unless you see a box saying that I'm travelling.
  • If this page is protected, then follow the same instructions for anons (or IP users) and go to my IP talk page or my Meta talk page.

Click here to message me – I will reply as soon as I can. All replies will be made directly underneath your message on this page. Do be aware though, that I do not use talkback. I do on the other hand, use pings as I've more or less given up on watchlists, but may not always ping you (usually, if the message has gone unanswered for about more than 12-18 hours, then I'd usually give a ping).

Threads on this page are archived every 14 days of inactivity, but mass mail messages may get archived earlier, while active threads might get archived later than 14 days of inactivity, but how this page is archived isn't consistent merely because a bot couldn't do its job.


Table of contents

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

17:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Block of 112.134.171.76

You and I can both see the telltale signs of a hotel publicist, but I don't think their listings were that bad, and I was going to either edit my post or add another one to the effect that I didn't actually revert their listing. Plus, we didn't warn that IP before a block. So I would lift the block, but I wasn't going to do so without contacting you. What do you think? Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nevermind, I see your explanation. Good call. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yeah I warned the IP on another page regarding the use of USD for destinations clearly where USD won't be accepted in User talk:116.206.244.93 and User talk:175.157.226.124 but they just ignored me :-(. For that, per Wikivoyage:How to handle unwanted edits#Escalating user blocks, I blocked them for three days. Not to forget the touting... SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 09:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Also looks like one of their edit was reverted by @Ibaman:. Currently on the hunt or further edits by this IP-hopping tout. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 09:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
A few years ago, loads of Ascott properties were listed throughout the world by folks who if I remember listed only them and one other chain. We should be on the lookout for that. I delisted one Ascott property this user added, as there were plenty of other hotels listed in that article and no real reason to play around with a touting paid publicist. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
This IP seems to be adding a lot of Parkroyal listings too. Perhaps time to delist all of them? --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 09:31, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I don't know. It's always hard to know which listings were added legitimately on this site. For that reason, I never trust hotel or restaurant listings here and always cross-reference them with other sites. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

program vs programme

To answer your question, in Singapore "program" is used in the context of a computer program, but otherwise, it's always "programme". So essentially, the same as in the UK. The dog2 (talk) 16:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I see. Was just asking because in Australia, it's "program" for everything, similar to the U.S. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 20:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Exact date not relevant"

You changed "Newly built in the last several years" to "Newly built" in Kabul, as "exact date not relevant in a travel guide". The exact date is not, but "newly built" needs at least a year.

In this case an IP editor had copied the listing from WT, and the venue was "newly built in the last several years" already back in 2013. Not that critical for a cricket stadium, but from another IP it was added that the airport is "fully open", also a WT copy, and also that wording was there in 2013.

LPfi (talk) 09:58, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure whether you're talking about the right diff – my edit was Special:Diff/4382704 which was a copyedit and removing 15 from August 15. Was there an edit conflict or something? SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 10:02, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oops. It seems the IP editor added a redundant listing. Ours had been edited to remove the odd "in the last several years". I removed ours thinking it was the newly added one, and as it had "changed" from last I checked, I though it must have been edited in the only edit made since it was added. Sorry. –LPfi (talk) 10:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
No problems. That edit history with two IPs copying was confusing at first, but thanks for handling the copyvio. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 10:50, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tentative list

Just making sure you're aware than on the UNESCO tentative list just means that the government as submitted to unesco for review and unesco hasn't reviewed it yet. Your description of Qajartalik on Qikertaaluk Island made it seem like it was already a unesco site. Tai123.123 (talk) 02:22, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I'm well aware of it. I should have perhaps worded it better on Qikertaaluk Island. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

it takes a while sometime

walking the nullarbor for instance, which on some wikis is no longer a plain ? I'm back and intact, sorry for the delay in replies at various instances... JarrahTree (talk) 01:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply