Jump to content

China: Difference between revisions

From Wikiquote
Content deleted Content added
removed image
Tag: Reverted
Apisite (talk | contribs)
W: Added a new Quotation from Radio Free Asia
 
(42 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg|thumb|Flag of China]]
{{split}}
'''{{w|China}}''' ([[w:Simplified Chinese characters|Chinese]]: 中国; {{w|pinyin}}: ''Zhōngguó''), officially the '''People's Republic of China''' ('''PRC'''), is a country in {{w|East Asia}}. It is the world's [[w:List of countries by population (United Nations)|second-most populous country]] with [[w:Demographics of China|a population]] exceeding 1.4 billion. China spans the equivalent of five {{w|time zone}}s and [[w:Borders of China|borders]] fourteen countries by land, tied with [[Russia]] as having the [[w:List of countries and territories by number of land borders|most of any country]] in the world. With an area of nearly 9.6 million square kilometres (3,700,000 sq mi), it is the world's [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|third largest country]] by total land area. The country consists of 22 [[w:Provinces of China|provinces]], five [[w:Autonomous regions of China|autonomous regions]], four [[w:Direct-administered municipalities of China|municipalities]], and two [[w:Special administrative regions of China|special administrative regions]] ([[Hong Kong]] and {{w|Macau}}). The national capital is [[Beijing]], and the [[w:List of cities in China by population|most populous]] city and largest {{w|financial center}} is [[Shanghai]].


[[File:Flag of China.svg|thumb|There are some bored foreigners, with full stomachs, who have nothing better to do than point fingers at us… First, China doesn't export Revolution; second, China doesn't export hunger and poverty; third, China doesn't come and cause you headaches, what more is there to be said? ~ [[Xi Jinping]]]]
'''[[w:China|China]]''', officially the '''[[w:China|People's Republic of China]]''' ('''PRC'''; [[w:Chinese language|Chinese]]: ''中华人民共和国''; [[w:Pinyin|pinyin]]: ''Zhōnghuá Rénmín Gònghéguó''), is a [[Countries|country]] located in eastern Eurasia. Also a cultural region and ancient civilization, it is one of the world's oldest civilizations, with successive states and cultures dating back more than six thousand years. Due to the stalemate of the [[Chinese Civil War]] following the end of [[World War II]], China split off into two separate countries: the [[w:China|People's Republic of China]] (PRC) and [[w:Taiwan|Republic of China]] (ROC), more commonly known as "Taiwan". The PRC administers and governs [[w:Mainland China|mainland China]], [[Hong Kong]], and [[w:Macau|Macau]], whereas the ROC only manages to control [[Taiwan]] and its surrounding islands. Each government claims that it is the only legitimate government of China and refuses to recognize the other. However, the PRC is recognized as the only official government of China by the [[United Nations]] and the overwhelming majority of the world's countries and is what most of the world's peoples refer to as "China".
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__

{{TOCalpha}}
{{TOCalpha}}


==Quotes==
==Quotes==
===A===
===A===
* China, despite many imperfections in its economic and political system, has been the most rapidly growing nation of the past three decades. [[w:poverty in China|Chinese poverty]] until [[Mao Zedong]]’s death had nothing to do with [[w:Chinese culture|Chinese culture]]; it was due to the disastrous way Mao organized the economy and conducted politics. In the 1950s, he promoted the [[w:Great Leap Forward|Great Leap Forward]], a drastic [[industrialization]] policy that led to mass starvation and famine. In the 1960s, he propagated the [[Cultural Revolution]], which led to the mass persecution of [[Intellectual|intellectuals]] and educated people—anyone whose party loyalty might be doubted. This again led to terror and a huge waste of the society’s talent and resources. In the same way, current Chinese growth has nothing to do with Chinese values or changes in Chinese culture; it results from a process of [[Chinese economic reform|economic transformation]] unleashed by the reforms implemented by [[Deng Xiaoping]] and his allies, who, after Mao Zedong’s death, gradually abandoned [[Socialism|socialist]] economic policies and institutions, first in [[agriculture]] and then in industry.
* China, despite many imperfections in its economic and political system, has been the most rapidly growing nation of the past three decades. [[w:poverty in China|Chinese poverty]] until [[Mao Zedong]]’s death had nothing to do with [[w:Chinese culture|Chinese culture]]; it was due to the disastrous way Mao organized the economy and conducted politics. In the 1950s, he promoted the [[w:Great Leap Forward|Great Leap Forward]], a drastic [[industrialization]] policy that led to mass starvation and [[famine]]. In the 1960s, he propagated the [[Cultural Revolution]], which led to the mass persecution of [[Intellectual|intellectuals]] and educated people—anyone whose party loyalty might be doubted. This again led to terror and a huge waste of the society’s talent and resources. In the same way, current Chinese growth has nothing to do with Chinese values or changes in Chinese culture; it results from a process of [[Chinese economic reform|economic transformation]] unleashed by the reforms implemented by [[Deng Xiaoping]] and his allies, who, after Mao Zedong’s death, gradually abandoned [[Socialism|socialist]] economic policies and institutions, first in [[agriculture]] and then in industry.
**Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson, ''Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty'' (2012)
**Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson, ''Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty'' (2012)
*A neighbor with one billion people equipped with [[Nuclear weapons|nuclear bombs]] and has expanded its military outlays by double digits for 17 years in a row, and it is unclear as to what this is being used for. It is beginning to be a considerable threat.
*A neighbor with one billion people equipped with [[Nuclear weapons|nuclear bombs]] and has expanded its military outlays by double digits for 17 years in a row, and it is unclear as to what this is being used for. It is beginning to be a considerable threat.
Line 18: Line 18:
**[[Steve Bannon]], as quoted in [http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html "Donald Trump Didn’t Want to Be President"] (January 2017), by Michael Wolff, ''NY Mag''
**[[Steve Bannon]], as quoted in [http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html "Donald Trump Didn’t Want to Be President"] (January 2017), by Michael Wolff, ''NY Mag''
[[File:Chinese_sailors_qingdao.jpg|thumb|The Chinese said of themselves several thousand years ago, China is a sea that salts all the waters that flow into it. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]
[[File:Beijing XiuShui Silk Market.jpg|thumb|The Chinese experiment which has steadily brought a large section of the population into a material abundance which they have never known before. Perhaps 20 million people can now experience the material well-being of the more affluent parts of Europe and America. This is altogether new and has alleviated elsewhere in China a tremendous amount of poverty. It is true that there are sections of China which are still poor, but as a whole China has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before... ~ [[Benjamin Creme]] ]]
[[File:Shanghai - Pudong - Lujiazui.jpg|thumb|The Chinese in themselves have first rate recommendations. They are industrious, docile, cleanly, frugal. They are dexterous of hand, patient in toil, marvelously gifted in the power of imitation, and have but few wants. ~ [[Frederick Douglass]]]]
[[File:Shanghai pudong.jpg|thumb|I doubt if the Chinese are more untruthful than other people. At this point I have one certain test. Mankind are not held together by lies. Trust is the foundation of society. Where there is no truth, there can be no trust, and where there is no trust, there can be no society. Where there is society, there is trust, and where there is trust, there is something upon which it is supported. Now a people who have confided in each other for five thousand years; who have extended their empire in all directions until it embraces one-fifth of the population of the globe; who hold important commercial relations with all nations; who are now entering into treaty stipulations with ourselves, and with all the great European powers, cannot be a nation of cheats and liars. ~ [[Frederick Douglass]]]]
[[File:BeijingWatchTower.jpg|thumb|The Chinese are less a nation than a fusion of peoples united by a common culture, and the history of China is the record of an expanding culture. ~ [[Wikipedia:Charles Patrick Fitzgerald|Charles Patrick Fitzgerald]]]]
[[File:National Emblem of the People's Republic of China (2).svg|thumb|The key point is – is the rise of China legitimate? Is taking 20 per cent of humanity – 1.4 billion people – from abject poverty something the world should welcome?...If we give China the recognition I believe it is due in terms of its legitimacy … then I think a lot of these issues, the so-called 14 points, sort of fall off the table... ~ [[Paul Keating]]]]
[[File:ConfuciusHartford.jpg|thumb|You’ve got to remember that China is broadly a [[Confucius|Confucian society]] that believes in harmony, in authority, and it is with this background that it accepts, I think broadly, the role of the [[W:Chinese Communist party|Chinese Communist party]]. I mean, the idea that we have that if you don’t vote at the local ballot box, that is, if you are not a Jeffersonian liberal, then you are a savage, belies the fact that China has a 4,000-year history which has these characteristics about it ~ [[Paul Keating]]]]
[[File:Shanghai skyline at night, panoramic. China, East Asia-2.jpg|thumb|The Chinese are industrious, courageous, honest, and intelligent. They created the splendid ancient Chinese civilization, and today, they're firmly committed to the path of peaceful development and are making continuous progress. ~ [[Hu Jintao|Jintao Hu]]]]
[[File:China Senate House.jpg|thumb|China should represent the development trends of [[W:Theory of the productive forces|advanced productive forces]], the orientations of an advanced culture and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the people. ~ [[Jiang Zemin|Zemin Jiang]]]]

[[File:Flag of the Republic of China (3).JPG|thumb|The invader will lose funds or patience before the loins of China will lose virility. ~ [[w:Will Durant|Will Durant]] and [[w:Ariel Durant|Ariel Durant]]]]
[[File:1950-07-Cover-Mao Zedong.jpg|thumb| Asia now stands at the dawn a new history of civilization to create its own future, finally emerging from the long tunnel of 150 years of westernization and overcoming the ideological conflicts of the twentieth century. Having achieved advanced [[industrialization]] based on market economics in the latter half of the twentieth century, the region is now home to some 900 million people in the middle class and about 1.1 billion 'netizens' connected by the Internet. ~ [[w:Stephan Haggard|Stephan Haggard]]]]

[[File:North Korea - China friendship (5578914865).jpg|thumb|One day somebody should remind us that, even though there may be political and ideological differences between us, the [[Vietnam]]ese are our brothers, the [[Russia]]ns are our brothers, the [[China|Chinese]] are our brothers; and one day we've got to sit down together at the table of brotherhood. ~ [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]]]]
[[File:Soldiers of the Chinese People's Liberation Army - 2011.jpg|thumb|I should esteem the man who advised a war with China to be the greatest living enemy of my country. You would be beaten in the end. ~ [[Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleon]]]]

[[File:Yangshuo-Plakate-KangzhanLu-16-SDI2741.jpg|thumb|China as a society, a government, an economy and a culture is quite difficult for us to comprehend today. The changes are so rapid in cities like Beijing and Shanghai and the culture remarkably fluid... China is increasingly influential in the world and more and more people have hopes that China will be a leader... China has ended up playing a critical role in geopolitics more quickly than anybody had anticipated.~{{w|Emanuel Pastreich}}]]
[[File:Yangshuo-Plakate-KangzhanLu-16-SDI2741.jpg|thumb|China as a society, a government, an economy and a culture is quite difficult for us to comprehend today. The changes are so rapid in cities like Beijing and Shanghai and the culture remarkably fluid... China is increasingly influential in the world and more and more people have hopes that China will be a leader... China has ended up playing a critical role in geopolitics more quickly than anybody had anticipated.~{{w|Emanuel Pastreich}}]]
[[File:High speed rail, hangzhou.jpg|thumb|China is getting ahead simply because of its courage, hard work, the genius of its people, and all this, under the wise leadership... and its central planning... doing the greatest service to humanity... ~Andre Vltchek]]
[[File:CRH High Speed Rail (30359585927).jpg|thumb|China is building, inventing, struggling and marching forward, confidently, surrounded by friends, but independently. ~Andre Vltchek]]


*The most striking [[cultural]] shifts in China over the last two decades or so has been the revival, both orchestrated and spontaneous, of tradition. The main trope for [[W:Culture of the People's Republic of China|culture]] in the twentieth century, especially since 1949, has been anti-[[traditionalism]]. As far back as the {{w|May 4th movement}} in 1919, and before, whether it was the financial [[elite]], the [[Liberalism|liberals]], the [[Marxism|Marxists]], or [[Anarchism|anarchists]] they all agreed that China was poor and that one of the causes of that state of affairs was the backward traditional [[W:Chinese culture|culture]]... '''We have witnessed a dramatic reevaluation of tradition in China, and also in other {{w|East Asian}} countries with a [[Confucianism|Confucian]] heritage such as [[Korea]]. This part of the world has witnessed rapid growth over the last three decades that has sharply reduced poverty and the region has remained at peace. So when people look around and ask what do all these countries have in common, one answer is their Confucian heritage. So whereas the previous narrative was that Confucianism undermined modernization and [[economic growth]], now many argue that it actually helps... Chinese thinkers gave much thought to how to select able and virtuous [[political]] [[leaders]], which abilities matter and which virtues matter? Chinese pondered about, and experimented with, mechanisms for selecting leaders. And that tradition continues on today.
*The most striking [[cultural]] shifts in China over the last two decades or so has been the revival, both orchestrated and spontaneous, of tradition. The main trope for [[W:Culture of the People's Republic of China|culture]] in the twentieth century, especially since 1949, has been anti-[[traditionalism]]. As far back as the {{w|May 4th movement}} in 1919, and before, whether it was the financial [[elite]], the [[Liberalism|liberals]], the [[Marxism|Marxists]], or [[Anarchism|anarchists]] they all agreed that China was poor and that one of the causes of that state of affairs was the backward traditional [[W:Chinese culture|culture]]... '''We have witnessed a dramatic reevaluation of tradition in China, and also in other {{w|East Asian}} countries with a [[Confucianism|Confucian]] heritage such as [[Korea]]. This part of the world has witnessed rapid growth over the last three decades that has sharply reduced poverty and the region has remained at peace. So when people look around and ask what do all these countries have in common, one answer is their Confucian heritage. So whereas the previous narrative was that Confucianism undermined modernization and [[economic growth]], now many argue that it actually helps... Chinese thinkers gave much thought to how to select able and virtuous [[political]] [[leaders]], which abilities matter and which virtues matter? Chinese pondered about, and experimented with, mechanisms for selecting leaders. And that tradition continues on today.
** [[Daniel Bell]], as quoted in [http://thediplomat.com/2015/12/interview-daniel-bell/ "Chinese meritocracy and the limits of democracy"] (17 December 2015), by {{w|Emanuel Pastreich}}, ''The Diplomat''
** [[Daniel Bell]], as quoted in [http://thediplomat.com/2015/12/interview-daniel-bell/ "Chinese meritocracy and the limits of democracy"] (17 December 2015), by {{w|Emanuel Pastreich}}, ''The Diplomat''

*Over the last thirty years in China, the political leadership has been selected first and foremost through examinations, followed by evaluations of performance at lower levels of government. No one rises to the top without extensive experience at all levels. And that approach is quite similar in form to what we have seen throughout much of Chinese imperial history.''' I do think that the central {{w|political ideas}} articulated in Chinese culture ought to serve as the standard for evaluating political progress or regress in China. And I do think those values are different from the liberal ideas embraced... China has been thrust into this global [[role]] very quickly, perhaps far more quickly than anybody imagined, including the Chinese. The relative political and economic weight of China has increased so dramatically as to be disorienting to Chinese. When people talk about the achievements of China over the past thirty years the most commonly cited one is poverty reduction. About half a billion people were lifted out of [[w:Poverty in China|poverty]], in part due to energizing the people through [[w:Market reforms|market reforms]]. But that process was only possible because there were public officials overseeing the work and they were promoted based on their performance. Political meritocracy itself is a key to reducing poverty... But the other achievement of China is that it has not fought a war since 1979.
** {{w|Daniel A. Bell}}, as quoted in [http://thediplomat.com/2015/12/interview-daniel-bell/ "Chinese meritocracy and the limits of democracy"] (17 December 2015), by {{w|Emanuel Pastreich}}, ''The Diplomat''

*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in [[Afghanistan]] and [[Libya]], is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: [[Russia]] and China... NATO seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today's world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia's violation of [[international law]] in [[Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation|Crimea]] as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must "return to full compliance with international law." But it ignores the U.S. and NATO's far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling [[Cold War II|the renewed Cold War]]: Illegal [[w:Kosovo War|invasions of Kosovo]], [[War in Afghanistan (2001-present)|Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq War|Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into [[Eastern Europe]]... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. [[w:Proxy war|proxy wars]] in [[w:Libyan Civil War|Libya]] and [[w:Syrian Civil War|Syria]], which plunged both countries into chaos, revived [[Al-Qaeda|Al Qaeda]] and spawned the [[Islamic State]].. U.S. management of the [[w:Euromaiden|2014 coup]] in [[Ukraine]], which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia's defense spending by 11 to 1 and China's by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries' military spending.
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It's No Longer Useful to This One ''Salon''], (24 February 2021)

*NATO's failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls "uncertain times" should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison.
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It's No Longer Useful to This One ''Salon''], (24 February 2021)


*If I were an [[English people|Englishman]], '''I should esteem the man who advised a war with China to be the greatest living enemy of my country. You would be beaten in the end''', and perhaps a [[revolution]] in [[India]] would follow.
*If I were an [[English people|Englishman]], '''I should esteem the man who advised a war with China to be the greatest living enemy of my country. You would be beaten in the end''', and perhaps a [[revolution]] in [[India]] would follow.
Line 58: Line 31:
* The United States welcomes the emergence of a China that is peaceful and prosperous and that supports international institutions.
* The United States welcomes the emergence of a China that is peaceful and prosperous and that supports international institutions.
** [[George W. Bush]], speech at the White House (April 2006), as quoted in [http://www.c-span.org/video/?192123-1/chinese-president-arrival-ceremony "Chinese President Arrival Ceremony"] (20 April 2006), ''C-SPAN''
** [[George W. Bush]], speech at the White House (April 2006), as quoted in [http://www.c-span.org/video/?192123-1/chinese-president-arrival-ceremony "Chinese President Arrival Ceremony"] (20 April 2006), ''C-SPAN''

[[File:Beijing from space.jpg|thumb|Since 1979, do you know how many times China has been at war with anybody? None. And we have stayed at [[war]]. (The United States is) the most warlike nation in the history of the world... How many miles of [[High-speed rail|high-speed railroad]] do we have in this country?... We have [[waste|wasted]], I think, $3 trillion ([[Military-industrial complex|military spending]]) ... China has not wasted a single penny on war, and that's why they're ahead of us. ~ [[Jimmy Carter]] ]]
===C===
===C===
* There is a tendency in parts of Chinese thinking which says: ''"We need not only to be an important power in the region, we need to dominate the region!"''.
* There is a tendency in parts of Chinese thinking which says: ''"We need not only to be an important power in the region, we need to dominate the region!"''.
** [[Ashton Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016)
** [[Ashton Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016)

*I normalized [[China–United States relations|diplomatic relations]] with [[China]] in 1979. Since 1979, do you know how many times China has been at war with anybody? None. And we have stayed at [[war]]. (The United States is) the most warlike nation in the history of the world... How many miles of [[High-speed rail|high-speed railroad]] do we have in this country?... We have wasted, I think, $3 trillion ([[Military-industrial complex|military spending]]) ... China has not wasted a single penny on war, and that's why they're ahead of us. In almost every way... And I think the difference is if you take $3 trillion and put it in American infrastructure, you'd probably have $2 trillion left over. We'd have high-speed railroad. We'd have [[Bridge|bridges]] that aren't collapsing. We'd have [[Road|roads]] that are maintained properly. Our [[Education in the United States|education system]] would be as good as that of, say, [[South Korea]] or [[Hong Kong]].
**[[Jimmy Carter]] quoted in [https://www.npr.org/2019/04/15/713495558/president-trump-called-former-president-jimmy-carter-to-talk-about-china President Trump Called Former President Jimmy Carter To Talk About China, Emma Hurt, ''NPR''] (April 15, 2019)

*'''We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].'''
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in "[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]", ''The New York Review of Books,'' December 7, 1967.

* ...I don't feel that they deserve a blanket condemnation at all. There are many things to object to in any society. '''But take China, modern China; one also finds many things that are really quite admirable.''' [...] There are even better examples than China. But I do think that '''China is an important example of a new society in which very interesting positive things happened''' at the local level, in which a good deal of the collectivization and communization was really based on mass participation and took place after a level of understanding had been reached in the peasantry that led to this next step.
**[[Noam Chomsky]] [http://www.chomsky.info/debates/19671215.htm The Legitimacy of Violence as a Political Act? Noam Chomsky debates with Hannah Arendt, Susan Sontag, et al.]" in New York, December 15, 1967

* The threat of China is not military. The threat of China is they can't be intimidated... [[Europe]] you can intimidate. When the US tries to get people to stop investing in [[Iran]], European companies pull out, China disregards it. You look at history and understand why — they've been around for 4,000 years, they have contempt for the [[Americans|barbarians]], they just don't give a damn. OK, you scream, we'll go ahead and take over a big piece of [[Saudi Arabia|Saudi]] or Iranian oil. And that's the threat, you can't intimidate them — it's driving people in Washington berserk. But, you know, of all the major powers, they've been the least aggressive militarily.
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quotes in Discussion with [[w:Robert Trivers|Robert Trivers]], September 6, 2006

* China is the center of the Asian energy security grid, which includes the [[w:Central Asia|Central Asian]] states and Russia. India is also hovering around the edge, South Korea is involved, and Iran is an associate member of some kind. If the Middle East oil resources around the Gulf, which are the main ones in the world, if they link up to the Asian grid, the United States is really a second-rate power. A lot is at stake in not withdrawing from Iraq.
**[[Noam Chomsky]] in Interview by Michael Shank in [[w:Foreign Policy In Focus|Foreign Policy In Focus]], February 16, 2007 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070227224657/https://fpif.org/fpiftxt/3999]

*As the most powerful state, the U.S. makes its own laws, using force and conducting [[Economic sanctions|economic warfare]] at will. It also threatens sanctions against countries that do not abide by its conveniently flexible notions of "[[free trade]]." In one important case, [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] has employed such threats with great effectiveness (and [[w:GATT|GATT]] approval) to force open Asian markets for U.S. [[tobacco]] exports and advertising, aimed primarily at the growing markets of women and children. The [[United States Department of Agriculture|U.S. Agriculture Department]] has provided grants to [[Tobacco industry|tobacco firms]] to promote smoking overseas. Asian countries have attempted to conduct educational anti-smoking campaigns, but they are overwhelmed by the miracles of the market, reinforced by U.S. state power through the sanctions threat. [[Philip Morris International|Philip Morris]], with an advertising and promotion budget of close to $9 billion in 1992, became China's largest advertiser. The effect of [[Ronald Reagan|Reaganite]] [[United States sanctions|sanction]] threats was to increase advertising and promotion of cigarette smoking (particularly U.S. brands) quite sharply in Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea, along with the use of these lethal substances. In South Korea, for example, the rate of growth in smoking more than tripled when markets for U.S. lethal drugs were opened in 1988. The [[George H. W. Bush|Bush Administration]] extended the threats to [[Thailand]], at exactly the same time that the "war on drugs" was declared; the media were kind enough to overlook the coincidence, even suppressing the outraged denunciations by the very conservative Surgeon-General. [[University of Oxford|Oxford University]] epidemiologist [[w:Richard Peto|Richard Peto]] estimates that among Chinese children under 20 today, 50 million will die of cigarette-related diseases, an achievement that ranks high even by 20th century standards.
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://chomsky.info/199811__/ The United States and the “Challenge of Relativity” in Tony Evans, ''Human Rights Fifty Years on: A Reappraisal,'' Manchester University Press,] November 1998


* There is a hush over all [[Europe]], nay, over all the world, broken only by the dull thud of [[Japan during World War II|Japanese]] bombs falling on Chinese cities, on Chinese Universities or near British and American ships. But then, China is a long way off, so why worry? The Chinese are fighting for what the [[Founding Fathers of the United States|founders of the American Constitution]] in their stately language called: “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” And they seem to be fighting very well. Many good judges think they are going to win. Anyhow, let’s wish them luck! Let’s give them a wave of encouragement – as [[Franklin D. Roosevelt|your President]] did last week, when he gave notice about ending the commercial treaty. After all, the suffering Chinese are fighting our battle, the battle of [[democracy]]. They are defending the soil, the good earth, that has been theirs since the dawn of time against cruel and unprovoked [[aggression]]. Give them a cheer across the ocean – no one knows whose turn it may be next. If this habit of [[w:Military dictatorships|military dictatorships]]’ breaking into other people’s lands with [[Bombs|bomb]] and [[w:Shell|shell]] and [[w:Bullet|bullet]], stealing the [[property]] and killing the proprietors, spreads too widely, we may none of us be able to think of summer holidays for quite a while.
* There is a hush over all [[Europe]], nay, over all the world, broken only by the dull thud of [[Japan during World War II|Japanese]] bombs falling on Chinese cities, on Chinese Universities or near British and American ships. But then, China is a long way off, so why worry? The Chinese are fighting for what the [[Founding Fathers of the United States|founders of the American Constitution]] in their stately language called: “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” And they seem to be fighting very well. Many good judges think they are going to win. Anyhow, let’s wish them luck! Let’s give them a wave of encouragement – as [[Franklin D. Roosevelt|your President]] did last week, when he gave notice about ending the commercial treaty. After all, the suffering Chinese are fighting our battle, the battle of [[democracy]]. They are defending the soil, the good earth, that has been theirs since the dawn of time against cruel and unprovoked [[aggression]]. Give them a cheer across the ocean – no one knows whose turn it may be next. If this habit of [[w:Military dictatorships|military dictatorships]]’ breaking into other people’s lands with [[Bombs|bomb]] and [[w:Shell|shell]] and [[w:Bullet|bullet]], stealing the [[property]] and killing the proprietors, spreads too widely, we may none of us be able to think of summer holidays for quite a while.
Line 89: Line 44:
*The People's Republic of China is still a [[Marxism|Marxist]], [[Leninist]], [[Maoist]] nation. So, you know, communism is still involved there. They haven't figured their way out of that particularly ideological box yet and that's their misfortune.
*The People's Republic of China is still a [[Marxism|Marxist]], [[Leninist]], [[Maoist]] nation. So, you know, communism is still involved there. They haven't figured their way out of that particularly ideological box yet and that's their misfortune.
**[[Tom Clancy]], on [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html ''Larry King Live Weekend''] (27 August 2000)
**[[Tom Clancy]], on [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html ''Larry King Live Weekend''] (27 August 2000)

*China and [[Iran]] have drafted a “sweeping economic and security partnership,” according to ''[[The New York Times]]''... This “strategic partnership” is the result of [[Donald Trump]]’s punishing [[W: Sanctions against Iran|sanctions against Iran]]... If China and Iran conclude their partnership agreement, Trump would presumably be less likely to use military force against Iran. If he did, he would have to be willing to take on China as well. That would be most unwise.
**[[Marjorie Cohn]], [https://truthout.org/articles/trumps-harsh-sanctions-lead-to-iran-china-partnership/ Trump’s Harsh Sanctions Lead to Iran-China Partnership, ''Truthout''] (13 July 2020)

*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous... the Chinese experiment which has steadily brought a large section of the population into a material abundance which they have never known before. None of the people in China had experienced the quality of life or the material affluence that the eastern seaboard of China now does. Perhaps 20 million people can now experience the material well-being of the more affluent parts of Europe and America. This is altogether new and has alleviated elsewhere in China a tremendous amount of poverty. It is true that there are sections of China which are still poor, but as a whole China has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before... People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|''The World Teacher for All Humanity'']], (2007)

===[[Noam Chomsky]]; [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/23/noam_chomsky_on_bidens_foreign_policy Is China Really a Threat? Noam Chomsky Slams Biden For Increasingly Provocative Actions in Region, ''Democracy Now!''], (November 23, 2021)===
*[[Joe Biden|Biden]] has pretty much picked up [[Donald Trump|Trump]]’s [[Foreign policy of the United States|foreign policy]]... The worst case is the increasing [[W:provocation|provocative]] actions towards [[China]]... there is constant talk about what is called '''the China threat'''. You can read it in sober, reasonable, usually reasonable journals, about the terrible China threat, and that we have to move expeditiously to contain and limit the China threat.... What exactly is the China threat? Actually that question is rarely raised here.... the distinguished statesman, former [Australian] Prime Minister [[Paul Keating]], did have an essay in the Australian press about the China threat. He finally concluded realistically that '''the China threat is China’s existence. The U.S. will not tolerate the existence of a state that cannot be intimidated the way Europe can be, that does not follow U.S. orders the way Europe does but pursues its own course. That is the threat.'''<BR>When we talk about the threat of China, we’re talking about the alleged threats at China’s borders. China does plenty of wrong things, terrible things. You can make many criticisms. But are they a threat?... '''they are not a threat.'''

*Right at the same time as Keating’s article, Australia’s leading military correspondent Brian Toohey, highly knowledgeable, did an assessment of the relative military power of China, in their own region of China and the United States and its allies [[Japan]] and [[Australia]]. It’s laughable. One [[w:U.S. Trident submarine|U.S. Trident submarine]], now being replaced by even more lethal ones — one U.S. submarine can destroy almost 200 cities anywhere in the world with its [[nuclear weapons]]. China in the [[South China Sea]] has four old noisy submarines which can’t even get out because they’re contained by superior U.S. and Allied Force... In the face of this, the United States is sending a fleet of nuclear submarines to Australia. That’s the [[w:AUKUS|AUKUS]] deal—the Australia, U.K., United States—which have no strategic purpose whatsoever.<BR>They will not even be in operation for 15 years, but they do incite China almost certainly to [[Military-industrial complex|build up its lagging military forces,]] increasing the [[Profit|level]] of [[w:Arms industry|confrontation]]. There are problems in the South China Sea that can be met with [[diplomacy]] and [[negotiations]], the regional powers taking the lead, could go into the details. <BR>But the right measure is not increasing provocation, increasing the threat of an accidental development which could lead to devastating, even Earthly-terminal [[nuclear war]]. But that is the direction the Biden administration is following, expansion of the Trump programs. That is the core of their [[Foreign policy of the United States|foreign policy programs]].


===D===
===D===
*The emperor hold upon the Chinamen may be strong, but the Chinaman's hold upon himself is stronger... The Chinaman will not long be willing to wear the cast off shoes of the [[Black people|negro]], and, if he refuses, there will be trouble again. The negro [[Slavery|worked and took his pay in religion and the lash]]. '''The Chinaman is a different article and will want the cash. He may, like the [[Black people|negro]], accept [[Christianity]], but, unlike the negro, he will not care to pay for it in labor. He had the [[Golden Rule]] in substance five hundred years before the coming of [[Christ]]''', and has notions of [[justice]] that are not to be confused by any... Chinese children are in American schools in [[San Francisco]]. None of our children are in Chinese schools, and probably never will be, though in some things they might well teach us valuable lessons. Contact with these yellow children of the Celestial Empire would convince us that the points of human difference, great as they, upon first sight, seem, are as nothing compared with the points of human agreement. Such contact would remove [[Bigotry|mountains of prejudice]]... The Chinese in themselves have first rate recommendations. They are industrious, docile, cleanly, frugal. They are dexterous of hand, patient in toil, marvelously gifted in the power of imitation, and have but few wants.
*Do not take it for granted that China is number two, and do not make the assumption that we will be number one sooner or later.
**[[w:Chen Deming|Chen Deming]], as quoted in [https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opinion/article/3006892/if-china-thinks-its-overtaking-us-any-time-soon-heres-wake-call "If China thinks it’s overtaking the US any time soon, here’s a wake-up call"] (21 April 2019), by Cary Huang, ''This Week in Asia'', SCMP

*The emperor hold upon the Chinamen may be strong, but the Chinaman's hold upon himself is stronger... The Chinaman will not long be willing to wear the cast off shoes of the negro, and, if he refuses, there will be trouble again. The negro [[Slavery|worked and took his pay in religion and the lash]]. '''The Chinaman is a different article and will want the cash. He may, like the [[Black people|negro]], accept [[Christianity]], but, unlike the negro, he will not care to pay for it in labor. He had the [[Golden Rule]] in substance five hundred years before the coming of Christ''', and has notions of [[justice]] that are not to be confused by any... Chinese children are in American schools in [[San Francisco]]. None of our children are in Chinese schools, and probably never will be, though in some things they might well teach us valuable lessons. Contact with these yellow children of the Celestial Empire would convince us that the points of human difference, great as they, upon first sight, seem, are as nothing compared with the points of human agreement. Such contact would remove [[Bigotry|mountains of prejudice]]... The Chinese in themselves have first rate recommendations. They are industrious, docile, cleanly, frugal. They are dexterous of hand, patient in toil, marvelously gifted in the power of imitation, and have but few wants.
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/our-composite-nationality/ ''Our Composite Nationality''] (7 December 1869), Boston, Massachusetts.
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/our-composite-nationality/ ''Our Composite Nationality''] (7 December 1869), Boston, Massachusetts.


*It is objected to the Chinaman that he is secretive and treacherous, and will not tell the truth when he thinks it for his interest to tell a lie. There may be truth in all this; it sounds very much like the account of man’s heart given in the creeds. If he will not tell the truth, except when it is for his interest to do so, let us make it for his interest to tell the truth. We can do it by applying to him the same principle of justice that we apply to ourselves. But I doubt if the Chinese are more untruthful than other people. At this point I have one certain test. '''Mankind are not held together by lies. Trust is the foundation of society. Where there is no truth, there can be no trust, and where there is no trust, there can be no society. Where there is society, there is trust, and where there is trust, there is something upon which it is supported. Now a people who have confided in each other for five thousand years; who have extended their empire in all directions until it embraces one-fifth of the population of the globe; who hold important commercial relations with all nations; who are now entering into treaty stipulations with ourselves, and with all the great European powers, cannot be a nation of cheats and liars''', but must have some respect for [[veracity]]. The very existence of China for so long a period, and her progress in civilization, are proofs of her truthfulness
*It is objected to the Chinaman that he is secretive and treacherous, and will not tell the truth when he thinks it for his interest to tell a lie. There may be truth in all this; it sounds very much like the account of man’s heart given in the creeds. If he will not tell the truth, except when it is for his interest to do so, let us make it for his interest to tell the [[truth]]. We can do it by applying to him the same principle of [[justice]] that we apply to ourselves. But I doubt if the Chinese are more untruthful than other people. At this point I have one certain test. '''Mankind are not held together by lies. [[Trust]] is the foundation of society. Where there is no truth, there can be no trust, and where there is no trust, there can be no society. Where there is society, there is trust, and where there is trust, there is something upon which it is supported. Now a people who have confided in each other for five thousand years; who have extended their empire in all directions until it embraces one-fifth of the population of the globe; who hold important commercial relations with all nations; who are now entering into treaty stipulations with ourselves, and with all the great European powers, cannot be a nation of cheats and liars''', but must have some respect for [[veracity]]. The very existence of China for so long a period, and her progress in civilization, are proofs of her truthfulness
** [[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/our-composite-nationality/ ''Our Composite Nationality''] (7 December 1869), Boston, Massachusetts.
** [[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/our-composite-nationality/ ''Our Composite Nationality''] (7 December 1869), Boston, Massachusetts.


*No victory of arms, or tyranny of alien finance, can long suppress a nation so rich in resources and vitality. '''The invader will lose funds or patience before the loins of China will lose virility; within a century China will have absorbed and civilized her [[conquerors]], and will have learned all the technique of what transiently bears the name of modern industry'''; roads and communications will give her unity, economy and thrift will give her funds, and a strong government will give her order and peace.
*No victory of arms, or tyranny of alien finance, can long suppress a nation so rich in resources and vitality. '''The invader will lose funds or patience before the loins of China will lose virility; within a century China will have absorbed and civilized her [[Western imperialism in Asia|conquerors]], and will have learned all the technique of what transiently bears the name of modern [[industry]]'''; [[Road|roads]] and [[Communication|communications]] will give her unity, economy and thrift will give her funds, and a strong government will give her order and peace.
** [[Will Durant]] and {{w|Ariel Durant}}, ''{{w|The Story of Civilization}}'', Book I, ''Our Oriental Heritage'' (1935) p. 823.
** [[Will Durant]] and {{w|Ariel Durant}}, ''{{w|The Story of Civilization}}'', Book I, ''Our Oriental Heritage'' (1935) p. 823.


Line 121: Line 62:


===E===
===E===
*Even China's population of 1.4 billion would not be enough to fill all the empty apartments littered across the country.
** He Keng, as quoted in {{cite news |title=Even China's 1.4 billion population can't fill all its vacant homes, former official says |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/china/even-chinas-14-bln-population-cant-fill-all-its-vacant-homes-former-official-2023-09-23/ |work=Reuters |date=23 September 2023}}

* Most people with [[Mental health|mental disorders]] in China never receive treatment. There is often a stigma attached to such ailments. Some think that people with [[Psychiatry|psychiatric]] conditions are possessed by evil spirits. Many see [[Mental disorder|mental disorders]] as a sign of [[weakness]], and regard them as socially contagious: a relative of someone with a serious disorder may find it hard to marry. [[Family|Families]] sometimes have their kin treated far away to hide the “shame” of their condition, or keep them hidden at home. Even many medical students worry that those working with psychiatric patients risk catching their disease, says Xu Ni of “It Gets Brighter”, a mental-health [[Non-governmental organization|NGO]] in [[Beijing]].
* Most people with [[Mental health|mental disorders]] in China never receive treatment. There is often a stigma attached to such ailments. Some think that people with [[Psychiatry|psychiatric]] conditions are possessed by evil spirits. Many see [[Mental disorder|mental disorders]] as a sign of [[weakness]], and regard them as socially contagious: a relative of someone with a serious disorder may find it hard to marry. [[Family|Families]] sometimes have their kin treated far away to hide the “shame” of their condition, or keep them hidden at home. Even many medical students worry that those working with psychiatric patients risk catching their disease, says Xu Ni of “It Gets Brighter”, a mental-health [[Non-governmental organization|NGO]] in [[Beijing]].
** ''[[The Economist]]'', [https://www.economist.com/china/2017/01/28/china-wakes-up-to-its-mental-health-problems “China wakes up to its mental-health problems”], (Jan 28th 2017).
** ''[[The Economist]]'', [https://www.economist.com/china/2017/01/28/china-wakes-up-to-its-mental-health-problems “China wakes up to its mental-health problems”], (Jan 28th 2017).


===F===
===F===
*They're not terribly imaginative. They’re not entrepreneurial. They don't innovate. That's why they're stealing our [[intellectual property]].
*They're not terribly [[Imagination|imaginative]]. They’re not [[Entrepreneurs|entrepreneurial]]. They don't [[Innovation|innovate]]. That's why they're stealing our [[intellectual property]].
**[[Carly Fiorina]], as quoted in "Carly Fiorina Calls The Chinese Unimaginative Idea Thieves", by Lydia O'Connor, ''The Huffington Post'' (25 May 2015).
**[[Carly Fiorina]], as quoted in "Carly Fiorina Calls The Chinese Unimaginative Idea Thieves", by Lydia O'Connor, ''The Huffington Post'' (25 May 2015).


Line 131: Line 75:
** {{w|Charles Patrick Fitzgerald}}, ''China: A Short Cultural History'' (1965).
** {{w|Charles Patrick Fitzgerald}}, ''China: A Short Cultural History'' (1965).


* [[w:Economy of China#Development|[Chinese development]] has its roots in the [[w:Chinese Communist Revolution|1949 Chinese Revolution]], carried out by the [[Chinese Communist Party]] headed by [[Mao Zedong]], whereby it liberated itself from the [[Imperialism|imperialist]] system. This allowed it to develop for decades under a [[planned economy]] largely free of constraints from outside forces, establishing a strong [[w:Agriculture in China|agricultural]] and [[w:Industry of China|industrial]] economic base. This was followed by a shift in the [[Chinese economic reform|post-Maoist reform]] period to a [[w:Mixed economy|hybrid system]] of more limited state planning along with a much greater reliance on market relations (and a vast expansion of [[w:National debt of China|debt]] and [[speculation]]) under conditions—the [[globalization]] of the world market—that were particularly fortuitous to its “[[w:Convergence (economics)|catching up]].” Through {{w|trade war}}s and other pressures aimed at destabilizing China’s position in the world market, the [[China–United States relations|United States]] is already [[w:China–United States trade war|seeking to challenge]] the bases of China’s growth in [[w:International trade|world trade]]. China, therefore, stands not so much for the successes of {{w|late capitalism}} but rather for its inherent limitations. The [[w:Socialist market economy|current Chinese model]], moreover, carries within it many of the destructive tendencies of the system of capital accumulation. Ultimately, China’s future too depends on a return to the process of [[w:Revolutionary socialism|revolutionary]] transition, spurred by its own [[w:Demographics of China|population]].
* [[w:Economy of China#Development|[Chinese development]] has its roots in the [[Chinese Civil War|1949 Chinese Revolution]], carried out by the [[Chinese Communist Party]] headed by [[Mao Zedong]], whereby it liberated itself from the [[Imperialism|imperialist]] system. This allowed it to develop for decades under a [[planned economy]] largely free of constraints from outside forces, establishing a strong [[w:Agriculture in China|agricultural]] and [[w:Industry of China|industrial]] economic base. This was followed by a shift in the [[Chinese economic reform|post-Maoist reform]] period to a [[w:Mixed economy|hybrid system]] of more limited state planning along with a much greater reliance on market relations (and a vast expansion of [[w:National debt of China|debt]] and [[speculation]]) under conditions—the [[globalization]] of the world market—that were particularly fortuitous to its “[[w:Convergence (economics)|catching up]].” Through [[China–United States trade war|trade wars]] and other pressures aimed at destabilizing China’s position in the world market, the [[China–United States relations|United States]] is already [[w:China–United States trade war|seeking to challenge]] the bases of China’s growth in [[w:International trade|world trade]]. China, therefore, stands not so much for the successes of {{w|late capitalism}} but rather for its inherent limitations. The [[w:Socialist market economy|current Chinese model]], moreover, carries within it many of the destructive tendencies of the system of capital accumulation. Ultimately, China’s future too depends on a return to the process of [[w:Revolutionary socialism|revolutionary]] transition, spurred by its own [[w:Demographics of China|population]].
** [[John Bellamy Foster]], ''[https://monthlyreview.org/2019/02/01/capitalism-has-failed-what-next/ Capitalism Has Failed—What Next?]'' (February 01, 2019), ''{{w|Monthly Review}}''
** [[John Bellamy Foster]], ''[https://monthlyreview.org/2019/02/01/capitalism-has-failed-what-next/ Capitalism Has Failed—What Next?]'' (February 01, 2019), ''{{w|Monthly Review}}''


Line 139: Line 83:
===G===
===G===


* But [[Democracy|democracies]] also took root because they generally outperformed [[Dictatorship|autocracies]] in raising living standards. [[Market|Markets]] do not always require democracy in order to function: [[South Korea]], [[Taiwan]], [[Singapore]], and China all developed successful economies under less than democratic conditions. The [[Cold War]] experience showed, though, that it is not easy to keep [[Market|markets]] open and ideas constrained at the same time. And since markets proved more efficient than [[Planned economy|command economies]] in allocating resources and enhancing [[productivity]], the resulting improvement in people s lives, in turn, strengthened democracies.
*China’s capacity to meet new demands for agricultural products has been assessed by analysts inside and outside China since the 1980s. [[Economist|Economists]] have anticipated that market forces would induce China to import [[Grain|grains]] and other land-intensive crops, but Chinese officials (motivated by food security and other concerns) have long resisted these forces and sought to maintain [[self-sufficiency]]. However, officials are now adjusting their strategies to accommodate their country’s growing reliance on agricultural imports.
** [[John Lewis Gaddis]], ''The Cold War: A New History,'' pp. 265 (2006)

*China’s capacity to meet new demands for [[Agriculture|agricultural]] products has been assessed by analysts inside and outside China since the 1980s. [[Economist|Economists]] have anticipated that market forces would induce China to import [[Grain|grains]] and other land-intensive crops, but Chinese officials (motivated by food security and other concerns) have long resisted these forces and sought to maintain [[self-sufficiency]]. However, officials are now adjusting their strategies to accommodate their country’s growing reliance on agricultural imports.
**Fred Gale, James Hansen, and Michael Jewison, [http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/1784488/eib136.pdf "China's Growing Demand for Agricultural Imports"] (February 2015), ''United States Department of Agriculture''.
**Fred Gale, James Hansen, and Michael Jewison, [http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/1784488/eib136.pdf "China's Growing Demand for Agricultural Imports"] (February 2015), ''United States Department of Agriculture''.


Line 149: Line 96:
** [[Terry Glavin]], speaking about the {{w|judicial system of China}}. [http://www.macleans.ca/politics/china-is-no-friend-to-canada/ "China is no Friend to Canada"] (2017), ''MacLeans''
** [[Terry Glavin]], speaking about the {{w|judicial system of China}}. [http://www.macleans.ca/politics/china-is-no-friend-to-canada/ "China is no Friend to Canada"] (2017), ''MacLeans''


* The Chinese are emphatically not a religious people, though they are very [[Superstition|superstitious]]. Belief in a God has come down from the remotest ages, but the old simple creed has been so overlaid by [[Buddhism]] as not to be discernible at the present day. Buddhism is now the dominant religion of China. It is closely bound up with the lives of the people, and is a never-failing refuge in sickness or worldly trouble. It is no longer the subtle doctrine which was originally presented to the people of India, but something much more clearly defined and appreciable by the plainest intellect. [[Gautama Buddha|Buddha]] is the saviour of the people through righteousness alone, and Buddhist saints are popularly supposed to possess intercessory powers. Yet reverence is always wanting; and crowds will laugh and talk, and buy and sell sweetmeats, in a Buddhist temple, before the very eyes of the most sacred images. So long as divine intervention is not required, an ordinary Chinaman is content to neglect his divinities; but no sooner does sickness or financial trouble come upon the family, than he will hurry off to propitiate the gods. <br /> He accomplishes this through the aid of the priests, who receive his offerings of money, and light candles or incense at the shrine of the deity to be invoked. Buddhist priests are not popular with the Chinese, who make fun of their shaven heads, and doubt the sincerity of their convictions as well as the purity of their lives. "No meat nor wine may enter here" is a legend inscribed at the gate of most Buddhist temples, the ordinary diet as served in the refectory being strictly vegetarian. A tipsy priest, however, is not an altogether unheard-of combination, and has provided more than one eminent artist with a subject of an interesting picture.
* The Chinese are emphatically not a religious people, though they are very [[Superstition|superstitious]]. Belief in a [[Deity|God]] has come down from the remotest ages, but the old simple creed has been so overlaid by [[Buddhism]] as not to be discernible at the present day. Buddhism is now the dominant religion of China. It is closely bound up with the lives of the people, and is a never-failing refuge in sickness or worldly trouble. It is no longer the subtle doctrine which was originally presented to the people of India, but something much more clearly defined and appreciable by the plainest [[intellect]]. [[Gautama Buddha|Buddha]] is the saviour of the people through righteousness alone, and Buddhist saints are popularly supposed to possess intercessory powers. Yet reverence is always wanting; and crowds will laugh and talk, and buy and sell sweetmeats, in a Buddhist temple, before the very eyes of the most sacred images. So long as divine intervention is not required, an ordinary Chinaman is content to neglect his divinities; but no sooner does sickness or financial trouble come upon the family, than he will hurry off to propitiate the gods. <br /> He accomplishes this through the aid of the priests, who receive his offerings of money, and light candles or incense at the shrine of the deity to be invoked. Buddhist priests are not popular with the Chinese, who make fun of their shaven heads, and doubt the sincerity of their convictions as well as the purity of their lives. "No meat nor wine may enter here" is a legend inscribed at the gate of most Buddhist temples, the ordinary diet as served in the refectory being strictly vegetarian. A tipsy priest, however, is not an altogether unheard-of combination, and has provided more than one eminent artist with a subject of an interesting picture.
** [[w:Herbert Giles|Herbert Allen Giles]], in [https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2076/2076-h/2076-h.htm ''The Civilization of China'' (1911)], Chapter III : Religion and Superstition
** [[w:Herbert Giles|Herbert Allen Giles]], in [https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2076/2076-h/2076-h.htm ''The Civilization of China'' (1911)], Chapter III : Religion and Superstition


* Let us now pause to take stock of some of the results which have accrued from the operation and influence of Confucianism during such a long period, and over such swarming myriads of the human race. It is a commonplace in the present day to assert that the Chinese are hardworking, thrifty, and sober—the last-mentioned, by the way, in a land where [[drunkenness]] is not regarded as a crime. Shallow observers of the globe-trotter type, who have had their pockets picked by professional [[Theft|thieves]] in Hong-Kong, and even resident observers who have not much cultivated their powers of observation and comparison, will assert that honesty is a virtue denied to the Chinese; but those who have lived long in China and have more seriously devoted themselves to discover the truth, may one and all be said to be arrayed upon the other side. The amount of solid honesty to be met with in every class, except the professionally criminal class, is simply astonishing. That the word of the Chinese [[merchant]] is as good as his bond has long since become a household word, and so it is in other walks of life.
* Let us now pause to take stock of some of the results which have accrued from the operation and influence of [[Confucianism]] during such a long period, and over such swarming myriads of the human race. It is a commonplace in the present day to assert that the Chinese are hardworking, thrifty, and sober—the last-mentioned, by the way, in a land where [[drunkenness]] is not regarded as a crime. Shallow observers of the globe-trotter type, who have had their pockets picked by professional [[Theft|thieves]] in [[British Hong Kong|Hong-Kong]], and even resident observers who have not much cultivated their powers of observation and comparison, will assert that honesty is a virtue denied to the Chinese; but those who have lived long in China and have more seriously devoted themselves to discover the truth, may one and all be said to be arrayed upon the other side. The amount of solid honesty to be met with in every class, except the professionally criminal class, is simply astonishing. That the word of the Chinese [[merchant]] is as good as his bond has long since become a household word, and so it is in other walks of life.
** Herbert Allen Giles, in ''The Civilization of China'' (1911), Chapter III : Religion and Superstition
** Herbert Allen Giles, in ''The Civilization of China'' (1911), Chapter III : Religion and Superstition

*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, ''Tehran Times''], December 5, 2021


*[N]early every political evil can be found on display in China: [[slavery]], [[discrimination]], [[w:Religious persecution|religious persecution]], [[xenophobia]], [[tyranny]], mass-political [[indoctrination]], [[colonialism]], [[w:Cultural genocide|cultural genocide]], and so on. And yet, the outcry against these things in [[United States|America]] and the West is a tiny fraction of what it was with regard to [[South Africa]] in the [[1980s]] or [[Israel]] today. Why? Some of the political answers are pretty obvious — and have much merit. A few that come to mind: China is non-Western, and many of these sins are supposed to be unique to [[White people|white]] [[Europe|Europeans]]; China is a victim (or “victim”) of [[colonialism]], and so we shouldn’t judge it harshly; China is very powerful, and [[realpolitik]] dictates that we be diplomatic; and so on. But there’s another reason. As you may have noticed, I’ve become much more interested in [[evolutionary psychology]] of late, particularly the topic of coalitional instincts. The coalition instinct is the programming that helped us form strategic groups that advance our self-interest. We are a social species and cooperation is what helped us skyrocket to the top of the [[w:Food chain|food chain]].
*[N]early every political evil can be found on display in China: [[slavery]], [[discrimination]], [[w:Religious persecution|religious persecution]], [[xenophobia]], [[tyranny]], mass-political [[indoctrination]], [[colonialism]], [[w:Cultural genocide|cultural genocide]], and so on. And yet, the outcry against these things in [[United States|America]] and the West is a tiny fraction of what it was with regard to [[South Africa]] in the [[1980s]] or [[Israel]] today. Why? Some of the political answers are pretty obvious — and have much merit. A few that come to mind: China is non-Western, and many of these sins are supposed to be unique to [[White people|white]] [[Europe|Europeans]]; China is a victim (or “victim”) of [[colonialism]], and so we shouldn’t judge it harshly; China is very powerful, and [[realpolitik]] dictates that we be diplomatic; and so on. But there’s another reason. As you may have noticed, I’ve become much more interested in [[evolutionary psychology]] of late, particularly the topic of coalitional instincts. The coalition instinct is the programming that helped us form strategic groups that advance our self-interest. We are a social species and cooperation is what helped us skyrocket to the top of the [[w:Food chain|food chain]].
Line 165: Line 109:
** [[Stephen Hadley]], [http://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/americas-role-world-stephen-j-hadley "America's Role In The World"] (30 October 2014), ''Lowy Institute''.
** [[Stephen Hadley]], [http://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/americas-role-world-stephen-j-hadley "America's Role In The World"] (30 October 2014), ''Lowy Institute''.


* As a foreign [[literature]] it is studied also by the [[Koreans|Coreans]], the [[Japan|Japanese]], and the [[Vietnam|Annamites]]; and it may therefore be quite appropriately called the Classic Literature of the Far East. The civilization of all these nations has been affected by its study, perhaps even in a higher degree than that of the nations of Europe has been by the literatures of [[Ancient Greece|Greece]] and [[Roman Empire|Rome]]. Millions received from it, in the course of centuries, their mental training. The Chinese who created it have through it perpetuated their national character and imparted some of their idiosyncrasies of thought to their formerly illiterate neighbors.
* We are also seeing a diffusion of power and competition at the [[Nation-state|nation state]] level. This competition comes not just from [[Russia]] and China, but also from emerging countries like [[Brazil]], [[India]], [[Indonesia]], and the other [[w:ASEAN|ASEAN]] states. These states are also beginning to organize themselves into structures outside of and somewhat in competition... We must find a way to convince the [[w:Shanghai Cooperation Organization|SCO]] and [[New Development Bank|BRICS]] institutions to see themselves not as competitors but as collaborators and partners with the rest of us. The role of China will be key in this effort. Neither China nor the United States can solve global challenges by themselves. And both China and the United States need progress in meeting these challenges if they are to achieve their own objectives for the development and economic well being of their people. A way must be found for the United States and China to work together with the rest of the international community to meet the global challenges we face.
** [[w:Friedrich Hirth|Friedrich Hirth]], Columbia University Professor of Chinese, "Chinese Literature" in [[s:Lectures on Literature (1911)|Lectures on Literature]] (1911), [[s:Page:Columbia University Lectures on Literature (1911).djvu/81|page 67]]
**[[w:Stephen J. Hadley|Stephen J. Hadley]], [http://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/americas-role-world-stephen-j-hadley "America's Role In The World"] (30 October 2014), ''Lowy Institute''.


*I did feel that I was going back to a place that I had never been.
* Asia now stands at the dawn a new history of civilization to create its own future, finally emerging from the long tunnel of 150 years of westernization and overcoming the ideological conflicts of the [[20th century|twentieth century]]. Having achieved advanced [[industrialization]] based on [[Free market|market economics]] in the latter half of the twentieth century, the region is now home to some 900 million people in the middle class and about 1.1 billion 'netizens' connected by the [[Internet]]. Within certain East Asian countries, civil society and [[democracy]] are flourishing. Now, China and the [[w:ASEAN|ASEAN]] nations are progressing on their own courses. East Asia is on the verge of birthing a new era marked by [[civil society]] and [[democracy]].
**[[Maxine Hong Kingston]] on visiting China the first time, in ''Conversations with Maxine Hong Kingston'' edited by Paul Skenazy and Tera Martin (1998)
**[[w:Stephan Haggard|Stephan Haggard]] and [[w:Marcus Noland|Marcus Noland]] [http://blogs.piie.com/nk/?p=14403 "2015 Joint Statement by Korean, Japanese and International Scholars: For East Asia's 'Freedom from the Past'"] (20 August 2015), ''Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics''.

* As a foreign [[literature]] it is studied also by the [[Koreans|Coreans]], the [[Japan|Japanese]], and the [[Vietnam|Annamites]]; and it may therefore be quite appropriately called the Classic Literature of the Far East. The civilization of all these nations has been affected by its study, perhaps even in a higher degree than that of the nations of Europe has been by the literatures of [[Greece]] and [[Roman Empire|Rome]]. Millions received from it, in the course of centuries, their mental training. The Chinese who created it have through it perpetuated their national character and imparted some of their idiosyncrasies of thought to their formerly illiterate neighbors.
** [[w:Friedrich Hirth|Friedrich Hirth]], Columbia University Professor of Chinese, "Chinese Literature" in [[s:Lectures on Literature (1911)|Lectures on Literature]] (1911), [[s:Page:Columbia University Lectures on Literature (1911).djvu/81|page 67]]


* The Chinese are industrious, courageous, honest, and intelligent. They created the splendid [[w:Ancient China|ancient Chinese]] civilization, and today, they're firmly committed to the path of peaceful development and are making continuous progress in the modernization drive by carrying out the reform and opening up program.
* The Chinese are industrious, courageous, honest, and intelligent. They created the splendid [[w:Ancient China|ancient Chinese]] civilization, and today, they're firmly committed to the path of peaceful development and are making continuous progress in the modernization drive by carrying out the reform and opening up program.
Line 180: Line 121:
** [[Hu Jintao|Jintao Hu]], [http://listenonrepeat.com/watch/?v=7aE66iIUi9U#David_Shambaugh_-_China_Goes_Global%3A_The_Partial_Power address to the 17th Chinese Communist Party Congress] (2008)
** [[Hu Jintao|Jintao Hu]], [http://listenonrepeat.com/watch/?v=7aE66iIUi9U#David_Shambaugh_-_China_Goes_Global%3A_The_Partial_Power address to the 17th Chinese Communist Party Congress] (2008)


* When China sends its students to the United States, especially when it sends [[w:Central_bank|central bankers]] and [[Planned economy|planners]] to the United States to study (and be recruited), they are told by the U.S. “Do as we say, not as we have done.” The United States is not telling China... how to get rich in the way that it did, by protective tariffs, by creating its own money and by making other countries dependent on it. The United States does not want you to be independent and self-reliant. The United States wants China to let itself become dependent on U.S. finance in order to invest in its own industry... The neoliberal plan is not to make you independent, and not to help you grow except to the extent that your growth will be paid to US investors or used to finance U.S. military spending around the world to encircle you and trying to destabilize you in [[w:Sichuan|Sichuan]] to try to pry China apart. Look at what the United States has done in Russia, and at what the [[International Monetary Fund]] in Europe has done to [[Greece]], [[Latvia]] and the [[w:Baltic_states|Baltic states]]. It is a dress rehearsal for what [[Foreign policy of the United States|U.S. diplomacy]] would like to do to you, if it can convince you to follow the neoliberal US economic policy of financialization and [[privatization]]. De-dollarization is the alternative to privatization and financialization.
* When China sends its students to the [[United States]], especially when it sends [[w:Central_bank|central bankers]] and [[Planned economy|planners]] to the United States to study (and be recruited), they are told by the U.S. “Do as we say, not as we have done.” The United States is not telling China... how to get rich in the way that it did, by protective tariffs, by creating its own money and by making other countries dependent on it. The United States does not want you to be independent and self-reliant. The United States wants China to let itself become dependent on U.S. finance in order to [[Investment|invest]] in its own industry... The [[Neoliberalism|neoliberal]] plan is not to make you independent, and not to help you grow except to the extent that your growth will be paid to US investors or used to finance U.S. military spending around the world to encircle you and trying to destabilize you in [[w:Sichuan|Sichuan]] to try to pry China apart. Look at what the United States has done in Russia, and at what the [[International Monetary Fund]] in [[Europe]] has done to [[Greece]], [[Latvia]] and the [[w:Baltic_states|Baltic states]]. It is a dress rehearsal for what [[Foreign policy of the United States|U.S. diplomacy]] would like to do to you, if it can convince you to follow the neoliberal US economic policy of financialization and [[privatization]]. De-dollarization is the alternative to privatization and financialization.
** [https://michael-hudson.com/2020/01/note-to-china/ Michael Hudson, Note to China], (14 January 2020)
** [https://michael-hudson.com/2020/01/note-to-china/ Michael Hudson, Note to China], (14 January 2020)


* The [[China–United States relations|U.S.-China confrontation]] is not simply a national rivalry, but a conflict of [[Economic system|economic]] and [[Social system|social systems]].... From today’s U.S. vantage point... China and Russia are existential threats to the global expansion of financialized rentier wealth. Today’s [[Cold War II|Cold War 2.0]] aims to deter China and potentially other counties from socializing their financial systems, land and natural resources, and keeping infrastructure utilities public to prevent their being [[Monopoly|monopolized]] in private hands to siphon off [[w:Economic_rent|economic rents]] at the expense of productive investment in [[economic growth]]. The United States hoped that China might be as gullible as the [[Soviet Union]] and adopt neoliberal policy permitting its wealth to be privatized and turned into rent-extracting privileges, to be sold off to Americans.
* So the question is, how do China, Russia, Iran and other countries break free of this U.S. dollarization strategy? As now constituted, dollarization creates a circular flow that finances American military spending by forcing the costs onto foreign central banks holding [[Dollar|dollars]]. The solution obviously is to avoid using dollars in order to break free of American control of your economy. To do this, you have to have a non-Dollar currency. This currency alternative has to be large enough to have a critical mass, so that it can be used internationally. That’s why China, Russia, Iran and their allies are trying to create their own currency area, incorporating largely the [[W:Shanghai Cooperation Organization|Shanghai Cooperation Organization]].
** [https://michael-hudson.com/2020/01/note-to-china/ Michael Hudson, Note to China], (14 January 2020)

* The U.S.-China confrontation is not simply a national rivalry, but a conflict of economic and social systems.... From today’s U.S. vantage point... China and Russia are existential threats to the global expansion of financialized rentier wealth. Today’s [[Cold War II|Cold War 2.0]] aims to deter China and potentially other counties from socializing their financial systems, land and natural resources, and keeping infrastructure utilities public to prevent their being monopolized in private hands to siphon off economic rents at the expense of productive investment in economic growth. The United States hoped that China might be as gullible as the Soviet Union and adopt neoliberal policy permitting its wealth to be privatized and turned into rent-extracting privileges, to be sold off to Americans.
** [https://michael-hudson.com/2021/04/americas-neoliberal-financialization-policy-vs-chinas-industrial-socialism/ Michael Hudson, America’s Neoliberal Financialization Policy vs. China’s Industrial Socialism,] (14 April 2021)
** [https://michael-hudson.com/2021/04/americas-neoliberal-financialization-policy-vs-chinas-industrial-socialism/ Michael Hudson, America’s Neoliberal Financialization Policy vs. China’s Industrial Socialism,] (14 April 2021)


* '''China, like Russia, has been reducing its dollar holdings as much as possible, just keeping enough to prevent the currency from being destabilized by the dollar inflows. China, Russia are buying gold instead of U.S. dollars as much as possible.''' China is trying to escape from buying Treasury securities. Why would any government want to buy Treasury securities yielding 0.1% when the dollars coming into China are trying to make loans or buying countries, making 15% profit or interest a year? Nobody would want that situation to continue. China doesn’t want it to continue. As long as it [China] is part of an international economy that is dollarized, it [China] is forced to take a loss, a sacrifice, year after year, subsidizing the U.S. economy. The only way that it can avoid that is to isolate itself from the U.S. dollar. No country until this time since 1945 has ever had the critical mass to be able to do it. That is the objective, the stated objective of Russia, China and their allies. Of course, they don’t want to buy treasury bills. That doesn’t mean that, yes, they found a wonderful investment making 0.1% a year and subsidizing the United States. That is not what China or any other country wants.
* '''China, like Russia, has been reducing its dollar holdings as much as possible, just keeping enough to prevent the currency from being destabilized by the dollar inflows. China, Russia are buying [[gold]] instead of U.S. dollars as much as possible.''' China is trying to escape from buying Treasury securities. Why would any government want to buy Treasury securities yielding 0.1% when the dollars coming into China are trying to make loans or buying countries, making 15% profit or interest a year? Nobody would want that situation to continue. China doesn’t want it to continue. As long as it [China] is part of an international economy that is dollarized, it [China] is forced to take a loss, a sacrifice, year after year, subsidizing the U.S. economy. The only way that it can avoid that is to isolate itself from the U.S. dollar. No country until this time since 1945 has ever had the critical mass to be able to do it. That is the objective, the stated objective of Russia, China and their allies. Of course, they don’t want to buy treasury bills. That doesn’t mean that, yes, they found a wonderful investment making 0.1% a year and subsidizing the United States. That is not what China or any other country wants.
**[https://michael-hudson.com/2022/04/china-a-sub-imperial-ally-of-the-west/ Michael Hudson, China – a Sub-Imperial Ally of the West?] (3 April 2022)
**[https://michael-hudson.com/2022/04/china-a-sub-imperial-ally-of-the-west/ Michael Hudson, China – a Sub-Imperial Ally of the West?] (3 April 2022)

* '''With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Presidency of Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon [[Donald Trump|Trump]]’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and [[Russia]]. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed.''' This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, ''CounterPunch''] (12 July 2021)


===I===
===I===
* China seems to have been very much similar to the West, both in the production of [[new religious movement]]s and in attracting to them figures from the political left who were officially promoting the struggle against “superstition.” Reconstructions of “Chinese traditional culture” as “non-religious,” and of the rich Chinese religious pluralism as mere “folk religion” should be viewed as propaganda rather than history.
* China seems to have been very much similar to the West, both in the production of [[new religious movement]]s and in attracting to them figures from the political left who were officially promoting the struggle against “superstition.” Reconstructions of “Chinese traditional culture” as “non-religious,” and of the rich Chinese religious pluralism as mere “folk religion” should be viewed as [[propaganda]] rather than [[history]].
** [[Massimo Introvigne]], [https://bitterwinter.org/new-religious-movements-in-china/ "New Religious Movements in China: They Were Always There"], ''Bitter Winter'' (June 27, 2020)
** [[Massimo Introvigne]], [https://bitterwinter.org/new-religious-movements-in-china/ "New Religious Movements in China: They Were Always There"], ''Bitter Winter'' (June 27, 2020)


===J===
===J===


*China’s battle against [[poverty]] has benefited the largest number of people in human history. To sustain poverty reduction gains, China will focus more on achieving endogenous development in areas that have been lifted out of poverty and introduce vigorous measures to support rural revitalization. Our goal is to achieve common prosperity and high-quality development including through the rural revitalization strategy with a focus in five key areas: [[Industrialization|industry development]], [[human capital]], [[culture]], [[Ecology|ecological environment]] and [[w:Local_government|local governance]].”
*China’s battle against [[poverty]] has benefited the largest number of people in human history. To sustain [[poverty reduction]] gains, China will focus more on achieving endogenous development in areas that have been lifted out of poverty and introduce vigorous measures to support rural revitalization. Our goal is to achieve common prosperity and high-quality development including through the rural revitalization strategy with a focus in five key areas: [[Industrialization|industry development]], [[human capital]], [[culture]], [[Ecology|ecological environment]] and [[w:Local_government|local governance]].”
** [[w:Ma Jiantang|Ma Jiantang]] as quoted in [https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/04/01/lifting-800-million-people-out-of-poverty-new-report-looks-at-lessons-from-china-s-experience World Bank Press Release No. 2022/072/EAP, Lifting 800 Million People Out of Poverty – New Report Looks at Lessons from China’s Experience, April 1, 2022
** [[w:Ma Jiantang|Ma Jiantang]] as quoted in [https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/04/01/lifting-800-million-people-out-of-poverty-new-report-looks-at-lessons-from-china-s-experience World Bank Press Release No. 2022/072/EAP, Lifting 800 Million People Out of Poverty – New Report Looks at Lessons from China’s Experience, April 1, 2022

*The greatest contribution towards the whole of human race, made by China, to prevent its 1.3 billion people from [[hunger]]... There are some foreigners who have eaten their fill and have nothing better to do than point their fingers at our affairs. '''First, China doesn't export Revolution; second, China doesn't export hunger and poverty; third, China doesn't come and cause you headaches, what more is there to be said?'''
**[[Xi Jinping]], in Mexico (11 February 2009), as quoted in [http://news.asiaone.com/News/the%2BStraits%2BTimes/Story/A1Story20090214-121872.html "Chinese V-P blasts meddlesome foreigners"] (14 February 2009), by Sim Chi Yin, ''Asia One News''.
**Also quoted as ''There are some bored foreigners, with full stomachs, who have nothing better to do than point fingers at us. First, China doesn't export revolution. Second, China doesn't export hunger and poverty. Third, China doesn't come and cause you headaches. What more is there to be said?''

[[File:Hu Jintao at White House 2011.jpg|thumb|We are ready to expand the friendly people-to-people exchanges and enhance exchanges and [[cooperation]] in [[science]],[[technology]], [[culture]], [[education]], and other areas... We should... respect each other as [[Equality|equals]] and promote closer exchanges and cooperation. This will enable us to make steady [[progress]] in advancing constructive and cooperative [[China–United States relations|China-U.S. relations]], and bring more benefits to our two peoples and people of the world. ~ [[Hu Jintao]]]]
*We are ready to expand the friendly people-to-people exchanges and enhance exchanges and cooperation in [[science]], [[technology]], [[culture]], [[education]], and other areas... Enhanced interactions and [[cooperation]] between China and the United States serve the interests of our two peoples and are conducive to [[world peace]] and [[development]]. We should stay firmly rooted in the present while looking ahead to the future, and view and approach [[China–United States relations|China-U.S. relations]] from a strategic and long-term perspective. We should, on the basis of the principles set forth in the three Sino-U.S. joint communiqués, respect each other as equals and promote closer exchanges and cooperation. This will enable us to make steady progress in advancing constructive and cooperative China-U.S. relations, and bring more benefits to our two peoples and people of the world.<BR>We are ready to continue to work with the U.S. side and other parties concerned to peacefully resolve the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula, and the Iranian nuclear issue through diplomatic negotiation to uphold the international non-proliferation regime and safeguard global peace and stability.
**[[Hu Jintao]], [https://web.archive.org/web/20130503110022/http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/04/20060420.html White House speech] (20 April 2006)


===K===
===K===
*China is simply too big and too central to be ostracised. My point is that China is now so big and it is going to grow so large, it will have no precedents in modern social economic history.... we haven’t come to a point of accommodation where it acknowledges China’s pre-eminence in east Asia and the Asian mainland, in which case we can start to move towards a sensible relationship again with China.<BR>The key point is – is the rise of China legitimate? Is taking 20 per cent of humanity – 1.4 billion people – from abject poverty something the world should welcome?<BR> And in our terms, it has completely remodelled the [[w:economy of Australia|Australian economy]]. If we give China the recognition I believe it is due in terms of its legitimacy … then I think a lot of these issues, the so-called 14 points, sort of fall off the table.... We have no relationship with Beijing, so why would the Prime Minister of [[Malaysia]] or [[Singapore]] or [[Thailand]] talk to us about east Asia when we are non-speakers with the biggest power, the Chinese?
**[[Paul Keating]], quoted in [https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/the-world-according-to-keating-20211110-p597t1 In the world according to Paul Keating, China deserves respect, Jennifer Hewett, ''Financial Review'',] 10 November 2021


* The Chinese have always struck me as pretty cautious, even crafty, in managing their rise. It's true that they’re a lot more aggressive since 2009, but I don't see them suddenly becoming reckless. I always found that factoid that '''the PRC spends more on internal than external security to be indicative that CCP is, in fact, very insecure at the top. It's got to have an ideology with foreign enemies, otherwise the Chinese people might see the real enemy, the CCP's corruption, rejection of democracy''' and unwillingness to admit the horrors of {{w|Maoism}}.
* The Chinese have always struck me as pretty cautious, even crafty, in managing their rise. It's true that they’re a lot more aggressive since 2009, but I don't see them suddenly becoming reckless. I always found that factoid that '''the PRC spends more on internal than external security to be indicative that CCP is, in fact, very insecure at the top. It's got to have an ideology with foreign enemies, otherwise the Chinese people might see the real enemy, the CCP's [[corruption]], rejection of democracy''' and unwillingness to admit the horrors of {{w|Maoism}}.
** {{w|Robert E. Kelly}}, as quoted in [http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/12/01/national/does-china-adiz-take-focus-off-real-enemy/#.VWG2IE9VhBe "Does China ADIZ take focus off 'real enemy'?: To many experts, Beijing's foreign policy is a byproduct of domestic issues"] (1 December 2013), by [[Max Fisher]], ''The Washington Post''.
** {{w|Robert E. Kelly}}, as quoted in [http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/12/01/national/does-china-adiz-take-focus-off-real-enemy/#.VWG2IE9VhBe "Does China ADIZ take focus off 'real enemy'?: To many experts, Beijing's foreign policy is a byproduct of domestic issues"] (1 December 2013), by [[Max Fisher]], ''The Washington Post''.


*The collapse of U.S. influence over Saudi Arabia and the Kingdom’s new alliances with China and Iran are painful emblems of the abject failure of the Neocon strategy of maintaining U.S. global hegemony with aggressive projections of military power. China has displaced the American Empire by deftly projecting, instead, economic power. Over the past decade, our country has spent trillions bombing roads, ports, bridges, and airports. China spent the equivalent building the same across the developing world.
*The collapse of U.S. influence over Saudi Arabia and the Kingdom’s new alliances with China and Iran are painful emblems of the abject failure of the [[Neoconservatism|Neocon]] strategy of maintaining U.S. global hegemony with aggressive projections of military power. China has displaced the [[American imperialism|American Empire]] by deftly projecting, instead, economic power. Over the past decade, our country has spent trillions bombing roads, ports, bridges, and airports. China spent the equivalent building the same across the developing world.
** [[Robert Francis Kennedy, Jr.]], from [https://www.facebook.com/rfkjr/posts/pfbid0U4onsx8ptxFM9Aa5iy2wXTrYswSHCnqbYAh3yy3RuVdRHuUpBRqjvGH1sz2oqNR1l his post] on Facebook (4 April 2023)
** [[Robert Francis Kennedy, Jr.]], from [https://www.facebook.com/rfkjr/posts/pfbid0U4onsx8ptxFM9Aa5iy2wXTrYswSHCnqbYAh3yy3RuVdRHuUpBRqjvGH1sz2oqNR1l his post] on Facebook (4 April 2023)


* Contemporaneous with the age of Greek culture, while [[Rome]] was yet an infant city and the rest of Europe in a condition of barbarism, the Chinese were a civilised race. Many years before the [[Christianity|Christian]] era they had evolved under the name of Taoism, a set of principles and a mystic teaching based on the writings of [[Laozi|Laotzu]], which formed a not altogether despicable substitute for a [[religion]], while in Confucianism they enjoyed a sound [[philosophy]]. Under these influences the arts of peace gradually achieved the first place among the national ideas. The application of principles of reason to the relationships of daily life, the adjustment of differences by discussion, and the cultivation of respect for age and learning, became cardinal principles.
* Contemporaneous with the age of Greek culture, while [[Rome (ancient city)|Rome]] was yet an infant city and the rest of Europe in a condition of barbarism, the Chinese were a civilised race. Many years before the [[Christianity|Christian]] era they had evolved under the name of Taoism, a set of principles and a mystic teaching based on the writings of [[Laozi|Laotzu]], which formed a not altogether despicable substitute for a [[religion]], while in Confucianism they enjoyed a sound [[philosophy]]. Under these influences the arts of peace gradually achieved the first place among the national ideas. The application of principles of reason to the relationships of daily life, the adjustment of differences by discussion, and the cultivation of respect for age and learning, became cardinal principles.
** Percy Howard Kent, {{cite book|chapter=Chapter 1. The Old Conditions|title=The Passing of the Manchus|page=2|year=1911|chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/cu31924021495258/page/n23/mode/2up}}
** Percy Howard Kent, {{cite book|chapter=Chapter 1. The Old Conditions|title=The Passing of the Manchus|page=2|year=1911|chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/cu31924021495258/page/n23/mode/2up}}


*China believes it is the center of the [[universe]]. Look at its [[Flag of China|flag]]; one big [[Stars|star]] surrounded by [[satellite]] stars. '''Arrogant!'''
*China believes it is the center of the [[universe]]. Look at its [[Flag of China|flag]]; one big [[Stars|star]] surrounded by [[satellite]] stars. '''Arrogant!'''
**[[Nguyen Khanh]], as quoted in [http://web.archive.org/web/20080921114015/http://65.45.193.26:8026/cms/acct/vietweekly/issues/vw3n18/english/bagOfEarth.html "A Bag of Earth, A Promise To Keep"] (28 April 2005), ''Viet Weekly'', by Mike Nally
**[[Nguyen Khanh]], as quoted in [http://web.archive.org/web/20080921114015/http://65.45.193.26:8026/cms/acct/vietweekly/issues/vw3n18/english/bagOfEarth.html "A Bag of Earth, A Promise To Keep"] (28 April 2005), ''Viet Weekly'', by Mike Nally

* [[W:China–Vietnam relations|China presents Vietnam]] with a very big problem. China is taking over [[Vietnam]], from [[W:Cholon, Ho Chi Minh City|Cholon]], where there are rich Chinese, to {{w|Haiphong}}. They are everywhere now with their product. My wife is from the [[w:North Vietnam|North]], people there [[W:Sinophobia|resent China]] more than the [[South Vietnam|South]] feared the {{w|Viet Cong}}. The Chinese are invaders, like any other foreigners, to fight. We must stop the Chinese. You know the dikes built on the [[W:Red River (Asia)|Red River]]? If they break, what happens? A flood!
**[[Nguyen Khanh]], as quoted in [http://web.archive.org/web/20080921114015/http://65.45.193.26:8026/cms/acct/vietweekly/issues/vw3n18/english/bagOfEarth.html "A Bag of Earth, A Promise To Keep"] (28 April 2005), ''Viet Weekly''


*I hear from higher up that China seems to be succeeding on many fronts – [[engineering]], [[commerce]], hotels, [[agriculture]] - everything. '''In many ways, don’t we need to take them as a model example for [[North Korea|us]]?'''
*I hear from higher up that China seems to be succeeding on many fronts – [[engineering]], [[commerce]], hotels, [[agriculture]] - everything. '''In many ways, don’t we need to take them as a model example for [[North Korea|us]]?'''
** [[Kim Jong-un]] as recalled by by household chef Kenji Fujimoto [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-kimjongun-insight/the-thinking-behind-kim-jong-uns-madness-idUSKBN1DU15Y "The thinking behind Kim Jong Un's 'madness'"]
** [[Kim Jong-un]] as recalled by by household chef Kenji Fujimoto [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-kimjongun-insight/the-thinking-behind-kim-jong-uns-madness-idUSKBN1DU15Y "The thinking behind Kim Jong Un's 'madness'"]

* China too faces a [[International relations|world order]] that is new to it. For 2,000 years, the Chinese Empire had united its world under a single imperial rule. To be sure, that rule had faltered at times. [[War|Wars]] occurred in China no less frequently than they did in [[Europe]]. But since they generally took place among contenders for the imperial authority, they were more in the nature of [[Civil war|civil]] rather than [[w:interstate_war|international wars]], and, sooner or later, invariably led to the emergence of some new central power. Before the [[19th century|nineteenth century]], China never had a neighbor capable of contesting its pre-eminence and never imagined that such a state could arise. Conquerors from abroad overthrew Chinese dynasties, only to be absorbed into Chinese culture to such an extent that they continued the traditions of the Middle Kingdom. The notion of the [[Sovereignty|sovereign]] [[equality]] of states did not exist in China; [[Foreigner|outsiders]] were considered [[Barbarian|barbarians]] and were relegated to a tributary relationship—that was how the first [[United Kingdom|British]] envoy to [[Beijing]] was received in the eighteenth century. China disdained sending [[Ambassador|ambassadors]] abroad but was not above using distant barbarians to overcome the ones nearby. Yet this was a strategy for emergencies, not a day-to-day operational system like the European balance of power, and it failed to produce the sort of permanent diplomatic establishment characteristic of Europe. After China became a humiliated subject of [[Western imperialism in Asia|European colonialism]] in the nineteenth century, it re-emerged only recently—since the [[World War II|Second World War]]—into a multipolar world unprecedented in its history.
** [[Henry Kissinger]], ''Diplomacy'' (1994)


*Back in about [[1753]] it took a letter three days to go from [[New York City]] to [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]], and today you can go from here to China in less time than that... Man's scientific genius has been amazing.
*Back in about [[1753]] it took a letter three days to go from [[New York City]] to [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]], and today you can go from here to China in less time than that... Man's scientific genius has been amazing.
Line 239: Line 164:
*If I lived in China or even [[Russia]], or any [[totalitarian]] country, maybe I could understand the denial of certain basic [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|F]]<nowiki/>[[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|irst Amendment]] privileges, because they hadn't committed themselves to that over there.
*If I lived in China or even [[Russia]], or any [[totalitarian]] country, maybe I could understand the denial of certain basic [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|F]]<nowiki/>[[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|irst Amendment]] privileges, because they hadn't committed themselves to that over there.
**[[Martin Luther King, Jr.]], ''[http://mlk-kpp01.stanford.edu/index.php/encyclopedia/documentsentry/ive_been_to_the_mountaintop/ I've Been to the Mountaintop]'' (1968).'
**[[Martin Luther King, Jr.]], ''[http://mlk-kpp01.stanford.edu/index.php/encyclopedia/documentsentry/ive_been_to_the_mountaintop/ I've Been to the Mountaintop]'' (1968).'

*Former president [[Jimmy Carter]] recently made a profound and damning statement — '''the United States is the “most warlike nation in the history of the world.”''' Carter contrasted the United States with [[China]], saying that China is building [[High-speed rail|high-speed trains]] for its people while the United States is putting all of its resources into mass destruction. Where are high-speed trains in the United States, Carter appropriately wondered... As if to prove Carter’s assertion, Vice President [[Mike Pence]] told the most recent graduating class at West Point that it “is a virtual certainty that you will fight on a battlefield for America at some point in your life... You will lead soldiers in combat. It will happen.” Clearly referring to [[Venezuela]], Pence continued, “Some of you may even be called upon to serve in this hemisphere.” In other words, Pence declared, [[war]] is inevitable, a certainty for this country.
**[https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2019/07/01/must-stop-our-nation-push-for-relentless-war/Oe1EOC1wbv8Jca6FSuXSzK/story.html ''We must stop our nation’s push for relentless war'' By [[Oliver Stone]] and [[Daniel Kovalik|Daniel Kovalik]], ''Boston Globe'',] (July 1, 2019)


==== [https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/nov/10/it-would-make-a-cat-laugh-key-moments-from-paul-keatings-national-press-club-appearance 'It would make a cat laugh’: key moments from Paul Keating’s National Press Club appearance, ''The Guardian''] (November 10, 2021)====
<small>[[https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/in-full-paul-keating-addresses-national-press-club-of-australia/video/3690b46dc983b8774ff223b230c6ab10 In Full: Paul Keating addresses National Press Club of Australia, Sky News Australia]]</small>

*'''Taiwan is not a vital Australian interest.''' We have no alliance with [[Taipei]]. There is no piece of paper sitting in Canberra which has an alliance with Taipei. We do not recognise it as a [[Sovereignty|sovereign]] state – '''we’ve always seen it as a part of China...''' My view is Australia should not be drawn into a military engagement over Taiwan, US-sponsored or otherwise...

* (On rebuilding relationships with Beijing) At least give it respect. What the Chinese want, I think, is [[Respect|respect]] for what they’ve created. Our central proposition should be that the rise of China is entirely valid. What the Chinese want is acknowledgement of the validity of what they have done and what they have created: the legitimacy of the rise of China from its colonial past and from poverty.

*(On Xi as president for life: ‘A belief in harmony’) Well, it’s a good way to stay in power, I guess. It’s not my way. I actually believe in a community’s right to dismiss the government. But you’ve got to remember that China is broadly a [[Confucius|Confucian society]] that believes in harmony, in authority, and it is with this background that it accepts, I think broadly, the role of the [[W:Chinese Communist party|Chinese Communist party]]. I mean, the idea that we have that if you don’t vote at the local ballot box, that is, if you are not a [[Thomas Jefferson|Jeffersonian]] [[Liberalism|liberal]], then you are a savage, belies the fact that China has a 4,000-year history which has these characteristics about it.

*(On Britain’s tilt to the Indo-Pacific: ‘Old theme park’) You know, here’s our old friend – what’s his name – [[Boris Johnson|the British prime minister]] waxing lyrical down there in [[Cornwall]]. I mean, '''[[United Kingdom|Britain]] is like an old theme park sliding into the Atlantic compared to modern China. China is just going to be huge.'''

*In October 2020, the IMF in its annual report nominated China as the world’s largest economy. '''It says '''[[Economy of China|China’s economy]] is now 20% larger than the [[Economy of the United States|United States]]''', 24tn versus 20tn – a report which was endorsed by the CIA. So you have the IMF and the CIA out there saying China is 20% bigger than the United States now.''' These are the key numbers. American GDP per capita is $60,000. China’s GDP per capita is $10,000. But as China is moving out of its old model of cheap manufactured goods, their income is going to rise. But at 10,000 US dollars per capita, China is 20% bigger than the US. How many years is it going to take China to get to 20,000? Not 60 … but with the highly urbanised economy of theirs, it will take a decade, perhaps. If it gets to $20,000 US per capita, '''it will be 2.5 times bigger than the United States'''. To which the United States says: “That is all very interesting but, look, if you behave yourselves, you Chinese, you can be a stakeholder in our system.” And you would not have to be Xi Jinping to take the view, if you are a [[w:Chinese_nationalism|Chinese nationalist]], '''“let me get this right, we are already 1.25 times bigger than you, we will soon be twice as big as you and we may be 2.5 times as big as you, but we can be a stakeholder in your system, is that it?” It would make a cat laugh.'''

*(China debate ‘informed by the spooks’) Australian public debate is [[deception|informed]] by the spooks. Our [[foreign policy]] debate now in [[Canberra]] is informed by the security agencies, so you are not getting a macro view of China [[truth|as it really is]]. <BR>China wants its front doorstep and its front porch, that is Taiwan, its sea, it doesn’t want American naval forces influencing that. It wants access out of its coast into the deeper waters of the Mariana Trench in the Pacific. That’s what it’s about fundamentally.


=== M ===
=== M ===


* To understand the changes which now appear upon the Chinese mainland, one must understand the changes in Chinese character and culture over the past 50 years. China, up to 50 years ago, was completely non-homogenous, being compartmented into groups divided against each other. The war-making tendency was almost non-existent, as they still followed the tenets of the Confucian ideal of [[Pacifism|pacifist]] culture. At the turn of the century, under the regime of [[w:Zhang Zuolin|Chang Tso Lin]], efforts toward greater homogeneity produced the start of a [[Nationalism|nationalist]] urge. This was further and more successfully developed under the leadership of [[Chiang Kai-shek|Chiang Kai-Shek]], but has been brought to its greatest fruition under the present regime to the point that it has now taken on the character of a united nationalism of increasingly dominant, aggressive tendencies. Through these past 50 years the Chinese people have thus become militarized in their concepts and in their ideals. They now constitute excellent soldiers, with competent staffs and commanders. This has produced a new and dominant power in [[Asia]], which, for its own purposes, is allied with [[Soviet Union|Soviet Russia]] but which in its own concepts and methods has become aggressively imperialistic, with a lust for expansion and increased power normal to this type of [[imperialism]]. There is little of the ideological concept either one way or another in the Chinese make-up. The standard of living is so low and the capital accumulation has been so thoroughly dissipated by war that the masses are desperate and eager to follow any leadership which seems to promise the alleviation of local stringencies. I have from the beginning believed that the Chinese Communists' support of the [[North Korea|North Koreans]] was the dominant one. Their interests are, at present, parallel with those of the [[Soviet Union|Soviet]]. But I believe that the aggressiveness recently displayed not only in Korea but also in Indo-China and [[Tibet]] and pointing potentially toward the South reflects predominantly the same lust for the expansion of power which has animated every would-be conqueror since the beginning of time.
* To understand the changes which now appear upon the Chinese mainland, one must understand the changes in Chinese character and culture over the past 50 years. China, up to 50 years ago, was completely non-homogenous, being compartmented into groups divided against each other. The war-making tendency was almost non-existent, as they still followed the tenets of the Confucian ideal of [[Pacifism|pacifist]] culture. At the turn of the century, under the regime of [[w:Zhang Zuolin|Chang Tso Lin]], efforts toward greater homogeneity produced the start of a [[Nationalism|nationalist]] urge. This was further and more successfully developed under the leadership of [[Chiang Kai-shek|Chiang Kai-Shek]], but has been brought to its greatest fruition under the present regime to the point that it has now taken on the character of a united nationalism of increasingly dominant, aggressive tendencies. Through these past 50 years the Chinese people have thus become militarized in their concepts and in their ideals. They now constitute excellent soldiers, with competent staffs and commanders. This has produced a new and dominant power in [[Asia]], which, for its own purposes, is allied with [[Soviet Union|Soviet Russia]] but which in its own concepts and methods has become aggressively imperialistic, with a lust for expansion and increased power normal to this type of [[imperialism]]. There is little of the ideological concept either one way or another in the Chinese make-up. The standard of living is so low and the capital accumulation has been so thoroughly dissipated by war that the masses are desperate and eager to follow any leadership which seems to promise the alleviation of local stringencies. I have from the beginning believed that the Chinese Communists' support of the [[North Korea|North Koreans]] was the dominant one. Their interests are, at present, parallel with those of the [[Soviet Union|Soviet]]. But I believe that the aggressiveness recently displayed not only in [[Korean War|Korea]] but also in Indo-China and [[Tibet]] and pointing potentially toward the South reflects predominantly the same lust for the expansion of power which has animated every would-be conqueror since the beginning of time.
** [[Douglas MacArthur]], [https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/douglasmacarthurfarewelladdress.htm 1953 Farewell Speech]
** [[Douglas MacArthur]], [https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/douglasmacarthurfarewelladdress.htm 1953 Farewell Speech]
*By contrast, classical China produced many great generals, fought many wars and conquered many peoples but did not elevate military values above civilian. (It helped, perhaps, that the scholars rather than the military wrote the histories.) Fighting was not held up as something admirable but rather as the result of a breakdown in order and propriety. There is no equivalent of the ''[[Iliad]]'' in [[Chinese literature]] and the heroes held up for the young to emulate were the great [[Bureaucracy|bureaucrats]] and wise rulers who maintained the peace. Early on Chinese thinkers such as Confucius and the great strategist [[Sun Tzu|Sunzi]] (also known in the transliteration Sun Tzu) stressed that the state’s authority rested on its virtue as well as on its ability to use force. And for Sunzi, the greatest general was the one who could win a war, through manoeuvre or trickery, without fighting a battle. Prestige in Chinese society came rather from being a [[Scholarship|scholar]], [[Poets|poet]] or [[Painting|painter]]; and from the [[w:Tang_dynasty|Tang dynasty]] onwards the [[w:imperial_examination|examination system]] to enter the imperial civil service was the favoured path for fame and prestige. Successful generals were sometimes awarded a scholar’s rank and gown as a mark of particular favour where many European societies would have given military decorations to meritorious civilians. Societies’ values can change over time, of course. [[Swedes|Swedish]] [[soldiers]] were once the terror of [[Europe]] when now we associate [[Sweden]] with the [[w:Nobel_Peace_Prize|Nobel Peace Prize]] or [[Diplomacy|international mediation]].
**[[Margaret MacMillan]], ''War: How Conflict Shaped Us'' (2020) {{page number needed|June 2023}}


===O===
===O===
Line 268: Line 176:
*When it comes to every important international issue, people of the world do not look to [[Beijing]] or [[Moscow]] to lead.
*When it comes to every important international issue, people of the world do not look to [[Beijing]] or [[Moscow]] to lead.
** [[Barack Obama]], [https://medium.com/@WhiteHouse/president-obama-s-2016-state-of-the-union-address-7c06300f9726#.flsvqkay9 State of the Union address] (12 January 2016).
** [[Barack Obama]], [https://medium.com/@WhiteHouse/president-obama-s-2016-state-of-the-union-address-7c06300f9726#.flsvqkay9 State of the Union address] (12 January 2016).

*For years, Chinese [[Intellectual|intellectuals]] distinguished between words and actions. Western political ideas could be discussed in China as long as nobody tried to enact them... Sealing China off from western ideas poses some practical problems... Chinese leaders since [[Deng Xiaoping]] have adhered to a principle known as 'Hide your strength, bide your time'... No diplomatic relationship matters more to China's future than its [[China–United States relations|dealings with the United States]]... For years, American military leaders worried that there was a growing risk of an accidental clash between China and the U.S., in part because Beijing protested U.S. policies by declining meetings between senior commanders... A decade ago, the Chinese Internet was alive with debate, confession, humor, and discovery. Month by month, it is becoming more sterilized and self-contained. To the degree that China's connection to the outside world matters, the digital links are deteriorating. Voice-over-Internet calls, [[w:Viral video|viral videos]], [[w:Podcast|podcasts]], the minor accessories of contemporary digital life, are less reachable abroad than they were a year ago. It's an astonishing thing to observe in a rising superpower. How many countries in 2015 have an [[Internet]] connection to the world that is worse than it was a year ago?
**[[w:Evan Osnos|Evan Osnos]], [http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/04/06/born-red "Born Red: How Xi Jinping, an unremarkable provincial administrator, became China’s most authoritarian leader since Mao."] (6 April 2015), ''The New Yorker''.


*China remains the world's largest [[Manufacturing|manufacturer]], with four trillion dollars in foreign-exchange reserves, a sum equivalent to the world’s fourth-largest economy... Last spring, China abolished registered-capital and other requirements for new companies, and in November it allowed foreign investors to trade shares directly on the [[w:Shanghai Stock Exchange|Shanghai stock market]] for the first time... The risks to [[Economy of China|China's economy]] have rarely been more visible. The workforce is aging more quickly than in other countries, because of the [[w:One-child policy|one-child policy]], and businesses are borrowing money more rapidly than they are earning it... The growth of demand for energy and raw materials has slowed, more houses and malls are empty, and nervous Chinese savers are sending money overseas, to protect it in the event of a crisis... To maintain economic growth, China is straining to promote innovation... After China had spent years investing in science and technology, the share of its economy devoted to research and development surpassed Europe's... The era of [[Xi Jinping]] has defied the assumption that China's fitful opening to the world is too critical and productive to stall.
*China remains the world's largest [[Manufacturing|manufacturer]], with four trillion dollars in foreign-exchange reserves, a sum equivalent to the world’s fourth-largest economy... Last spring, China abolished registered-capital and other requirements for new companies, and in November it allowed foreign investors to trade shares directly on the [[w:Shanghai Stock Exchange|Shanghai stock market]] for the first time... The risks to [[Economy of China|China's economy]] have rarely been more visible. The workforce is aging more quickly than in other countries, because of the [[w:One-child policy|one-child policy]], and businesses are borrowing money more rapidly than they are earning it... The growth of demand for energy and raw materials has slowed, more houses and malls are empty, and nervous Chinese savers are sending money overseas, to protect it in the event of a crisis... To maintain economic growth, China is straining to promote innovation... After China had spent years investing in science and technology, the share of its economy devoted to research and development surpassed Europe's... The era of [[Xi Jinping]] has defied the assumption that China's fitful opening to the world is too critical and productive to stall.
Line 280: Line 185:
** {{w|Emanuel Pastreich}}, [http://thediplomat.com/2015/12/interview-daniel-bell/ "Chinese meritocracy and the limits of democracy"] (17 December 2015), ''The Diplomat''
** {{w|Emanuel Pastreich}}, [http://thediplomat.com/2015/12/interview-daniel-bell/ "Chinese meritocracy and the limits of democracy"] (17 December 2015), ''The Diplomat''


*The Chinese are rejecting western values and multiparty democracy... It seems very incongruous to be, on the one hand, so committed to fostering more competition and market-driven flexibility in the economy and, on the other hand, to be seeking more control in the political sphere, the media, and the Internet.
*The Chinese are rejecting western values and multiparty democracy... It seems very incongruous to be, on the one hand, so committed to fostering more competition and market-driven flexibility in the economy and, on the other hand, to be seeking more control in the political sphere, the [[Mass media|media]], and the [[Internet]].
**[[Henry Paulson]], ''Dealing with China'', as quoted in [http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/04/06/born-red "Born Red: How Xi Jinping, an unremarkable provincial administrator, became China’s most authoritarian leader since Mao."] (6 April 2015), by Evan Osnos, ''The New Yorker''
**[[Henry Paulson]], ''Dealing with China'', as quoted in [http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/04/06/born-red "Born Red: How Xi Jinping, an unremarkable provincial administrator, became China’s most authoritarian leader since Mao."] (6 April 2015), by Evan Osnos, ''The New Yorker''

*The leadership from the top over the last three American presidencies has steadily pushed US public opinion from being friendly towards China in the direction of [[hostility]]. Intellectual property theft is a widely used reason for giving China a hard time. Yet in a recent survey made by the [[w:US-China Business Council|US-China Business Council]], [[intellectual property]] protection ranked sixth on a list of pressing concerns among American companies which trade with China. In 2014 China created its first specialized court to handle intellectual property cases. In 2015 plaintiffs brought before the court 63 cases. The court ruled for the foreign firms in all 63. China itself is clearly against the theft of business secrets.
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/03/05/its-rubbish-to-trash-china/ It’s Rubbish to Trash China], by [https://www.counterpunch.org/author/3remacr111/ Jonathan Power,] [[W: CounterPunch|''Counter Punch'']], (March 5, 2020)

*How many people outside China are aware of the responsible way China acts internationally? Take the [[United Nations|UN]] for example. According to the respected journalist [[Fareed Zakaria]], writing in this month’s ''[[w:Foreign Affairs|Foreign Affairs]]'', “Beijing is now the second-largest funder of the UN and [[w:United Nations peacekeeping|UN peacekeepers]]. It has deployed 2,500 peacekeepers, more than all the other permanent members of the [[W:United Nations Security Council|Security Council]] combined. Between 2000 and 2008 it supported 182 of 190 Security Council resolutions imposing sanctions on nations deemed to have violated international rules or norms”. This is a very different China than the one projected by many Western politicians and journalists. Usually, China is reported as being an impediment at the [[w:United Nations Security Council|Security Council]], using its veto fast and furiously. <BR> China has not gone to [[war]] since 1979. It has not used lethal military force abroad since 1988. Nor has it funded proxies or armed insurgents anywhere in the world since the early 1980s... this record of non-intervention China is unique among the world’s great powers. China has had no permanent military presence outside China until recently when it finished building its first overseas base... on the [[w:Horn of Africa|Horn of Africa]] to protect the shipping of its oil through the unstable political waters of the [[w:Persian Gulf|Persian Gulf]] and the [[w:Indian Ocean|Indian Ocean]]...<BR>China is angry when... US spy planes flying through Chinese airspace... China does not fly through US airspace. Its flights are on the other side of the world.
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/03/05/its-rubbish-to-trash-china/ It’s Rubbish to Trash China], by [https://www.counterpunch.org/author/3remacr111/ Jonathan Power,] [[W: CounterPunch|''Counter Punch'']], (March 5, 2020)

*The United States, [[W:Jorge Arreaza|Arreaza]] told me, “has gone to the extent of carrying out modern acts of [[piracy]], stopping ships in the middle of the ocean and stealing cargo that was paid for by the [[Venezuela|Venezuelan]] people.” Not only has the [[United States sanctions|United States tried to blockade Venezuela]], but it continues to interfere in Venezuela’s political affairs; this includes trying to undermine the legislative elections that will be held on December 6....China has largely disregarded the [[U.S. sanctions |U.S. sanctions against Venezuela]], which is the largest recipient of Chinese loans. “When China states that it will continue to trade with Venezuela,” Arreaza told me, “it is standing against the [[international law|illegality]] of the U.S. coercive measures that are placed on Venezuela.” Venezuela’s difficulty in servicing the debt to China is seen in Beijing as the fault of the illegal sanctions regime, which has made normal economic activity impossible; China’s “patient capital” strategy and its understanding of the geopolitical pressure on Venezuela are key to understanding its relationship.
**[[Vijay Prashad]] in [https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/11/27/why-imperialism-is-obsolete-in-latin-america/ Why Imperialism is Obsolete in Latin America, An interview with Jorge Arreaza, foreign minister of Venezuela, ''CounterPunch''], Nov 27, 2020

*In September 2018, Venezuelan president [[Nicolás Maduro]] visited [[China|China,]] where he met with China’s President [[Xi Jinping]] and signed a series of important agreements on trade and culture. Toward the end of his stay, Maduro said that the two countries had built “a relationship of mutual benefit, of shared gain.” Among these agreements was one that highlights the depth of the [[collaboration]]: this was for China to participate with the [[w:Great Venezuela Housing Mission|Great Venezuela Housing Mission]] (GMVV) to build more than 13,000 homes in the El Valle parish in [[w:Caracas|Caracas]]. The focus of the international media has been on the oil trade between China and Venezuela, and in the aid from China to Venezuela; but the connections go deeper, into the social life of the people who are struggling to emerge from deprivation...<BR>China, [[W:Jorge Arreaza|Arreaza]] (foreign minister of Venezuela) says, trades with countries without interference in their internal affairs. This is quite different from the Western model, notably that overseen by the [[International Monetary Fund|International Monetary Fund (IMF)]], which pushes for structural adjustment alongside loans. Because China respects the [[Sovereignty|sovereign]] choices of a country, Arreaza told me, “China has proven to be a reliable partner for the region and it can continue to play a key role in our development for many years to come.”
**[[Vijay Prashad]] in [https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/11/27/why-imperialism-is-obsolete-in-latin-america/ Why Imperialism is Obsolete in Latin America, An interview with Jorge Arreaza, foreign minister of Venezuela, ''CounterPunch''], Nov 27, 2020


===R===
===R===

*The big picture in the Middle East isn't [[Iran]] or [[Iraq]]. The big picture in the [[Middle East]] is China. People don't understand that. They don't know what’s going on right now. It's about leveraging control over Middle-Eastern and central-Asian oil, in order to dictate the pace of China's economic growth over the next 30 years. Because China's the biggest threat in the eyes of the [[neoconservatives]]. It's this massive [[Economy of China|Chinese economy]] that's been expanding by leaps and bounds that’s going to threaten American global economic hegemony. Now I'm not saying this is what I believe, I'm just saying it's what's in the minds of these neoconservatives. You deal with China indirectly at this point in time because you don't want direct confrontation.
**[http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/Content?oid=oid%3A42834 Scott Ritter Says Controversial Things About Clinton, Bush, Fox News, the Surge, etc., Interview with the ''Memphis Flyer'',] (8 May 2008)

*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with [[Russia]], which might also mean with China. The war would be [[Nuclear war|nuclear]] and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that [[Donald Trump|Trump]]’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security... The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long [[Cold War]].
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/ ''The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal''] (26 December 2018)

*[[United States|We]] cannot, if we would, play the part of [[w:Qing dynasty|China]], and be content to rot by inches in ignoble ease within our borders, taking no interest in what goes on beyond them, sunk in a scrambling commercialism; heedless of the higher life, the life of aspiration, of toil and risk, busying ourselves only with the wants of our bodies for the day, until suddenly we should find, beyond a shadow of question, what China has already found, that in this world the nation that has trained itself to a career of un-warlike and isolated ease is bound, in the end, to go down before other nations which have not lost the manly and adventurous qualities. If we are to be a really great people, we must strive in good faith to play a great part in the world.
*[[United States|We]] cannot, if we would, play the part of [[w:Qing dynasty|China]], and be content to rot by inches in ignoble ease within our borders, taking no interest in what goes on beyond them, sunk in a scrambling commercialism; heedless of the higher life, the life of aspiration, of toil and risk, busying ourselves only with the wants of our bodies for the day, until suddenly we should find, beyond a shadow of question, what China has already found, that in this world the nation that has trained itself to a career of un-warlike and isolated ease is bound, in the end, to go down before other nations which have not lost the manly and adventurous qualities. If we are to be a really great people, we must strive in good faith to play a great part in the world.
**[[Theodore Roosevelt]], ''[[s:The Strenuous Life|The Strenuous Life]]'' (10 April 1899), Chicago, Illinois
**[[Theodore Roosevelt]], ''[[s:The Strenuous Life|The Strenuous Life]]'' (10 April 1899), Chicago, Illinois
Line 311: Line 197:
*If you want to know what people are worried about look at what they spend their money on. If you’re afraid of [[Theft|burglars]] you buy a burglar alarm. What are the Chinese spending their money on? We’re told from Chinese figures they’re spending on the [[People's Armed Police|People’s Armed Police]], the internal security force is about as big as they’re spending on the [[w:People's Liberation Army|regular military]]. This whole great firewall of Chinese, this whole massive effort to control the [[internet]], this effort to use modern [[information technology]] not to disseminate [[information]], empowering individuals, but to make people think what you want them to think and to monitor their behavior so that you can isolate and suppress them. That’s because this is a regime which is fundamentally afraid of its own people. And it’s fundamentally hostile to them.
*If you want to know what people are worried about look at what they spend their money on. If you’re afraid of [[Theft|burglars]] you buy a burglar alarm. What are the Chinese spending their money on? We’re told from Chinese figures they’re spending on the [[People's Armed Police|People’s Armed Police]], the internal security force is about as big as they’re spending on the [[w:People's Liberation Army|regular military]]. This whole great firewall of Chinese, this whole massive effort to control the [[internet]], this effort to use modern [[information technology]] not to disseminate [[information]], empowering individuals, but to make people think what you want them to think and to monitor their behavior so that you can isolate and suppress them. That’s because this is a regime which is fundamentally afraid of its own people. And it’s fundamentally hostile to them.
**[[w:Stephen Peter Rosen|Stephen Rosen]], [https://conversationswithbillkristol.org/video/stephen-rosen-ii/ interview with Bill Kristol] (30 November 2018), [https://conversationswithbillkristol.org/transcript/stephen-rosen-ii-transcript/ transcript]
**[[w:Stephen Peter Rosen|Stephen Rosen]], [https://conversationswithbillkristol.org/video/stephen-rosen-ii/ interview with Bill Kristol] (30 November 2018), [https://conversationswithbillkristol.org/transcript/stephen-rosen-ii-transcript/ transcript]
[[File:Forbidden City Beijing Shenwumen Gate.JPG|thumb|The Chinese are a great nation, incapable of permanent suppression by foreigners. They will not consent to adopt our vices in order to acquire military strength; but they are willing to adopt our virtues in order to advance in wisdom. I think they are the only people in the world who quite genuinely believe that wisdom is more precious than rubies. ~ [[Bertrand Russell]]]]
* The typical Westerner wishes to be the cause of as many changes as possible in his environment; the typical Chinaman wishes to enjoy as much and as delicately as possible.
* The typical Westerner wishes to be the cause of as many changes as possible in his environment; the typical Chinaman wishes to enjoy as much and as delicately as possible.
** [[Bertrand Russell]], ''The Problem of China'' (1922), Ch. XII: The Chinese Character.
** [[Bertrand Russell]], ''The Problem of China'' (1922), Ch. XII: The Chinese Character.
[[File:2016-09-10 Beijing Panjiayuan market 49 anagoria.jpg|thumb| The Chinese are a great nation, incapable of permanent suppression by foreigners. They will not consent to adopt our vices in order to acquire military strength; but they are willing to adopt our virtues in order to advance in wisdom. I think they are the only people in the world who quite genuinely believe that wisdom is more precious than rubies. That is why the West regards them as uncivilized. ~ [[Bertrand Russell]] ]]
* The Chinese are a great nation, incapable of permanent suppression by foreigners. They will not consent to adopt our vices in order to acquire military strength; but they are willing to adopt our virtues in order to advance in wisdom. I think they are the only people in the world who quite genuinely believe that wisdom is more precious than rubies. That is why the West regards them as uncivilized.
* The Chinese are a great nation, incapable of permanent suppression by foreigners. They will not consent to adopt our vices in order to acquire military strength; but they are willing to adopt our virtues in order to advance in wisdom. I think they are the only people in the world who quite genuinely believe that wisdom is more precious than rubies. That is why the West regards them as uncivilized.
** [[Bertrand Russell]], ''The Problem of China'' (1922), Ch. XIII: Higher education in China.
** [[Bertrand Russell]], ''The Problem of China'' (1922), Ch. XIII: Higher education in China.


===S===
===S===

*'''The US is a force for division, not for [[cooperation]]'''... It's a force for trying to create a [[New Cold War|new cold war]] with [[China]]. If this takes hold - if that kind of approach is used, then we won't go back to normal, indeed we will spiral into greater controversy and greater [[danger]] in fact. The US lost its step on [[w:5G|5G]], which is a critical part of the new digital economy. And [[w:Huawei|Huawei]] was taking a greater and greater share of global markets... The US concocted in my opinion, the view that Huawei is a global threat. And has leaned very hard on US allies... to try to break the relations with Huawei.
*The [[United States|US]] is a force for division, not for [[cooperation]]... Do I believe that [[China]] could do more to ease fears that are very real? I do.... The big choice frankly is in China's hands. If China is [[cooperative]], if it engages in [[diplomacy]], regional cooperation and [[w:multilateralism|multilateralism]]…. then I think that [[Asia]] has an incredibly bright future.
**[[Jeffrey Sachs]] quoted in [https://www.bbc.com/news/business-53104730 ''US China cold war 'bigger global threat than virus''' By Karishma Vaswani, ''BBC News''] (21 June 2020)


*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of [[Xi Jinping]], particularly after his virtual summit with [[Joe Biden]], he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world... I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats & Republicans, ''Democracy Now!''] (24 November 2021)

* Some observers have already proclaimed that [[W:Chinese Century|China will rule the world]], This prospective is profoundly overstated and incorrect in my view... China has a long way to go before it becomes, if it ever becomes a true {{w|global power}}, and it will never rule the world.
* Some observers have already proclaimed that [[W:Chinese Century|China will rule the world]], This prospective is profoundly overstated and incorrect in my view... China has a long way to go before it becomes, if it ever becomes a true {{w|global power}}, and it will never rule the world.
** {{w|David Shambaugh}}, [https://web.archive.org/web/20160303182244/http://210.101.116.28/W_files/kiss61/1l201503_pv.pdf ''China Goes Global: The Partial Power''] (2013), New York: Oxford University Press
** {{w|David Shambaugh}}, [https://web.archive.org/web/20160303182244/http://210.101.116.28/W_files/kiss61/1l201503_pv.pdf ''China Goes Global: The Partial Power''] (2013), New York: Oxford University Press


* China is, in essence, a very narrow-minded, self-interested, realist state, seeking only to maximize its own national interests and power. It cares little for global governance and enforcing global standards of behavior, except its much-vaunted doctrine of noninterference in the internal affairs of countries. Its economic policies are mercantilist and its diplomacy is passive. China is also a lonely strategic power, with no allies and experiencing distrust and strained relationships with much of the world.
* China is, in essence, a very narrow-minded, self-interested, realist state, seeking only to maximize its own national interests and power. It cares little for global governance and enforcing global standards of [[behavior]], except its much-vaunted doctrine of noninterference in the internal affairs of countries. Its economic policies are [[Mercantilism|mercantilist]] and its diplomacy is passive. China is also a lonely strategic power, with no allies and experiencing distrust and strained relationships with much of the world.
** {{w|David Shambaugh}}, [https://web.archive.org/web/20160303182244/http://210.101.116.28/W_files/kiss61/1l201503_pv.pdf ''China Goes Global: The Partial Power''] (2013), New York: Oxford University Press, p. 310
** {{w|David Shambaugh}}, [https://web.archive.org/web/20160303182244/http://210.101.116.28/W_files/kiss61/1l201503_pv.pdf ''China Goes Global: The Partial Power''] (2013), New York: Oxford University Press, p. 310


*China is a very contradictory country... China punches way below its weight, it is not, it ''is'' free-riding... It is not contributing... China is a lonely power... Who wants to seek political asylum in China? Nobody.
*China is a very contradictory country... China punches way below its weight, it is not, it ''is'' free-riding... It is not contributing... China is a lonely power... Who wants to seek political asylum in China? Nobody.
** {{w|David Shambaugh}}, [http://listenonrepeat.com/watch/?v=7aE66iIUi9U#David_Shambaugh_-_China_Goes_Global%3A_The_Partial_Power "David Shambaugh - China Goes Global: The Partial Power"] (April 2013), ''USC U.S.-China Institute'', YouTube
** {{w|David Shambaugh}}, [http://listenonrepeat.com/watch/?v=7aE66iIUi9U#David_Shambaugh_-_China_Goes_Global%3A_The_Partial_Power "David Shambaugh - China Goes Global: The Partial Power"] (April 2013), ''USC U.S.-China Institute'', YouTube
*The subsequent evolution of the Chinese state is one where [[Bureaucracy|bureaucratic]] recruitment and rule became ever more routinized, and this occurred at the expense of hereditary lineages. In western Europe, after the [[w:fall of the Western Roman Empire|fall of Rome]] rulers pursued a policy of giving grants of land in exchange for military service. These grants tended to be one-way transactions. Over time this led to the creation of a category of members of society with substantial autonomy. The presence of this group would play a prominent role in the early development of medieval assemblies. In China things pushed in the opposite direction. With the perfection of an [[w:Chinese imperial examination|imperial examination system]] during the [[w:Tang dynasty|Tang]] and [[w:Song dynasty|Song dynasties]], Chinese rulers had at their disposal a means of bureaucratic recruitment that did not depend on societal networks outside of their control. Being a member of the elite now meant being part of the state itself.
*The subsequent evolution of the Chinese state is one where [[Bureaucracy|bureaucratic]] recruitment and rule became ever more routinized, and this occurred at the expense of hereditary lineages. In [[western Europe]], after the [[w:fall of the Western Roman Empire|fall of Rome]] rulers pursued a policy of giving grants of [[land]] in exchange for [[military]] service. These grants tended to be one-way transactions. Over time this led to the creation of a category of members of society with substantial autonomy. The presence of this group would play a prominent role in the early development of [[Middle Ages|medieval]] assemblies. In China things pushed in the opposite direction. With the perfection of an [[w:Chinese imperial examination|imperial examination system]] during the [[w:Tang dynasty|Tang]] and [[w:Song dynasty|Song dynasties]], Chinese rulers had at their disposal a means of bureaucratic recruitment that did not depend on societal networks outside of their control. Being a member of the elite now meant being part of the state itself.
**David Stasavage, ''The Decline and Rise of Democracy: A Global History from Antiquity to Today'' (2020), pp. 14-15
**David Stasavage, ''The Decline and Rise of Democracy: A Global History from Antiquity to Today'' (2020), pp. 14-15


Line 346: Line 221:
** [[Sun Yat-sen]], ''Capital and the State'' (1924)
** [[Sun Yat-sen]], ''Capital and the State'' (1924)


* This is a fight with a really different civilization and a different ideology, and the United States hasn’t had that before, it’s also striking that this is the first time that '''we will have a great power competitor that is not Caucasian'''.
* This is a fight with a really different civilization and a different ideology, and the United States hasn’t had that before, it’s also striking that this is the first time that '''we will have a great power competitor that is not [[White people|Caucasian]]'''.
**[[Kiron Skinner]], speaking about China, as quoted in "[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/05/02/worst-justification-trumps-battle-with-china-clash-civilizations/ The worst justification for Trump’s battle with China? The ‘clash of civilizations’]" (29 April 2019) ''[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/05/02/worst-justification-trumps-battle-with-china-clash-civilizations/?utm_term=.5509ea20a1f1 Washington Post]''
**[[Kiron Skinner]], speaking about China, as quoted in "[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/05/02/worst-justification-trumps-battle-with-china-clash-civilizations/ The worst justification for Trump’s battle with China? The ‘clash of civilizations’]" (29 April 2019) ''[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/05/02/worst-justification-trumps-battle-with-china-clash-civilizations Washington Post]''
[[File:WTO Public Forum 2019 Day 1 (48865279387).jpg|thumb|US military spending totaled $732 billion in 2019, nearly three times the $261 billion China spent. The US.. has around 800 overseas military bases, while China has just one... The US has many military bases close to China, which has none anywhere near the US. The US has 5,800 nuclear warheads; China has roughly 320. The US has 11 aircraft carriers; China has one. The US has launched many overseas wars in the past 40 years; China has launched none. ~ [[Jeffrey Sachs|Jeffrey Saches]]]]
===America’s Unholy Crusade Against China, [[Jeffrey Sachs]], (5 August 2020)===
<small>[https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/america-evangelical-crusade-against-china-by-jeffrey-d-sachs-2020-08 (full text)]</small>
*Last month, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered an anti-China speech that was extremist, simplistic, and dangerous. If biblical literalists like Pompeo remain in power past November, they could well bring the world to the brink of a war that they expect and perhaps even seek.<BR>According to Pompeo, Chinese leader Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) harbor a “decades-long desire for global hegemony.” This is ironic... Pompeo’s zealous excesses have deep roots in [[History of the United States|American history]]... Pompeo himself is a [[w:Biblical_literalism|biblical literalist]] who believes that the end time, the apocalyptic battle between [[good and evil]], is imminent. Pompeo described his beliefs...: ''America is a [[Judeo-Christian]] nation, the greatest in history, whose task is to fight God’s battles until the Rapture, when Christ’s born-again followers, like Pompeo, will be swept to heaven at the [[Last Judgment]]''... Pompeo’s inflammatory anti-China rhetoric could become even more apocalyptic in the coming weeks, if only to fire up the Republican base ahead of the election.

*According to [[Mike Pompeo|Pompeo [U.S. Secretary of State]]], Chinese leader Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) harbor a “decades-long desire for global [[hegemony]].” This is ironic. Only one country – the US – has a defense strategy calling for it to be the “preeminent military power in the world,” with “favorable regional balances of power in the Indo-Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and the Western Hemisphere.” China’s defense white paper, by contrast, states that “China will never follow the beaten track of big powers in seeking hegemony,” and that, “As economic [[globalization]], the information society, and cultural diversification develop in an increasingly multi-polar world, peace, development, and win-win cooperation remain the irreversible trends of the times.”
*US military spending totaled $732 billion in 2019, nearly three times the $261 billion China spent. The US.. has around 800 overseas military bases, while China has just one (a small naval base in [[w:Djibouti|Djibouti]]). The US has many military bases close to China, which has none anywhere near the US. The US has 5,800 nuclear warheads; China has roughly 320. The US has 11 aircraft carriers; China has one. The US has launched many overseas wars in the past 40 years; China has launched none (though it has been criticized for border skirmishes, most recently with India, that stop short of war).

*The world took relatively little notice of Pompeo’s speech, which offered no evidence to back up his claims of China’s hegemonic ambition. China’s rejection of US hegemony does not mean that China itself seeks hegemony. Indeed, outside of the US, there is little belief that China aims for global dominance. China’s explicitly stated national goals are to be a “moderately prosperous society” by 2021 (the centenary of the CPC), and a “fully [[developed country]]” by 2049 (the centennial of the People’s Republic).

*Moreover, at an estimated $10,098 in 2019, China’s [[Gross Domestic Product|GDP]] per capita was less than one-sixth that of the US ($65,112) – hardly the basis for global supremacy. China still has a lot of catching up to do to achieve even its basic economic development goals. Assuming that Trump loses in November’s presidential election, Pompeo’s speech will likely receive no further notice. The Democrats will surely criticize China, but without Pompeo’s brazen exaggerations. Yet, if Trump wins, Pompeo’s speech could be a harbinger of chaos. Pompeo’s [[Evangelicalism in the United States|evangelism]] is real, and white evangelicals are the political base of today’s Republican Party. Pompeo’s zealous excesses have deep roots in American history.

*If Trump is defeated, as seems likely, the risk of a US confrontation with China will recede. But if he remains in power, whether by a true electoral victory, vote fraud, or even a coup (anything is possible), Pompeo’s crusade would probably proceed, and could well bring the world to the brink of a war that he expects and perhaps even seeks.

===T===
===T===
*One of the greatest untold secrets of history is that the 'modern world' in which we live is a unique synthesis of Chinese and Western ingredients. Possibly more than half of the basic inventions and discoveries upon which the 'modern world' rests come from China. And yet few people know this. Why? The Chinese themselves are as ignorant of this fact as Westerners. From the seventeenth century onwards, the Chinese became increasingly dazzled by European technological expertise, having experienced a period of [[amnesia]] regarding their own achievements. When the Chinese were shown a mechanical clock by Jesuit missionaries, they were awestruck. '''They had forgotten that it was they who had invented mechanical clocks in the first place!'''
*One of the greatest untold secrets of history is that the 'modern world' in which we live is a unique synthesis of Chinese and Western ingredients. Possibly more than half of the basic inventions and discoveries upon which the 'modern world' rests come from China. And yet few people know this. Why? The Chinese themselves are as ignorant of this fact as Westerners. From the seventeenth century onwards, the Chinese became increasingly dazzled by European technological expertise, having experienced a period of [[amnesia]] regarding their own achievements. When the Chinese were shown a mechanical clock by Jesuit missionaries, they were awestruck. '''They had forgotten that it was they who had invented mechanical clocks in the first place!'''
Line 369: Line 230:
**{{w|Tian Han}}, ''{{w|March of the Volunteers}}'' (1934).
**{{w|Tian Han}}, ''{{w|March of the Volunteers}}'' (1934).


* [A]t a time when the [[w:Health crisis|crisis]] of the [[2019–20 coronavirus pandemic|Coronavirus pandemic]] is developing rapidly. [...] The {{w|Chinese government}} currently appears “successful” in its response, but in the first weeks that [[w:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in mainland China|the new coronavirus]] appeared, [[w:Criticism of response to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic#Chinese government|the government]] offered the denialism typical of restorationist [[State capitalism|capitalist bureaucracy]], ignoring the warnings that could have reduced the number of deaths (including that of {{w|Li Wenliang}}, a doctor who warned about the epidemic and was consequently accused by the authorities of “spreading rumors” before he died from [[COVID-19]]). '''China is the most extreme example of [[w:Authoritarian capitalism#China|authoritarianism]] around the world, with its tight [[w:Bureaucratic collectivism|bureaucratic]] control [[w:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in mainland China#Censorship and police responses|that prevents vital news]] from leaving {{w|Wuhan}} and other affected areas.'''
* [A]t a time when the [[w:Health crisis|crisis]] of the [[COVID-19 pandemic|Coronavirus pandemic]] is developing rapidly. [...] The {{w|Chinese government}} currently appears “successful” in its response, but in the first weeks that the new [[SARS-CoV-2|coronavirus]] appeared, the government offered the denialism typical of restorationist [[State capitalism|capitalist bureaucracy]], ignoring the warnings that could have reduced the number of deaths (including that of [[Li Wenliang]], a doctor who warned about the epidemic and was consequently accused by the authorities of “spreading rumors” before he died from [[COVID-19]]). '''China is the most extreme example of [[w:Authoritarian capitalism#China|authoritarianism]] around the world, with its tight [[w:Bureaucratic collectivism|bureaucratic]] control [[w:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in mainland China#Censorship and police responses|that prevents vital news]] from leaving {{w|Wuhan}} and other affected areas.'''
** [[Trotskyist Fraction – Fourth International]], ''[https://www.leftvoice.org/coronavirus-and-the-healthcare-crisis-our-lives-are-worth-more-than-their-profits Coronavirus and the Healthcare Crisis: Our Lives Are Worth More than Their Profits!]'' (March 14, 2020), ''Left Voice''.
** [[Trotskyist Fraction – Fourth International]], ''[https://www.leftvoice.org/coronavirus-and-the-healthcare-crisis-our-lives-are-worth-more-than-their-profits Coronavirus and the Healthcare Crisis: Our Lives Are Worth More than Their Profits!]'' (March 14, 2020), ''Left Voice''.


Line 375: Line 236:
**[[Donald Trump]], as quoted in [http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnmauldin/2015/08/24/playing-the-chinese-trump-card/ "Playing the Chinese Trump Card"] (24 August 2015), [http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnmauldin/2015/08/24/playing-the-chinese-trump-card/ ''Forbes''] (August 2015).
**[[Donald Trump]], as quoted in [http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnmauldin/2015/08/24/playing-the-chinese-trump-card/ "Playing the Chinese Trump Card"] (24 August 2015), [http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnmauldin/2015/08/24/playing-the-chinese-trump-card/ ''Forbes''] (August 2015).


* The concept of [[W:Global warming conspiracy theory|global warming was created]] by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.
* The concept of [[Climate change denial|global warming was created]] by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. [[manufacturing]] non-competitive.
**[[Donald Trump]], [https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/265895292191248385?lang=pt Twitter] (6 November 2012)
**[[Donald Trump]], [https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/265895292191248385?lang=pt Twitter] (6 November 2012)
*We have a 500 billion dollar deficit, trade deficit with China. We're going to turn it around and we have the cards, don't forget, we're like the piggy bank that's being robbed. We have the cards, we have a lot of power with China. When China doesn't want to fix the problem in [[North Korea]] we say "Sorry folks, you've got to fix the problem." '''Because we can't continue to allow China to [[rape]] [[United States|our country]], and that's what they're doing. It's the greatest theft in the history of the world.'''
*We have a 500 billion dollar deficit, [[w:Trade_deficit|trade deficit]] with China. We're going to turn it around and we have the cards, don't forget, we're like the piggy bank that's being robbed. We have the cards, we have a lot of power with China. When China doesn't want to fix the problem in [[North Korea]] we say "Sorry folks, you've got to fix the problem." '''Because we can't continue to allow China to [[rape]] [[United States|our country]], and that's what they're doing. It's the greatest theft in the history of the world.'''
**[[Donald Trump]], as quoted in "[https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-36185275/china-accused-of-trade-rape-by-donald-trump China accused of trade 'rape' by Donald Trump]" (2 May 2016) ''[https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-36185275/china-accused-of-trade-rape-by-donald-trump BBC]''
**[[Donald Trump]], as quoted in "[https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-36185275/china-accused-of-trade-rape-by-donald-trump China accused of trade 'rape' by Donald Trump]" (2 May 2016) ''[https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-36185275/china-accused-of-trade-rape-by-donald-trump BBC]''


Line 389: Line 250:
**[[Mark Twain]], as quoted in ''Mark Twain and the Three Rs: Race, Religion, Revolution and Related Matters'' (1973), by Maxwell Geismar, Indianapolis: Bobs-Merrill, p. 98.
**[[Mark Twain]], as quoted in ''Mark Twain and the Three Rs: Race, Religion, Revolution and Related Matters'' (1973), by Maxwell Geismar, Indianapolis: Bobs-Merrill, p. 98.


[[File:Night view from the Bund.jpg|thumb|When our thousands of Chinese students abroad return home, you will see how China will transform itself. ~ [[Deng Xiaoping]]]]
[[File:Nanking bodies 1937.jpg|thumb|People who try to commit [[suicide]] — don't attempt to save them! . . . China is such a populous nation, it is not as if we cannot do without a few people. (~1960) ~ [[Mao Zedong]]]]

[[File:National Revolutionary Army troops.png|thumb|It's better to have reform than revolution, but in Chinese history this cycle repeats itself. ~ [[w:Zhang Lifan|Lifan Zhang]]]]
===V===
===V===
* The Chinese have a foreign policy of building roads and bridges and feeding poor people.

** [[J.D. Vance]], [https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-169/issue-65/senate-section/article/S1238-1 FIRE GRANTS AND SAFETY ACT--Continued] (April 19, 2023)
*They [the Chinese] are immensely self-serving, as they would. But a the same time they have a quality that we need in [[w:Southern Europe|Southern Europe]]. Actually, I think everyone needs to have foreign direct investment by patient [[Investment|investors]]. They are patient investors. They don't come in to grab an asset for speculative purposes. They come in order to create a base on which to build and build and build. And their horizon is 20-30 years. What Europe has not done with Greece is to do what the Chinese were prepared to do to come there with their workers, with their engineers, and actully do some serious work.
**[[Yanis Varoufakis]] in [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afhQtQCi0XI?t=125 ''Yanis Varoufakis on China''] (20 September 2017)

*They [the Chinese] are far more humanistic than the [[United States]] ever was. [...] Of course they're trying... they are peddling for influence, but they are non-interventionists. Absolutely non-interventionists in a way that Europeans, the West, has never managed to fathom. The Chinese never asked [[Apple Inc.|Apple]] to go to [[w:Shenzhen|Shenzhen]] and produce all the [[IPhone|iPhones]], it was [[Steve Jobs]] that decided that. It was not China that went to [[Washington, D.C.|Washington DC]] and demanded that they buy a third of your [[w:United States national debt|national debt]]. If they hadn't bought it, you would be in serious trouble. [...] When it comes to the influence of China outside its borders, it's quite remarkable that they don't seem to have any military ambitions. Instead of going into Africa with troops, colonially destroying the country, killing people like the West has done for the last hundred years, what they did was they went to [[w:Addis_Ababa|Addis Ababa]] and they said to the government: "We can see you have problems with your infrastructure, we would like to build some new airports and upgrade your [[Rail transport|railway system]], create a [[w:Telephone|telephone]] system, and rebuild your [[Road|roads]]. And we will do this all for free." No strings attached. "We don't want anything from you". And they did. Why did they do it? Because this is soft power.
**[[Yanis Varoufakis]] in [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBgbYQ5QAM0?t=103 ''Don't Worry So Much About China''] (May 2018)

*The deepening cold war between the US and China will be a bigger worry for the world than coronavirus, according to influential economist [[Jeffrey Sachs]]. The world is headed for a period of "massive disruption without any leadership" in the aftermath of the pandemic, he told the [[w:BBC|BBC]]. The divide between the two superpowers will exacerbate this, he warned. The [[w:Columbia University|Columbia University]] professor blamed the US administration for the hostilities between the two countries.
**[https://www.bbc.com/news/business-53104730 Karishma Vaswani in: ''US China cold war 'bigger global threat than virus, BBC News''] (21 June 2020)


===W===
===W===
* The United States and other [[Democracy|democratic]] nations do so much business with China that there is a tendency to turn a blind eye towards the Communist Party's abysmal human rights record. The Chinese Communist Party's strategy of liberalizing its national economy while harshly rejecting democracy has become the model for modern [[Dictatorship|dictatorships]]. [[Hu Jintao]] and his party control all media in China, between 250,000 and 300,000 Chinese citizens, including [[Dissent|political dissidents]], are incarcerated in "[[w:Re-education through labor|reeducation-through-labor]]" camps and the conviction rate in normal criminal trials in 99.7 percent. Less than 5 percent of trials include witnesses. [[Amnesty International]] has reported that children have been bussed to public executions as field trips.
* The United States and other [[Democracy|democratic]] nations do so much business with China that there is a tendency to turn a blind eye towards the Communist Party's abysmal human rights record. The Chinese Communist Party's strategy of liberalizing its national economy while harshly rejecting democracy has become the model for modern [[Dictatorship|dictatorships]]. [[Hu Jintao]] and his party control all media in China, between 250,000 and 300,000 Chinese citizens, including [[Dissent|political dissidents]], are incarcerated in "[[w:Re-education through labor|reeducation-through-labor]]" camps and the conviction rate in normal criminal trials in 99.7 percent. Less than 5 percent of trials include witnesses. [[Amnesty International]] has reported that children have been bussed to public [[Capital punishment|executions]] as field trips.
** David Wallechinsky, ''Tyrants: The World's 20 Worst Living Dictators'' (2006), p. 2
** David Wallechinsky, ''Tyrants: The World's 20 Worst Living Dictators'' (2006), p. 2
*The world must understand that millions of [[Uyghurs|Uighurs]] and other [[Muslim]] minorities in [[w:Xinjiang|Xinjiang]] are being sent to [[concentration camp]]s and forced into [[labor]].
*The world must understand that millions of [[Uyghurs|Uighurs]] and other [[Muslim]] minorities in [[w:Xinjiang|Xinjiang]] are being sent to [[concentration camp]]s and forced into [[labor]].
** [[w:Michael Waltz|Michael Waltz]] [https://waltz.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=459 Statement Regarding U.S. Declaration of China's Actions Against Uyghurs As Genocide] January 19, 2021
** [[w:Michael Waltz|Michael Waltz]] [https://waltz.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=459 Statement Regarding U.S. Declaration of China's Actions Against Uyghurs As Genocide] January 19, 2021


* There is a strange symmetry to China’s [[20th century|twentieth century]], and much of it is linked to the ideological Cold War. At the beginning of the century, China’s republican revolution was overtaken by Communism and conflict. And at the end of the century, Communism was overtaken by money and markets. In between lay a terrible time of [[destruction]] and reconstruction, of [[enthusiasm]] and [[cynicism]], and of almost never-ending rivers of blood. What marks these Chinese revolutions most of all is their bloodthirst: according to a recent estimate, seventy-seven million Chinese died unnatural deaths as a result of warfare or political mass-murder between the 1920s and the 1980s, and the vast majority of them were killed by other Chinese.
* There is a strange symmetry to China’s [[20th century|twentieth century]], and much of it is linked to the ideological Cold War. At the beginning of the century, China’s republican revolution was overtaken by [[Communism]] and conflict. And at the end of the century, Communism was overtaken by money and markets. In between lay a terrible time of [[destruction]] and reconstruction, of [[enthusiasm]] and [[cynicism]], and of almost never-ending rivers of blood. What marks these Chinese revolutions most of all is their bloodthirst: according to a recent estimate, seventy-seven million Chinese died unnatural deaths as a result of warfare or political mass-murder between the 1920s and the [[1980s]], and the vast majority of them were killed by other Chinese.
** Odd Arne Westad, ''The Cold War: A Global History'' (2017)
** Odd Arne Westad, ''The Cold War: A Global History'' (2017)
* [[Chinese language|Chinese]] is the easiest language when it is learned at ease, dwelling on its spirit rather than on the individual expression. But for inquisitive questioners, this language provides vain pitfalls.
* [[Chinese language|Chinese]] is the easiest language when it is learned at ease, dwelling on its spirit rather than on the individual expression. But for inquisitive questioners, this language provides vain pitfalls.
Line 418: Line 268:
**[[The World Bank]] Press Release No. 2022/072/EAP, [https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/04/01/lifting-800-million-people-out-of-poverty-new-report-looks-at-lessons-from-china-s-experience Lifting 800 Million People Out of Poverty – New Report Looks at Lessons from China’s Experience, April 1, 2022]
**[[The World Bank]] Press Release No. 2022/072/EAP, [https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/04/01/lifting-800-million-people-out-of-poverty-new-report-looks-at-lessons-from-china-s-experience Lifting 800 Million People Out of Poverty – New Report Looks at Lessons from China’s Experience, April 1, 2022]


*One of the things we're trying to do is view the China threat '''as not just a whole-of-government threat, but a whole-of-society threat''' on their end, and I think it's going to take a whole-of-society response by us.
* One of the things we're trying to do is view the China threat '''as not just a whole-of-government threat, but a whole-of-society threat''' on their end, and I think it's going to take a whole-of-society response by us.
**[[Christopher A. Wray]] in [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1802/13/cnr.04.html February 13, 2018] ''[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1802/13/cnr.04.html CNN]''
** [[Christopher A. Wray]] in [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1802/13/cnr.04.html February 13, 2018] ''[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1802/13/cnr.04.html CNN]''

* If anything changes China, it’ll be a mass movement caused by something other than [[politics]], or at least it won’t be political at the beginning.
** Wu Renhua, as quoted in [https://www.rfa.org/english/china/2024/11/14/china-student-night-cycle-rides-analysis/ "Night bike rides ‘chance to make memories’ for young, poor Chinese"], ''Radio Free Asia'' (November 14, 2024)


===X===
===X===
Line 442: Line 295:
** {{w|Lifan Zhang}}, as quoted in [http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/04/06/born-red "Born Red: How Xi Jinping, an unremarkable provincial administrator, became China’s most authoritarian leader since Mao."] (6 April 2015), by Evan Osnos, ''The New Yorker''
** {{w|Lifan Zhang}}, as quoted in [http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/04/06/born-red "Born Red: How Xi Jinping, an unremarkable provincial administrator, became China’s most authoritarian leader since Mao."] (6 April 2015), by Evan Osnos, ''The New Yorker''


==See also==
* [[China–United States relations|China-United States relations]]
*[[United Nations]]
*[[United Nations]]

== See also ==
* [[Religion in China]]


== External links ==
== External links ==
Line 451: Line 305:


[[Category:China| ]]
[[Category:China| ]]
[[Category:Countries in Asia]]

Latest revision as of 22:02, 15 November 2024

Flag of China

China (Chinese: 中国; pinyin: Zhōngguó), officially the People's Republic of China (PRC), is a country in East Asia. It is the world's second-most populous country with a population exceeding 1.4 billion. China spans the equivalent of five time zones and borders fourteen countries by land, tied with Russia as having the most of any country in the world. With an area of nearly 9.6 million square kilometres (3,700,000 sq mi), it is the world's third largest country by total land area. The country consists of 22 provinces, five autonomous regions, four municipalities, and two special administrative regions (Hong Kong and Macau). The national capital is Beijing, and the most populous city and largest financial center is Shanghai.


Arranged alphabetically by author or source:
A · B · C · D · E · F · G · H · I · J · K · L · M · N · O · P · Q · R · S · T · U · V · W · X · Y · Z · See also · External links

Quotes

[edit]

A

[edit]
  • China, despite many imperfections in its economic and political system, has been the most rapidly growing nation of the past three decades. Chinese poverty until Mao Zedong’s death had nothing to do with Chinese culture; it was due to the disastrous way Mao organized the economy and conducted politics. In the 1950s, he promoted the Great Leap Forward, a drastic industrialization policy that led to mass starvation and famine. In the 1960s, he propagated the Cultural Revolution, which led to the mass persecution of intellectuals and educated people—anyone whose party loyalty might be doubted. This again led to terror and a huge waste of the society’s talent and resources. In the same way, current Chinese growth has nothing to do with Chinese values or changes in Chinese culture; it results from a process of economic transformation unleashed by the reforms implemented by Deng Xiaoping and his allies, who, after Mao Zedong’s death, gradually abandoned socialist economic policies and institutions, first in agriculture and then in industry.
    • Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson, Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty (2012)
  • A neighbor with one billion people equipped with nuclear bombs and has expanded its military outlays by double digits for 17 years in a row, and it is unclear as to what this is being used for. It is beginning to be a considerable threat.

B

[edit]
  • China’s everything. Nothing else matters. We don’t get China right, we don’t get anything right. This whole thing is very simple. China is where Nazi Germany was in 1929 to 1930. The Chinese, like the Germans, are the most rational people in the world, until they’re not. And they’re gonna flip like Germany in the '30s. You’re going to have a hypernationalist state, and once that happens, you can’t put the genie back in the bottle.
China as a society, a government, an economy and a culture is quite difficult for us to comprehend today. The changes are so rapid in cities like Beijing and Shanghai and the culture remarkably fluid... China is increasingly influential in the world and more and more people have hopes that China will be a leader... China has ended up playing a critical role in geopolitics more quickly than anybody had anticipated.~Emanuel Pastreich
  • The most striking cultural shifts in China over the last two decades or so has been the revival, both orchestrated and spontaneous, of tradition. The main trope for culture in the twentieth century, especially since 1949, has been anti-traditionalism. As far back as the May 4th movement in 1919, and before, whether it was the financial elite, the liberals, the Marxists, or anarchists they all agreed that China was poor and that one of the causes of that state of affairs was the backward traditional culture... We have witnessed a dramatic reevaluation of tradition in China, and also in other East Asian countries with a Confucian heritage such as Korea. This part of the world has witnessed rapid growth over the last three decades that has sharply reduced poverty and the region has remained at peace. So when people look around and ask what do all these countries have in common, one answer is their Confucian heritage. So whereas the previous narrative was that Confucianism undermined modernization and economic growth, now many argue that it actually helps... Chinese thinkers gave much thought to how to select able and virtuous political leaders, which abilities matter and which virtues matter? Chinese pondered about, and experimented with, mechanisms for selecting leaders. And that tradition continues on today.
  • If I were an Englishman, I should esteem the man who advised a war with China to be the greatest living enemy of my country. You would be beaten in the end, and perhaps a revolution in India would follow.
    • Napoleon Bonaparte, reported as being from an 1817 conversation in The Mind of Napoleon, ed. and trans. J. Christopher Herold (1955), p. 249. Reported as unverified in Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations (1989)
  • The United States welcomes the emergence of a China that is peaceful and prosperous and that supports international institutions.

C

[edit]
  • There is a tendency in parts of Chinese thinking which says: "We need not only to be an important power in the region, we need to dominate the region!".
  • There is a hush over all Europe, nay, over all the world, broken only by the dull thud of Japanese bombs falling on Chinese cities, on Chinese Universities or near British and American ships. But then, China is a long way off, so why worry? The Chinese are fighting for what the founders of the American Constitution in their stately language called: “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” And they seem to be fighting very well. Many good judges think they are going to win. Anyhow, let’s wish them luck! Let’s give them a wave of encouragement – as your President did last week, when he gave notice about ending the commercial treaty. After all, the suffering Chinese are fighting our battle, the battle of democracy. They are defending the soil, the good earth, that has been theirs since the dawn of time against cruel and unprovoked aggression. Give them a cheer across the ocean – no one knows whose turn it may be next. If this habit of military dictatorships’ breaking into other people’s lands with bomb and shell and bullet, stealing the property and killing the proprietors, spreads too widely, we may none of us be able to think of summer holidays for quite a while.
  • The Chinese said of themselves several thousand years ago: "China is a sea that salts all the waters that flow into it." There's another Chinese saying about their country which is much more modern—it dates only from the fourth century. This is the saying: "The tail of China is large and will not be wagged." I like that one. The British democracy approves the principles of movable party heads and unwaggable national tails. It is due to the working of these important forces that I have the honor to be addressing you at this moment.
    • Winston Churchill, address to a joint session of Congress, Washington, D.C. (17 January 1952); reported in Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963, ed. Robert Rhodes James (1974), vol. 8, p. 8,326
  • The People's Republic of China is still a Marxist, Leninist, Maoist nation. So, you know, communism is still involved there. They haven't figured their way out of that particularly ideological box yet and that's their misfortune.

D

[edit]
  • The emperor hold upon the Chinamen may be strong, but the Chinaman's hold upon himself is stronger... The Chinaman will not long be willing to wear the cast off shoes of the negro, and, if he refuses, there will be trouble again. The negro worked and took his pay in religion and the lash. The Chinaman is a different article and will want the cash. He may, like the negro, accept Christianity, but, unlike the negro, he will not care to pay for it in labor. He had the Golden Rule in substance five hundred years before the coming of Christ, and has notions of justice that are not to be confused by any... Chinese children are in American schools in San Francisco. None of our children are in Chinese schools, and probably never will be, though in some things they might well teach us valuable lessons. Contact with these yellow children of the Celestial Empire would convince us that the points of human difference, great as they, upon first sight, seem, are as nothing compared with the points of human agreement. Such contact would remove mountains of prejudice... The Chinese in themselves have first rate recommendations. They are industrious, docile, cleanly, frugal. They are dexterous of hand, patient in toil, marvelously gifted in the power of imitation, and have but few wants.
  • It is objected to the Chinaman that he is secretive and treacherous, and will not tell the truth when he thinks it for his interest to tell a lie. There may be truth in all this; it sounds very much like the account of man’s heart given in the creeds. If he will not tell the truth, except when it is for his interest to do so, let us make it for his interest to tell the truth. We can do it by applying to him the same principle of justice that we apply to ourselves. But I doubt if the Chinese are more untruthful than other people. At this point I have one certain test. Mankind are not held together by lies. Trust is the foundation of society. Where there is no truth, there can be no trust, and where there is no trust, there can be no society. Where there is society, there is trust, and where there is trust, there is something upon which it is supported. Now a people who have confided in each other for five thousand years; who have extended their empire in all directions until it embraces one-fifth of the population of the globe; who hold important commercial relations with all nations; who are now entering into treaty stipulations with ourselves, and with all the great European powers, cannot be a nation of cheats and liars, but must have some respect for veracity. The very existence of China for so long a period, and her progress in civilization, are proofs of her truthfulness
  • No victory of arms, or tyranny of alien finance, can long suppress a nation so rich in resources and vitality. The invader will lose funds or patience before the loins of China will lose virility; within a century China will have absorbed and civilized her conquerors, and will have learned all the technique of what transiently bears the name of modern industry; roads and communications will give her unity, economy and thrift will give her funds, and a strong government will give her order and peace.

E

[edit]
  • Most people with mental disorders in China never receive treatment. There is often a stigma attached to such ailments. Some think that people with psychiatric conditions are possessed by evil spirits. Many see mental disorders as a sign of weakness, and regard them as socially contagious: a relative of someone with a serious disorder may find it hard to marry. Families sometimes have their kin treated far away to hide the “shame” of their condition, or keep them hidden at home. Even many medical students worry that those working with psychiatric patients risk catching their disease, says Xu Ni of “It Gets Brighter”, a mental-health NGO in Beijing.

F

[edit]

G

[edit]
  • But democracies also took root because they generally outperformed autocracies in raising living standards. Markets do not always require democracy in order to function: South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and China all developed successful economies under less than democratic conditions. The Cold War experience showed, though, that it is not easy to keep markets open and ideas constrained at the same time. And since markets proved more efficient than command economies in allocating resources and enhancing productivity, the resulting improvement in people s lives, in turn, strengthened democracies.
  • China’s capacity to meet new demands for agricultural products has been assessed by analysts inside and outside China since the 1980s. Economists have anticipated that market forces would induce China to import grains and other land-intensive crops, but Chinese officials (motivated by food security and other concerns) have long resisted these forces and sought to maintain self-sufficiency. However, officials are now adjusting their strategies to accommodate their country’s growing reliance on agricultural imports.
Bart Simpson: What happened to you, China? You used to be cool.
Chinese delegate: Hey, China's still cool!
  • The Chinese are emphatically not a religious people, though they are very superstitious. Belief in a God has come down from the remotest ages, but the old simple creed has been so overlaid by Buddhism as not to be discernible at the present day. Buddhism is now the dominant religion of China. It is closely bound up with the lives of the people, and is a never-failing refuge in sickness or worldly trouble. It is no longer the subtle doctrine which was originally presented to the people of India, but something much more clearly defined and appreciable by the plainest intellect. Buddha is the saviour of the people through righteousness alone, and Buddhist saints are popularly supposed to possess intercessory powers. Yet reverence is always wanting; and crowds will laugh and talk, and buy and sell sweetmeats, in a Buddhist temple, before the very eyes of the most sacred images. So long as divine intervention is not required, an ordinary Chinaman is content to neglect his divinities; but no sooner does sickness or financial trouble come upon the family, than he will hurry off to propitiate the gods.
    He accomplishes this through the aid of the priests, who receive his offerings of money, and light candles or incense at the shrine of the deity to be invoked. Buddhist priests are not popular with the Chinese, who make fun of their shaven heads, and doubt the sincerity of their convictions as well as the purity of their lives. "No meat nor wine may enter here" is a legend inscribed at the gate of most Buddhist temples, the ordinary diet as served in the refectory being strictly vegetarian. A tipsy priest, however, is not an altogether unheard-of combination, and has provided more than one eminent artist with a subject of an interesting picture.
  • Let us now pause to take stock of some of the results which have accrued from the operation and influence of Confucianism during such a long period, and over such swarming myriads of the human race. It is a commonplace in the present day to assert that the Chinese are hardworking, thrifty, and sober—the last-mentioned, by the way, in a land where drunkenness is not regarded as a crime. Shallow observers of the globe-trotter type, who have had their pockets picked by professional thieves in Hong-Kong, and even resident observers who have not much cultivated their powers of observation and comparison, will assert that honesty is a virtue denied to the Chinese; but those who have lived long in China and have more seriously devoted themselves to discover the truth, may one and all be said to be arrayed upon the other side. The amount of solid honesty to be met with in every class, except the professionally criminal class, is simply astonishing. That the word of the Chinese merchant is as good as his bond has long since become a household word, and so it is in other walks of life.
    • Herbert Allen Giles, in The Civilization of China (1911), Chapter III : Religion and Superstition

H

[edit]
  • So far, the world economy, particularly Australia and the United States, have benefited greatly from Chinese economic growth. This is likely to continue to be the case for some time... There is no real alternative to the United States as the global leader. China doesn't want the role. It would only divert its focus from its own development challenges. And to be frank, China would not be trusted by many countries, particularly in the Asia-Pacific, to be the global leader... Authoritarian state capitalism, seen today in China and Russia. While both countries have introduced elements of a market economy, private companies there operate side-by-side and at a significant disadvantage to state owned entities favored by government regulators. This mixed economy is not paralleled on the political side. What is emerging is an increasingly authoritarian political system with decreasing space for civil society, free media, and dissent. This model is attractive to authoritarian leaders around the world who see it as way to maintain power while still growing their economies.
  • As a foreign literature it is studied also by the Coreans, the Japanese, and the Annamites; and it may therefore be quite appropriately called the Classic Literature of the Far East. The civilization of all these nations has been affected by its study, perhaps even in a higher degree than that of the nations of Europe has been by the literatures of Greece and Rome. Millions received from it, in the course of centuries, their mental training. The Chinese who created it have through it perpetuated their national character and imparted some of their idiosyncrasies of thought to their formerly illiterate neighbors.
  • I did feel that I was going back to a place that I had never been.
    • Maxine Hong Kingston on visiting China the first time, in Conversations with Maxine Hong Kingston edited by Paul Skenazy and Tera Martin (1998)
  • When China sends its students to the United States, especially when it sends central bankers and planners to the United States to study (and be recruited), they are told by the U.S. “Do as we say, not as we have done.” The United States is not telling China... how to get rich in the way that it did, by protective tariffs, by creating its own money and by making other countries dependent on it. The United States does not want you to be independent and self-reliant. The United States wants China to let itself become dependent on U.S. finance in order to invest in its own industry... The neoliberal plan is not to make you independent, and not to help you grow except to the extent that your growth will be paid to US investors or used to finance U.S. military spending around the world to encircle you and trying to destabilize you in Sichuan to try to pry China apart. Look at what the United States has done in Russia, and at what the International Monetary Fund in Europe has done to Greece, Latvia and the Baltic states. It is a dress rehearsal for what U.S. diplomacy would like to do to you, if it can convince you to follow the neoliberal US economic policy of financialization and privatization. De-dollarization is the alternative to privatization and financialization.
  • China, like Russia, has been reducing its dollar holdings as much as possible, just keeping enough to prevent the currency from being destabilized by the dollar inflows. China, Russia are buying gold instead of U.S. dollars as much as possible. China is trying to escape from buying Treasury securities. Why would any government want to buy Treasury securities yielding 0.1% when the dollars coming into China are trying to make loans or buying countries, making 15% profit or interest a year? Nobody would want that situation to continue. China doesn’t want it to continue. As long as it [China] is part of an international economy that is dollarized, it [China] is forced to take a loss, a sacrifice, year after year, subsidizing the U.S. economy. The only way that it can avoid that is to isolate itself from the U.S. dollar. No country until this time since 1945 has ever had the critical mass to be able to do it. That is the objective, the stated objective of Russia, China and their allies. Of course, they don’t want to buy treasury bills. That doesn’t mean that, yes, they found a wonderful investment making 0.1% a year and subsidizing the United States. That is not what China or any other country wants.

I

[edit]

J

[edit]

K

[edit]
  • The collapse of U.S. influence over Saudi Arabia and the Kingdom’s new alliances with China and Iran are painful emblems of the abject failure of the Neocon strategy of maintaining U.S. global hegemony with aggressive projections of military power. China has displaced the American Empire by deftly projecting, instead, economic power. Over the past decade, our country has spent trillions bombing roads, ports, bridges, and airports. China spent the equivalent building the same across the developing world.
  • Contemporaneous with the age of Greek culture, while Rome was yet an infant city and the rest of Europe in a condition of barbarism, the Chinese were a civilised race. Many years before the Christian era they had evolved under the name of Taoism, a set of principles and a mystic teaching based on the writings of Laotzu, which formed a not altogether despicable substitute for a religion, while in Confucianism they enjoyed a sound philosophy. Under these influences the arts of peace gradually achieved the first place among the national ideas. The application of principles of reason to the relationships of daily life, the adjustment of differences by discussion, and the cultivation of respect for age and learning, became cardinal principles.
  • China too faces a world order that is new to it. For 2,000 years, the Chinese Empire had united its world under a single imperial rule. To be sure, that rule had faltered at times. Wars occurred in China no less frequently than they did in Europe. But since they generally took place among contenders for the imperial authority, they were more in the nature of civil rather than international wars, and, sooner or later, invariably led to the emergence of some new central power. Before the nineteenth century, China never had a neighbor capable of contesting its pre-eminence and never imagined that such a state could arise. Conquerors from abroad overthrew Chinese dynasties, only to be absorbed into Chinese culture to such an extent that they continued the traditions of the Middle Kingdom. The notion of the sovereign equality of states did not exist in China; outsiders were considered barbarians and were relegated to a tributary relationship—that was how the first British envoy to Beijing was received in the eighteenth century. China disdained sending ambassadors abroad but was not above using distant barbarians to overcome the ones nearby. Yet this was a strategy for emergencies, not a day-to-day operational system like the European balance of power, and it failed to produce the sort of permanent diplomatic establishment characteristic of Europe. After China became a humiliated subject of European colonialism in the nineteenth century, it re-emerged only recently—since the Second World War—into a multipolar world unprecedented in its history.

M

[edit]
  • To understand the changes which now appear upon the Chinese mainland, one must understand the changes in Chinese character and culture over the past 50 years. China, up to 50 years ago, was completely non-homogenous, being compartmented into groups divided against each other. The war-making tendency was almost non-existent, as they still followed the tenets of the Confucian ideal of pacifist culture. At the turn of the century, under the regime of Chang Tso Lin, efforts toward greater homogeneity produced the start of a nationalist urge. This was further and more successfully developed under the leadership of Chiang Kai-Shek, but has been brought to its greatest fruition under the present regime to the point that it has now taken on the character of a united nationalism of increasingly dominant, aggressive tendencies. Through these past 50 years the Chinese people have thus become militarized in their concepts and in their ideals. They now constitute excellent soldiers, with competent staffs and commanders. This has produced a new and dominant power in Asia, which, for its own purposes, is allied with Soviet Russia but which in its own concepts and methods has become aggressively imperialistic, with a lust for expansion and increased power normal to this type of imperialism. There is little of the ideological concept either one way or another in the Chinese make-up. The standard of living is so low and the capital accumulation has been so thoroughly dissipated by war that the masses are desperate and eager to follow any leadership which seems to promise the alleviation of local stringencies. I have from the beginning believed that the Chinese Communists' support of the North Koreans was the dominant one. Their interests are, at present, parallel with those of the Soviet. But I believe that the aggressiveness recently displayed not only in Korea but also in Indo-China and Tibet and pointing potentially toward the South reflects predominantly the same lust for the expansion of power which has animated every would-be conqueror since the beginning of time.
  • By contrast, classical China produced many great generals, fought many wars and conquered many peoples but did not elevate military values above civilian. (It helped, perhaps, that the scholars rather than the military wrote the histories.) Fighting was not held up as something admirable but rather as the result of a breakdown in order and propriety. There is no equivalent of the Iliad in Chinese literature and the heroes held up for the young to emulate were the great bureaucrats and wise rulers who maintained the peace. Early on Chinese thinkers such as Confucius and the great strategist Sunzi (also known in the transliteration Sun Tzu) stressed that the state’s authority rested on its virtue as well as on its ability to use force. And for Sunzi, the greatest general was the one who could win a war, through manoeuvre or trickery, without fighting a battle. Prestige in Chinese society came rather from being a scholar, poet or painter; and from the Tang dynasty onwards the examination system to enter the imperial civil service was the favoured path for fame and prestige. Successful generals were sometimes awarded a scholar’s rank and gown as a mark of particular favour where many European societies would have given military decorations to meritorious civilians. Societies’ values can change over time, of course. Swedish soldiers were once the terror of Europe when now we associate Sweden with the Nobel Peace Prize or international mediation.

O

[edit]
  • China remains the world's largest manufacturer, with four trillion dollars in foreign-exchange reserves, a sum equivalent to the world’s fourth-largest economy... Last spring, China abolished registered-capital and other requirements for new companies, and in November it allowed foreign investors to trade shares directly on the Shanghai stock market for the first time... The risks to China's economy have rarely been more visible. The workforce is aging more quickly than in other countries, because of the one-child policy, and businesses are borrowing money more rapidly than they are earning it... The growth of demand for energy and raw materials has slowed, more houses and malls are empty, and nervous Chinese savers are sending money overseas, to protect it in the event of a crisis... To maintain economic growth, China is straining to promote innovation... After China had spent years investing in science and technology, the share of its economy devoted to research and development surpassed Europe's... The era of Xi Jinping has defied the assumption that China's fitful opening to the world is too critical and productive to stall.

P

[edit]
  • China as a society, a government, an economy and a culture is quite difficult for us to comprehend today. The changes are so rapid in cities like Beijing and Shanghai and the culture remarkably fluid... China is increasingly influential in the world and more and more people have hopes that China will be a leader... China has ended up playing a critical role in geopolitics more quickly than anybody had anticipated.

R

[edit]
  • We cannot, if we would, play the part of China, and be content to rot by inches in ignoble ease within our borders, taking no interest in what goes on beyond them, sunk in a scrambling commercialism; heedless of the higher life, the life of aspiration, of toil and risk, busying ourselves only with the wants of our bodies for the day, until suddenly we should find, beyond a shadow of question, what China has already found, that in this world the nation that has trained itself to a career of un-warlike and isolated ease is bound, in the end, to go down before other nations which have not lost the manly and adventurous qualities. If we are to be a really great people, we must strive in good faith to play a great part in the world.
  • [W]hat is nationalism? And what nationalism is actually Western invention. Imperial China had no nationalism. Where do they get their ideas of nationalism? Well, they got their ideas of nationalism from the Japanese, which emerged as a national state in the 19. Well, where did the Japanese get their ideas about nationalism, which were then translated into Chinese? They got it from the Germans. So what they imported was a 19th-century version of social Darwinism in which race is of the fundamental basis of nationality and there are very – when you hear Xi Jinping and other Chinese leaders talking about cultural pollution, when you talk about the natural affinity of all Chinese people wherever they are, you begin to worry that there is this submerged, and sometimes not even so, some racialist component.
  • If you want to know what people are worried about look at what they spend their money on. If you’re afraid of burglars you buy a burglar alarm. What are the Chinese spending their money on? We’re told from Chinese figures they’re spending on the People’s Armed Police, the internal security force is about as big as they’re spending on the regular military. This whole great firewall of Chinese, this whole massive effort to control the internet, this effort to use modern information technology not to disseminate information, empowering individuals, but to make people think what you want them to think and to monitor their behavior so that you can isolate and suppress them. That’s because this is a regime which is fundamentally afraid of its own people. And it’s fundamentally hostile to them.
  • The typical Westerner wishes to be the cause of as many changes as possible in his environment; the typical Chinaman wishes to enjoy as much and as delicately as possible.
  • The Chinese are a great nation, incapable of permanent suppression by foreigners. They will not consent to adopt our vices in order to acquire military strength; but they are willing to adopt our virtues in order to advance in wisdom. I think they are the only people in the world who quite genuinely believe that wisdom is more precious than rubies. That is why the West regards them as uncivilized.
    • Bertrand Russell, The Problem of China (1922), Ch. XIII: Higher education in China.

S

[edit]
  • China is, in essence, a very narrow-minded, self-interested, realist state, seeking only to maximize its own national interests and power. It cares little for global governance and enforcing global standards of behavior, except its much-vaunted doctrine of noninterference in the internal affairs of countries. Its economic policies are mercantilist and its diplomacy is passive. China is also a lonely strategic power, with no allies and experiencing distrust and strained relationships with much of the world.
  • China is a very contradictory country... China punches way below its weight, it is not, it is free-riding... It is not contributing... China is a lonely power... Who wants to seek political asylum in China? Nobody.
  • The subsequent evolution of the Chinese state is one where bureaucratic recruitment and rule became ever more routinized, and this occurred at the expense of hereditary lineages. In western Europe, after the fall of Rome rulers pursued a policy of giving grants of land in exchange for military service. These grants tended to be one-way transactions. Over time this led to the creation of a category of members of society with substantial autonomy. The presence of this group would play a prominent role in the early development of medieval assemblies. In China things pushed in the opposite direction. With the perfection of an imperial examination system during the Tang and Song dynasties, Chinese rulers had at their disposal a means of bureaucratic recruitment that did not depend on societal networks outside of their control. Being a member of the elite now meant being part of the state itself.
    • David Stasavage, The Decline and Rise of Democracy: A Global History from Antiquity to Today (2020), pp. 14-15
  • The Chinese people have only family and clan solidarity; they do not have national spirit...they are just a heap of loose sand...Other men are the carving knife and serving dish; we are the fish and the meat.

T

[edit]
  • One of the greatest untold secrets of history is that the 'modern world' in which we live is a unique synthesis of Chinese and Western ingredients. Possibly more than half of the basic inventions and discoveries upon which the 'modern world' rests come from China. And yet few people know this. Why? The Chinese themselves are as ignorant of this fact as Westerners. From the seventeenth century onwards, the Chinese became increasingly dazzled by European technological expertise, having experienced a period of amnesia regarding their own achievements. When the Chinese were shown a mechanical clock by Jesuit missionaries, they were awestruck. They had forgotten that it was they who had invented mechanical clocks in the first place!
    • Robert K. G. Temple - The Genius of China: 3,000 Years of Science, Discovery and Invention (1986).
  • Arise! All those who don't want to be slaves! Let our flesh and blood forge our new Great Wall! As the Chinese nation has arrived at its most perilous time, every person is forced to expel their very last roar.
  • No California gentleman or lady ever abuses or oppresses a Chinaman, under any circumstances, an explanation that seems to be much needed in the east. Only the scum of the population do it; they and their children. They, and, naturally and consistently, the policemen and politicians, likewise, for these are the dust-licking pimps and slaves of the scum, there as well as elsewhere in America.
  • A disorderly Chinaman is rare, and a lazy one does not exist. So long as a Chinaman has strength to use his hands he needs no support from anybody; white men often complain of want of work, but a Chinaman offers no such complaint; he always manages to find something to do.
  • I have seen Chinamen abused and maltreated in all the mean, cowardly ways possible to the invention of a degraded nature... I never saw a Chinaman righted in a court of justice for wrongs thus done to him.
    • Mark Twain, as quoted in Mark Twain and the Three Rs: Race, Religion, Revolution and Related Matters (1973), by Maxwell Geismar, Indianapolis: Bobs-Merrill, p. 98.

V

[edit]

W

[edit]
  • There is a strange symmetry to China’s twentieth century, and much of it is linked to the ideological Cold War. At the beginning of the century, China’s republican revolution was overtaken by Communism and conflict. And at the end of the century, Communism was overtaken by money and markets. In between lay a terrible time of destruction and reconstruction, of enthusiasm and cynicism, and of almost never-ending rivers of blood. What marks these Chinese revolutions most of all is their bloodthirst: according to a recent estimate, seventy-seven million Chinese died unnatural deaths as a result of warfare or political mass-murder between the 1920s and the 1980s, and the vast majority of them were killed by other Chinese.
    • Odd Arne Westad, The Cold War: A Global History (2017)
  • Chinese is the easiest language when it is learned at ease, dwelling on its spirit rather than on the individual expression. But for inquisitive questioners, this language provides vain pitfalls.
  • One of the things we're trying to do is view the China threat as not just a whole-of-government threat, but a whole-of-society threat on their end, and I think it's going to take a whole-of-society response by us.

X

[edit]
  • When our thousands of Chinese students abroad return home, you will see how China will transform itself.
    • Deng Xiaoping, as quoted in Forbes, Vol. 176, Editions 7-13 (2005), p. 79

Z

[edit]
  • People who try to commit suicide — don't attempt to save them! . . . China is such a populous nation, it is not as if we cannot do without a few people.
  • This experience and the historical experiences gained by the Party since its founding can be summarized as follows: Our Party must always represent the requirements for developing China's advanced productive forces, the orientation of China's advanced culture and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people. These are the inexorable requirements for maintaining and developing socialism, and the logical conclusion our Party has reached through hard exploration and great praxis.
    • Jiang Zemin, work report at the Communist Party of China Congress (8 November 2002), as quoted in Selected Works of Jiang Zemin, Eng. ed., FLP, Beijing, 2013, Vol. III, p. 519.
  • A review of our party's seventy-plus-year history elicits an important conclusion. Our party earned the people's support during the historical periods of revolution, construction and reform because it always represented the requirements for developing China's advanced productive forces, the orientation of China's advanced culture and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people. The party also earned popular support because it fought tirelessly to realize the fundamental interests of the country and the people by formulating a correct line, principles and policies. Today, humanity once again stands at the beginning of a new century and a new millennium. How our party can better effectuate the Three Represents under the new historical conditions is a major issue all Party comrades, especially high-ranking party cadres, must consider deeply... The Communist Party of China should represent the development trends of advanced productive forces, the orientations of an advanced culture and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the people of China.

See also

[edit]
[edit]
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
Wikipedia has an article about:
China at Wikiquote's sister projects:
Article at Wikipedia
Definitions and translations from Wiktionary
Media from Commons
Source texts from Wikisource
Database entry #Q148 on Wikidata
Travel guide from Wikivoyage